
Note: The following material is a scanned-in
research resource; it is NOT intended as an exact reproduction
of the original volume. Due to computer display variances, page numbers are
approximate. Scanned at Phoenixmasonry by Ralph Omholt, PM - June 2007.
The History Of Freemasonry
By
Albert G. Mackey 33°
VOLUME FIVE
PART 2. - HISTORY OF
FREEMASONRY
PAGE
CHAPTER
[Original Volumes
/
This Copy]
43. - The Union of the Two
Grand Lodges of England
.......... 1155 / 6
44. - The Grand Lodge of
France ................................................... 1183 / 33
45. - Origin of the Grand
Orient of France ...................................... 209 / 56
46. - Introduction of
Freemasonry into the
North American
Colonies
..
. 1224 / 68
47. - The Early Grand Lodge
Warrants .......................................... 1235 / 79
48. - Origin of the Royal
Arch......................................................... 1238 / 82
49. - The Introduction of
Royal Arch Masonry into America
.... 1264 / 109
50. - The General Grand
Chapter of the United States
...... 1290 / 132
Obituary Notices of Dr.
Mackey's Death ....................................... 1302 / 146
Salutatory, by William R.
Singleton............................................... 1305 / 151
51. - General History of
Christian Knighthood............................. 1309 / 153
52. - The Introduction of
Knight Templarism into America......... 1368 / 209
53. - The General Grand
Encampment in the United States....... 1384 / 226
PART 3. - FREEMASONRY IN THE
UNITED STATES
54. - The First Lodge and the
Grand Lodge of each State
.... 1394 / 247
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
VOLUME FIVE
PAGE
William R. Singleton
....... 1166
/
16
Operative Masons of the Middle
Ages
..
. 1198
/
47
The Mother Lodge of Kilwinning
. 1230
/
75
J. M. Ragon
. 1262
/
105
Temperance, Fortitude,
Prudence, and Justice
..
. 1326
/
167
Dream of Constantine
.
. 1342
/
182
Sir Christopher Wren
..
. 1374
/
215
Highest Hills and Lowest Vales
. 1390
/
231
The Old Tun Tavern,
Philadelphia
..
. 1422
/
293



CHAPTER XLIII
THE UNION OF THE TWO GRAND
LODGES OF ENGLAND
THE
fusion of the two rival Grand Lodges - the "Ancients" and the "Moderns" - was
the most important event that has occurred in the history of Speculative
Freemasonry since the organization of 1717.
The
mutual denunciations of two bodies, each practicing almost the same rites and
ceremonies, each professing to be actuated by the same principles, and each
tending to the accomplishment of the same objects, and each claiming to be the
supreme Head of the Masonic Institution while it accused its antagonist of
being irregular in its organization and a usurper of authority, could not have
failed eventually to impair the purity and detract from the usefulness of the
Institution.
The
sentiment of active opposition on the part of the "Moderns" had grown with the
increasing success of their rivals. In 1777 the constitutional Grand Lodge had
declared "that the persons who assemble in London and elsewhere in the
character of Masons, calling themselves Ancient Masons, and at present said to
be under the patronage of the Duke of Atholl, are not to be countenanced or
acknowledged by any regular lodge or Mason under the constitution of England;
nor shall any regular Mason be present at any of their conventions to give a
sanction to their proceedings, under the penalty of forfeiting the privileges
of the Society, nor shall any person initiated at any of their irregular
meetings be admitted into any lodge without being re-made.'' (1)
This
anathema was followed at different periods during the rest of the century by
others of equal severity. The " Modern Masons," knowing the legality of their
own organization and the false pretensions of the " Ancients," are to be
excused and even justified for the
(1)
Preston gives this degree in full; Northouck only summarizes it. see Preston,
" Illustrations," Oliver's edition, p. 242, and Northouck, " Constitutions,"
p. 323.
intensity of their opposition and even for the harshness of their language.
Feeling assured, from all the historical documents with which they were
familiar, that the Grand Lodge organized in 1717 was the only legitimate
authority in English Masonry, it was natural that they should denounce any
pretension to the possession of that authority by others as an imposture.
The
"Ancients," who, notwithstanding the positiveness with which they asserted
their claim to a superior antiquity, must, unconsciously at times, have felt
their weakness, never displayed so acrimonious a spirit. On the contrary, they
were unwilling to enter into discussions which might elicit facts detrimental
to the solidity of their pretensions.
Hence,
we find Dermott saying: " I have not the least antipathy against the gentlemen
of the modern society; but, on the contrary, love and respect them; "
(1)
and though in a subsequent edition he complains that this amicable sentiment
was not reciprocated, he admits the equal right of each society to choose a
Grand Master, and expresses the hope to see in his life-time a unity between
the two. (2)
In
1801 the Grand Lodge of "Ancients," in a circular addressed to the Craft, made
the following declaration:
"We
have too much respect for every Society that acts under the Masonic name,
however imperfect the imitation, to enter into a war of reproaches; and,
therefore, we will not retort on an Institution, established in London, for
some years, under high auspices, the unfounded aspersions into which a part of
their body have suffered themselves to be surprised." (3)
About
the beginning of the 19th century many leading Masons among the '*Moderns"
began to recognize the necessity of a union of the two Societies. I am
compelled to believe, or at least to suspect, that at first the success of the
"Ancients" was a controlling motive in this desire for a fusion of the two
Grand Lodges.
At
this time there were Grand Lodges of "Ancients," or as they styled themselves,
"Grand Lodges of Ancient York Masons," which had emanated from the London
body, in Canada, Pennsylvania. Maryland, South Carolina, New York,
Massachusetts, Nova Scotia. Gibraltars and most of the provinces and islands
of the East and
(1) "Ahiman
Rezon," edition of 1764, p. 24.
(2)
Ibid., edition of 1778, pp. 43-44
(3)
Ibid., edition of 1807, p. 124.
West
Indies, and a recognition by the Grand Lodges of Ireland and Scotland. (1)
Elated
with this success and with the diffusion of their authority, the "Ancients"
did not at first incline favorably to the idea of a union of the Craft. They
were willing to accept such a union, but it must be without the slightest
compromise or concession on their part.
Long
before the close of the 18th century the "Ancients" had made an important
change in the character of the claim for regularity which they had advanced in
the beginning of the contest.
Some
time after the Grand Lodge of England, according to the "Old Institutions,"
was organized by a secession of several lodges from the Constitutional Grand
Lodge, Lawrence Dermott, writing in its defense, sought to attribute to it an
origin older than that claimed by the Grand Lodge which had been instituted in
1717, and asserted that that organization " was defective in number and
consequently defective in form and capacity."(2)
Again
he declares that when this Grand Lodge was about to be established, "some
joyous companions," who were only Fellow-Crafts, met together, and being
entirely ignorant of the "Master's part" had invented a "new composition"
which they called the third degree.(3)
At a
later period the "Ancients" appear to have abandoned, or at least to have
ceased to have pressed this claim to a priority of existence and to a greater
regularity of organization. More mature reflection and the force of historical
evidence led their leaders to the conviction that both of these claims were
wholly untenable.
After
the death of Laurence Dermott they began to confine their claim to legality,
and their defense of the secession from the Constitutional Grand Lodge upon
the single ground that the latter had made innovations upon the ancient
landmarks, and by their change of words and ceremonies had ceased any longer
to maintain the pure system of Speculative Freemasonry.
While
these "variations in the established forms" were maintained by the Grand Lodge
of "Moderns," the Grand Lodge of
(1)
Ahiman Rezon," edition of 1807, p. 117.
(2)
Ibid., edition of 1778, p. 14.
(3)
Ibid., p. 35. It will be noted that Dermott did not make these grave
accusations in his previous editions of the "Ahiman Rezon." They are first
advanced in the edition published in 1778.
"Ancients" declared it to be impossible to hold Masonic intercourse with those
who thus deviated from the legitimate work of tithe Order.
Hence,
though, as has been seen, the Ancients were less agressive in their language
toward their rivals and did not indulge in the harsh censures which
characterized the Constitutional Grand Lodge, they were, until after the
commencement of the 19th century, more averse than that body to a union of the
two divisions of the Fraternity, and met all advances toward that object with
something more than indifference.
The
evidence of this fact is abundantly shown in the transactions of both bodies.
We
learn, on the authority of Preston, that in November, 1801, a charge was
presented to the Constitutional Grand Lodge against some of its members for
patronizing and officially acting as principal officers in a lodge of
"Ancients." The charge being proved, it was determined that the laws should be
enforced against them unless they immediately seceded from such irregular
meetings. They solicited the indulgence of the Grand Lodge for three months,
hoping that they might be enabled in that time to effect a union between the
two societies. This indulgence was granted, and that no impediment might
prevent the accomplishment of so desirable an object, the charges against the
offending brethren were for the time with. drawn. A committee of distinguished
Masons, among whom was the Earl of Moira, who was very popular with the Craft
of " Moderns," was appointed to pave the way for the intended union, and every
means were ordered to be used to effect that object.
Lord
Moira declared, on accepting the appointment as a member of the Committee,
that he should consider the day on which such a coalition should be formed as
one of the happiest days of his life, and that he was empowered by the Prince
of Wales, then Grand Master of the " Moderns," to say that his arms would be
ever open to all the Masons in the kingdom, indiscriminately. (1)
This
was the first open and avowed proposition for a union of the two Grand Lodges.
It emanated from the " Moderns," and up to that date none had ever been
offered by the 'Ancients," who were silently and successfully pursuing their
career - in extending
(1)
Preston, "Illustrations," old edition, p. 329.
tending their influence, making lodges at home and abroad, and securing the
popular favor of the Craft. (1)
The
effort, however, was not successful. After suspending all active opposition,
the Constitutional Grand Lodge learned in February, 1803, that no measures had
been taken to effect a union; it resumed its antagonistic position, punished
the brethren who had been charged with holding a connection with the "
Ancients," and unanimously resolved that "whenever it shall appear that any
Masons under the English Constitution shall in future attend or countenance
any lodge or meeting of persons calling themselves Ancient Masons under the
sanction of any person claiming the title of Grand Master of England, who
shall not have been duly elected in the Grand Lodge, the laws of the Society
shall not only be strictly enforced against them, but their names shall be
erased from the list and transmitted to all the regular Lodges under the
Constitution of England."(2)
What
were the means adopted by the Constitutional Grand Lodge to accomplish the
much-desired object are not now exactly known. But that they were highly
distasteful to the "Ancients" is very clear from the action of their Grand
Lodge adopted on March 2, 1802.
This
action was evidently intended as a reply to the proposition of the rival body
of "Moderns," tendered in the preceding November.
The
declaration of the Grand Lodge of "Ancients" is printed in Harper's edition of
the Ahiman Rezon, published in 1807. (3) As this work is not generally
accessible to the Fraternity, and as the document presents a very full and
fair expression of the position assumed by the "Ancients" at that advanced
period in the history of their career, I shall copy it without abbreviation.
"It
was represented to this Grand Lodge, that notwithstanding the very temperate
notice which was taken in the last Quarterly Communication, of certain
unprovoked expressions used toward the Fraternity of Ancient Masons, by a
Society generally known by the appellation of the Modern Masons of England,
that body has been
(1)
There is no doubt that at that day, in America certainly, the "Ancients" were
more popular than the "Moderns." Hence there appears to have been a settlement
of expedience exhibited in the desire of the latter to effect a coalition.
(2)
Preston, "Illustrations," old edition, p. 330.
(3)
Pages 125-131.
further prevailed on to make declarations and to proceed to acts at once
illiberal and unfounded with respect to the character, pretensions, and
antiquity of this institution. It was not a matter of surprise that from the
transcendent influence of the pure and unchanged system of Ancient Masonry,
practiced in our regular lodges, the solidity of our establishment, the
progressive increase of our funded capital, the frequency and extent of our
benevolence, and, above all, from the avowed and unalterable bond of union,
which has so long and so happily subsisted between us and the Ancient Grand
Lodges of Scotland, Ireland, America, and the East and West Indies, it should
be a most desirable object to the body of Modern Masons to enroll the two
societies under one banner by an act of incorporation; but we did not expect
that they would have made use of the means which have been attempted to gain
the end.
Bearing, as they do, the Masonic name, and patronized by many most illustrious
persons, we have ever shown a disposition to treat them with respect, and we
cannot suppress our feelings of regret, that unmindful of the high auspices by
which they are, for the time, distinguished, they should here condescend to
the use or language which reflects discredit on their cause. Truth requires no
acrimony, and brotherhood disclaims it. It is a species of warfare so
inconsistent with the genuine principles of Masonry, that they may wage it
without the fear of a retort. Actuated by the benignity which these principles
inspire, we shall content ourselves with a tranquil appeal to written record.
It is not for two equal, independent and contending institutions to expect
that the world will acquiesce in the apse digit of either party. We shall not
rest our pretensions, therefore, on extracts from our own books, or on
documents in our own possession - but out of their own mouths shall we judge
them."
In
their Book of Constitutions, quarto edition, anno 1784, p. 240, they make this
frank confession: "Some variations were made in the established forms." This
is their own declaration, and they say that these were made "more effectually
to debar them and their abettors (that is, us, the ancient masons) from their
lodges." Now what was the nature of these changes? Fortunately, the dispute
did not rest between the two rival bodies; it was not for either to decide
which had the claim of regular descent from the ancient stock of the "York
Masons." There was a competent tribunal. The Masonic world alone could
exercise the jurisdiction and pronounce a verdict on the case. Accordingly,
after frequent visitations made to our lodges by the brethren from Scotland
and Ireland, who repaired to England, the two Grand Lodges of these parts of
the united empire pronounced in our favor and declared that in the Ancient
Grand Lodge of England the pure, unmixed principles of Masonry -the original
and holy obligations - the discipline and the pure science, were preserved. It
was not in the forms alone that variations had been made by the modern order.
They had innovated on the essential principles, and consequently the Masonic
world could not recognize them as brothers.
"In
the strict and rigorous, but beautiful, scheme of Ancient Masonry, every part
of which was founded on the immutable laws of truth, nothing was left for
future ages to correct. There can be no reforms in the cardinal virtues; that
which was pure, just, and true as received from the eternal ordinance of the
divine Author of all good, must continue the same to all eternity. In this
grand mystery, every part of which contributes to a sacred end, even the
exteriors of the science were wisely contrived as the fit emblems of the white
and spotless lamb, which is the type of Masonic benignity.
"The
Grand Lodge can not be more explicit. They will not follow the blameable
practice of entering into a public discussion of what ought to be confined to
the sanctuary of a regular lodge. Suffice it to say, that after mature
investigation by the only persons who were authorized to pronounce a judgment
on the subject, resolutions of correspondence were passed by the Ancient Grand
Lodges of England, Ireland, and Scotland, which were entered in their
respective archives, and which the Fraternity will find in our Book of
Constitutions.
"These
resolutions have been constantly acted upon from that time to the present day.
We have since been further strengthened by the formal accession of the Grand
Lodges of America and of the East and West Indies to the Union. And it may now
be said, without any impeachment of the modernized order, that the phalanx of
Ancient Masonry is now established to an extent of communication that bids
defiance to all malice, however keen, and to all misrepresentation, however
specious, to break asunder. May the Eternal Architect of the World preserve
the Edifice entire to the latest posterity; for it is the asylum of feeble man
against the shafts of adversity, against the perils of strife, and what is his
own enemy against the conflict of his own passions. It draws more close the
ties of consanguinity where they are, and creates them where they are not; it
inculcates this great maxim as the means of social happiness, that, however
separated by seas and distances, distinguished by national character or
divided into sects, the whole community of man ought to act toward one
another, in all the relations of life, like brothers of the same family, for
they are children of the same Eternal Father, and Masonry teaches them to
seek, by amendment of their lives, the same place of rest.
"The
Ancient Grand Lodge of England has thought it due to its character to make
this short and decisive declaration, on the unauthorized attempts that have
recently been made to bring about a union with a body of persons who have not
entered into the obligations by which we are bound, and who have descended to
calumnies and acts of the most unjustifiable kind.
"They
desire it therefore to be known to the Masonic world and they call upon their
regular lodges, their Past and Present Grand Officers, and their Royal Arches
and Masters, their Wardens and Brethren throughout the whole extent of the
Masonic communion, to take notice, that they can not and must not receive into
the body of a just and perfect lodge, nor treat as a Brother, any person who
has not received the obligations of Masonry according to the Ancient
Constitutions, as practiced by the United Grand Lodges of England, Scotland,
and Ireland, and the regular branches that have sprung from their sanction.
And this our unalterable decree, 'By Order of the Grand Lodge."
A
careful perusal of this document will show that the position which had been
assumed by the "Ancients" at the middle of the 18th century, when they
organized their Grand Lodge, was abandoned by them at its close. Dermott
maintained that his Grand Lodge was regular in its organization on the ground
that the organization of the other body was irregular and illegal, and
illegitimate. One of the reasons he assigned for this illegality was that it
had been formed by a less than lawful number of lodges. There were but four
lodges engaged in the organization of the Grand Lodge at London in the year
1717. But, says Dermott, with the utmost effrontery, knowing, as he must have
known, that there was no such law or usage in existence nor ever had been, "to
form a Grand Lodge there must have been the Masters and Wardens of five
regular lodges;" and he adds that "this is so well known to every man
conversant with the ancient laws, usages, customs, and ceremonies of Master
Masons, that it is needless to say more.'' (1) Hence the Grand Lodge of 1717
"was defective in number and consequently defective in form and capacity."
Another charge made by Dermott against the "Moderns" was that they were
ignorant of the true Third degree and had fabricated a mere imitation of it, a
"new composition" as he contemptuously calls it.
But at
the close of the century both these charges were abandoned and a new issue was
joined. The ground on which the "Ancients" rested the defense of their
secession in 1738 from the Constitutional Grand Lodge was that that body had
made "variations in the established forms;" in other words, that it had
introduced innovations into the ritual.
Now
this would seem to be a singularly surprising instance of mental aberration,
if we did not know the perversity of human nature. When charging the "Moderns"
with the introduction of innovations, the "Ancients" appear to have completely
forgotten that far more serious innovations had been previously introduced by
themselves.
The
"Moderns" had only made a transposition of a couple of words of recognition;
the "Ancients" had mutilated the Third degree and fabricated out of it a
Fourth, hitherto unknown to the Craft. It ill became these bold innovators to
condemn others for the very fault they themselves had committed to a far
greater extent.
We are
ready to exclaim with the Roman satirist: "Quis tulerit Gracchos de seditione
querenges.?" (2) "Who could endure the Gracchi when they complained of
sedition ?"
Having
thus, by implication, at least, admitted the legality of the original
organization of the Constitutional Grand Lodge and the correctness of its
primitive work, and restricting their charge of irregularity to the single
fact of the existence of innovations, the "Ancients," notwithstanding the
emphatic language in their address of
(1) "Ahiman
Rezon," edition of 1778, p. 13.
(2)
Juvenal, Satire II., 24
1802,
in which they had declared the impossibility of recognizing their rivals, had
certainly made the way more easy for future reconciliation and union.
Had
they continued to maintain the theory of Dermott that the Grand Lodge of
'Moderns" was an illegal and un-Masonic body, which had never known or had the
Master's part, I do not see how the "Moderns" could, with consistency and
self-respect, have tendered, or the "Ancients" listened to, any offer of union
and a consolidation.
But
about the beginning of the 19th century there were many Masons, especially
among the "Moderns," who felt the necessity of a reconciliation, since the
protracted dissension was destructive of that harmony and fellowship which
should properly characterize the institution. We have seen that the Prince of
Wales had in 1801, when he was Grand Master of the "Moderns," expressed his
willingness for a union of all English Masons. This sentiment was shared at a
later period by his brothers, the Dukes of Kent and Sussex.
But of
all the distinguished members of the Constitutional Grand Lodge, none was so
zealous and indefatigable in the effort to accomplish a reconciliation as the
Earl of Moira, who in 1795 had been Acting Grand Master under the Grand
Mastership of the Prince of Wales. (1)
In
1801 he had been appointed one of a committee to attempt to effect a union of
the two Grand Lodges - a mission which was unsuccessful in its results. But he
was more felicitous two years afterward in his efforts to induce a good
understanding between the Grand Lodge of Scotland and the Constitutional Grand
Lodge of England.
It has
been heretofore seen that at an early period in the career of the Atholl Grand
Lodge, the Grand Lodges of Ireland and Scotland had been induced, through the
influence and misrepresentations
(1) To
no person, says Preston, had Masonry for many years been more indebted than to
the Earl of Moira (now Marquis of Hastings).
Toward
the end of the year 1812 his Lordship was appointed Governor-General of India;
and it was considered by the Fraternity as only a just mark of respect to
invite his Lordship to a farewell banquet previous to his departure from
England, and to present him with a valuable Masonic Jewel, as a memorial of
their gratitude for his eminent services. Preston, "Illustrations of Masonry,"
old edition, p. 346.
of
Dermott, to take the part of the "Ancients" and to recognize them as the only
legal Masonic authority in England.
In
1782 the Constitutional Grand Lodge, supposing, it seems fallaciously, that
there was some prospect of establishing a friendly correspondence with the
sister kingdoms, concurred in a resolution recommending the Grand Master to
use every means which in his wisdom he might think proper, for promoting a
correspondence with the Grand Lodges of Scotland and Ireland, so far as should
be consistent with the laws of the Society. (1)
As
this last provision necessarily required, on the part of the Irish and
Scottish brethren, a denunciation of their friends the ancient Masons," we may
infer this to have been the cause of the unsuccessful result of the
negotiation. Notwithstanding this resolution, says Preston, the wished-for
union was not then fully accomplished. (2)
But
twenty years had to elapse before a spirit of conciliation was shown by the
Grand Lodge of Scotland, and eight more before the Grand Lodge of Ireland
exhibited a similar spirit.
At the
annual session of the Grand Lodge of Scotland in November, 1803, the Earl of
Moira being present, addressed the Grand Lodge in what Laurie calls an
impressive speech, equally remarkable for the eloquence of its sentiments and
the energy of its enunciation.
As the
account contained in Laurie's History is a contemporary one, it may be
considered as reliable and is worth giving in the very words of the author of
his work.(3)
"The
Earl of Moira stated that the hearts and arms of the Grand Lodge of England
had ever been open for the reception of their seceding brethren, who had
obstinately refused to acknowledge their faults and return to the bosom of
their Lodge; and that though the Grand Lodge of England differed in a few
trifling observances from that of Scotland they had ever entertained for
Scottish Masons that affection and regard which it is the object of
Freemasonry to cherish and the duty of Freemasons to feel. His Lordship's
speech was received by the brethren with loud and
(1)
Northouck, "Constitutions," p. 340.
(2)
"Illustrations," old edition, p. 257.
(3)
Laurie's "History of Freemasonry" was published at Edinburgh in 1804 - the
last entry in the book is the account of this speech.
reiterated applause the most unequivocal mark of their approbation of its
sentiments. (1)
It was
afterward stated by the Earl of Moira, that at that communication the Grand
Lodge of Scotland had expressed its concern that any difference should subsist
among the Masons of England and that the lodges meeting under the sanction of
the Duke of Atholl should have withdrawn themselves from the protection of the
Grand Lodge of England, but hoped that measures might be adopted to produce a
reconciliation, and that the lodges now holding irregular meetings would
return to their duty and again be received into the bosom of the Fraternity.
(2)
This
was certainly an unqualified admission by the Grand Lodge of Scotland that in
its previous action in respect to the contending bodies in England it had been
in error. It did not now hesitate to style the "Ancients" whom it had formerly
recognized irregular Masons, and to acknowledge that their organization was
illegal.
The
inevitable result was soon apparent. The Grand Lodge of Scotland entered into
fraternal correspondence with the Constitutional Grand Lodge of England and
recognized it as the Supreme Authority of English Masonry. This good feeling
was still further augmented by the election in 1805 of the Prince of Wales as
Patron and Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Scotland and the appointment of
the Earl of Moira as Acting Grand Master, both of which high offices were
respectively held at the same time by the same persons in the Constitutional
Grand Lodge of England.
Here
then was a thorough reversal of the conditions which had previously existed.
In the year 1772 the office of Grand Master, both in England and in Scotland,
had been filled by the same per son, the Duke of Atholl. But it was over the
irregular and illegal English body that he presided. The result was a close
and friendly alliance between the Grand Lodge of Scotland and the schismatic
Grand Lodge in England.
Again
in the year 1805 we see the Grand Lodge of England and the Grand Lodge of
Scotland united under one and the same Grand Master, the Prince of Wales. But
now it was the regular Grand Lodge of England that shared the honor of this
royal headship
(1)
Laurie's "History," p. 295.
(2)
Preston, "Illustrations," old edition, P. 338.

WILLIAM R. SINGLETON
with
the Scottish Grand Lodge. The result in this latter case was of course exactly
contrary to that which had ensued in the former.
From
this time there was no question as to the relations existing between the two
Grand Lodges.
Still
further to strengthen the cement of this union, if such strengthening were
necessary, was the occurrence soon after of an event in Scottish Masonry.
Schism, which had wrought so much evil in English Masonry, at length made its
appearance among the Scottish lodges.
In the
year 1808 several lodges had seceded, from political motives, it is believed,
from the Grand Lodge of Scotland. They had organized an independent body with
the title of "The Associated lodges seceding from the present Grand Lodge of
Scotland " and on July 4th had met in the Cannongate Kilwinning Lodge room,
and elected a Grand Master. (1)
The
Grand Lodge of Scotland announced this rebellious action to the Grand Lodge of
England, which expressed its fullest sympathy with the Grand Lodge, approved
of the methods it pursued to punish the seceders and to check the secession,
and proclaimed the doctrine now universally accepted in Masonic law, that a
Grand Lodge, as the representative of the whole Craft, is the sole depository
of supreme power.
Thus
was the union of the two Grand Lodges still more closely cemented, and the
Grand Lodge of Scotland became an earnest advocate and collaborator in the
effort to extinguish the English schism.
In the
same year the Grand Lodge of Ireland addressed a communication to the Grand
Lodge of England, in which it took occasion to applaud the principles of
Masonic law enunciated by that Grand Lodge in its reply to its Scottish
sister. The Grand Lodge of Ireland also expressed its desire to co-operate
with that of England in maintaining the supremacy of Grand Lodges over
individual lodges It also pledged itself not to countenance or receive as a
Brother any person standing under the interdict of the Grand Lodge
(1) It
is unnecessary and irrelevant to enter here into the history of this
secession. The details will be found at full length in Bro. Lyon's "History of
the Lodge of Edinburgh," pp. 264-281. We are here interested only in its
supposed influence upon the relations of the Grand Lodges of Scotland and
England.
of
England for Masonic transgression. It thus cut itself aloof from its former
recognition of the Atholl Grand Lodge. (1)
It is
scarcely necessary to say that this act was received by the Constitutional
Grand Lodge with a reciprocal feeling of fraternity.
Thus
from the year 1808 the three regular and legitimate Grand Lodges of Great
Britain were united in an alliance, the prominent object of which was the
extinction of the schism which had prevailed in England for three-quarters of
a century and the consolidation of all the jarring elements of English
Freemasonry under one head.
With
such powerful influences at work, it is not surprising that the happy and
"devoutly wished-for consummation" was soon effected.
The
leading Freemasons of England, on both sides of the contest, readily lent
their aid to the accomplishment of this result.
The
Prince of Wales having been called, in consequence of the King's mental
infirmity, to the Regency, the established etiquette required that he should
resign the Grand Mastership, a position which he had occupied for twenty-one
years.
On his
retirement the Duke of Sussex was elected Grand Master of the Constitutional
Grand Lodge. He was recognized as an ardent friend of the proposed union.
Through his influence, as Preston supposes, (2) the Duke of Atholl, who was
Grand Master of the "Ancients," had been led to see the desirableness of a
union of the two societies under one head.
A
similar desire for union began now to prevail among the Freemasons of both
sides, especially among the "Ancients," who had hitherto rejected all
proposals for a compromise of any kind that did not include the concession of
everything on the part of the "Moderns."
In
1809 a motion looking to a union was submitted to the Grand Lodge of
"Ancients," but ruled out by the presiding officer, who refused to put the
question. (3)
Nevertheless, the right spirit prevailed, and in 1810 a " Union Committee "
was appointed by the Grand Lodge of "Ancients," which held a joint meeting
with a similar committee of the Grand
(1)
Preston, "Illustrations," old edition, p. 340.
(2)
Ibid, p. 358.
(3)
Haghan's " Memorials," p. 14.
Lodge
of "Moderns," on July 21, 1810, on which occasion the Earl of Moira, Acting
Grand Master of the Constitutional Grand Lodge, presided.
At a
meeting of the Grand Lodge of "Moderns" on April 12, 1809, that body rescinded
all its former resolutions which forbade the admission of the "Ancients" into
their regular lodges, (1) and thus really took the first step toward a formal
recognition of the seceders.
In
1810 the "Ancients" began to make concessions. They directed all resolutions
relating to the union to be published and submitted to the Craft for their
consideration. They also made alterations in their regulations to conform to
those of the "Modern." (2)
But
the time had now arrived when the necessities of concord and harmony
imperatively demanded a cessation of the antagonism which had so long existed
between the two rival Grand Lodges and their consolidation under a common
head, so that Speculative Freemasonry in England should thereafter remain "one
and indivisible."
The
"Moderns" had long been desirous of a union, which, on the other hand, the
Ancients" had always strenuously opposed. "It is," says Bro. Hughan, "to the
credit of the 'Moderns' that they were the firm supporters of the Union, even
when the 'Ancients' refused the right hand of fellowship." (3)
It is
not to be denied that the success of the "Ancients" in winning popularity
among the Craft, especially in America, where they had largely extended they
influence, was a principal reason for their rooted aversion to any sort of
compromise, which would necessarily result in the extinction of their power
and their independent position.
But
many events had recently begun to create a change in their views and greatly
to weaken their opposition to a union of the two Grand Lodges.
In the
first place, the charge that the "Moderns" had made innovations on the
landmarks was losing the importance which had been given to it in the days of
Laurence Dermott. It was still maintained. but no longer urged with
pertinacious vigor. History was
(1)
Hughan's "Memorials," p. 15.
(2)
Their regulations, says Hughan, were also altered so as to conform as much as
possible to those of the regular Grand Lodge.
"Memorials of the Masonic Union," p. 15.
(3)
lbid.
beginning to vindicate truth, and those "Ancients" who thought at all upon the
subject, must have seen that their secession from the regular Grand Lodge had
preceded the innovations of that body, and that they themselves had been
guilty of far greater innovations by the disruption of the Third degree and
the fabrication of a Fourth one.
In the
second place, the theory maintained by Dermott and accepted by his followers,
that the regular Grand Lodge of England, instituted at London in the year
1717, was an illegal body, defective in numbers at its organization and
without the true degrees, had long been abandoned as wholly untenable. History
was again exercising its functions of vindicating truth. It is very evident,
and the "Ancients" knew it, that if the Grand Lodge organization of 1717 was
illegal, their own of 1753 must have been equally so, for the latter had
sprung out of the former. It was felt to be dangerous, when men began to
investigate the records, to advance a doctrine which logically led to such a
conclusion.
A
third reason, and a very strong one, which must have controlled the "Ancients"
in arriving at a change of views, must have been the defection of the Grand
Lodges of Scotland and Ireland. These two bodies which had at first entered
into an alliance with the Atholl Grand Lodge at the expense of the
Constitutional Grand Lodge, had changed sides, and had now recognized the
latter body as the only legal head of Freemasonry in England, had admitted
that the "Ancients" were irregular, and had refused to give them recognition
as Masons.
A
fourth reason was that the Duke of Atholl, who had long been at the head of
the Grand Lodge which bore his name and that of his father, and who for two
generations had been identified with its existence, had been won by the
arguments or influenced by the friendship of the Duke of Sussex, the Grand
Master of the Constitutional Grand Lodge, and had resolved to resign his Grand
Mastership in favor of the Duke of Kent, for the avowed purpose of preparing
for a union of the Craft.
Yielding to these various influences and perhaps to some others of less note,
the Grand Lodge of "Ancients " in the year 1813 abandoned its opposition to a
union, and accepted the preliminary measures which had been adopted by the
friends of that union.
At a
special meeting of the "Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of England,
according to the Old Institutions" held on November 8, 1813, at the "Crown and
Anchor Tavern," in the Strand, a letter was read from the Duke of Atholl
intimating his desire of resigning the office of Grand Master in favor of his
Royal Highness, the Duke of Kent. (1)
At the
same meeting the resignation of the Duke of Atholl was accepted and the Duke
of Kent was unanimously elected to succeed him as Grand Master of the Grand
Lodge of "Ancients."
Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathcarne, the fourth son of George the Third, was
then forty-six years of age. He was initiated into Freemasonry in a lodge at
Geneva, in Switzerland. At the time of this election he was and had long been
the Grand Master of the "Ancient Masons" of Canada. He was, therefore,
identified with the cause of the "Ancients," but like his brothers, the Prince
of Wales and the Duke of Sussex, he was greatly desirous of a consolidation of
the two Grand Lodges. At as early a period as January, 1794, he had expressed
this sentiment in his reply to an address from the Masons of Canada, when he
said: "You may trust that my utmost efforts shall be exerted, that the
much-wished for union of the whole Fraternity of Masons may be effected." (2)
On
December 1, 1813, the Duke of Kent was installed as Grand Master of the
"Ancients." On this occasion the Duke of Sussex, as Grand Master of the
Constitutional Grand Lodge, was present with several of his Grand Officers. To
qualify them for visitation they were previously "made Ancient Masons in the
Grand Master's Lodge No. 1, in a room adjoining."
The
transactions on that day must be considered as a conclusive settlement of the
vexed question of legality. The fact that the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge
of "Moderns" was present, and by his presence sanctioned the installation of
the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of "Ancients," and that to qualify himself
to do so had submitted to an initiation in the system of the "Ancients,"
forever precluded the "Moderns" from making a charge of irregularity against
their rivals; these in turn were equally precluded from denying the Masonic
legality of a body whose Grand Master had
(1)
The minutes of this meeting will be found in Hughan's "Memorials of the
Union," p. 16.
(2)
Freemasons' Magazine, vol. iii., July, 1794, p. 14
been
made participant in their mysteries. and had taken a part in the solemn
ceremonies of installation of their presiding officer.
Indeed, the union had already been virtually accomplished, and all that was
now needed was its formal ratification by the two Grand Lodges.
On
September fist the Duke of Kent, not then Grand Master, had been associated by
the Grand Lodge of Ancients" with Deputy Grand Master Harper and Past Deputy
Grand Masters Perry and Agar as a Committee to take the preliminary steps for
effecting a union of the two fraternities.
This
Committee had held several conferences with the Duke of Sussex, who was
assisted by three of his Grand Officers, Bro.
Wright, Provincial Grand Master of the Ionian Isles, and Past Grand Wardens
Tegart and Deans.
The
joint committee had drawn up articles of union between the two Grand Lodges
which had been signed and sealed in duplicate at Kensington Palace, the
residence of the Duke of Sussex.
Early
in December, at the Quarterly Communications, these Articles had been
submitted to both Grand Lodges and solemnly ratified, and the following
Festival of St. John the Evangelist had been appointed for the Assembly of the
Grand Lodges in joint communication to carry out the provisions which had been
agreed upon.
Each
Grand Master had appointed "nine worthy and expert Master Masons or Past
Masters," to whom were assigned by the Articles of Union the following
important duties.
Under
the Warrant of their respective Grand Lodges they were to meet together in
some convenient central place in London, when each party having opened a lodge
according to the peculiar forms and regulations of each, they were
reciprocally and mutually to give and receive the obligations of both
Fraternities, deciding by lot which should take priority in the giving and
receiving. They were then to hold a lodge under dispensation, to be styled the
"Lodge of Reconciliation," or they were then to visit the different lodges and
having obligated their officers and members to instruct them in the forms of
both the systems. (1)
These
and other preliminary arrangements having been complied with, the two
Fraternities, with their Grand Lodges, met on December
(1)
See "Articles of Union," Article V.
27,
1813, at Freemasons' Hall, which had been fitted up agreeably to a previously
devised plan, and the whole house tiled from the outer porch. (1)
On
each side of the room the Masters, Wardens, and Past Masters of the several
lodges were arranged on benches, and so disposed that the two Fraternities
were completely intermixed.
The
two Grand Lodges were opened in two adjoining rooms, each according to its
peculiar ceremonies, and a Grand Procession being formed, the two bodies
entered side by side the Hall of Assembly, the Duke of Sussex closing one
procession and the Duke of Kent the other.
On
entering the Hall the procession advanced to the Throne, and opening inward
the two Grand Masters proceeded up the center and took seats on each side of
the Throne.
The
Past Grand officers and illustrious visitors occupied the platform, and the
two Senior Grand Wardens, the two Junior Grand Wardens, and the two Grand
Secretaries and Grand Treasurers occupied the usual stations in the West,
South, and North.
Silence having been proclaimed, the services began with prayer, offered up by
Rev. Dr. Barry, the Grand Chaplain of the "Ancients."
After
the act of union had been read by Sir George Naylor, Grand Director of
Ceremonies, the following proclamation was made by the Rev. Dr. Coghlan, Grand
Chaplain of the Grand Lodge of "Moderns."
"Hear
ye: This is the Act of Union engrossed in confirmation of Articles solemnly
concluded between the two Grand Lodges of Free and Accepted Masons of England,
signed, sealed, and ratified by the two Grand Lodges respectively: by which
they are hereafter and forever to be known and acknowledged by the style and
title of THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ANCIENT FREEMASONS OF ENGLAND. How say you,
Brothers, Representatives of the two Fraternities? Do you accept of, ratify
and confirm the same ?"
To
which the whole Assembly answered: "We do accept, ratify any confirm the
same."
(1)
This account is condensed from Oliver's edition of Preston, pp. 368-373. The
"Order of Proceedings" to be observed on the occasion are given by Bro. Hughan
in his Memorials. They do not essentially differ from the details by Preston,
and the latter has the advantage of being in the past tense.
The
Grand Chaplain then said: "And may the Great Architect of the Universe make
the Union perpetual." To which all the Brethren replied: "so mote it be."
The
Articles of Union were then signed by the two Grand Masters and six
Commissioners, and the seals of both Grand Lodges were affixed to the same.
Proclamation was then made by Rev. Dr. Barry in the following words:
"Be it
known to all men that the Act of Union between the two Grand Lodges of Free
and Accepted Masons of England is solemnly signed, sealed, ratified and
confirmed, and the two Fraternities are one, to be henceforth known and
acknowledged by the style and title of "The United Grand Lodge of Ancient
Freemasons of England: and may the Great Architect of the Universe make their
Union perpetual."
The
Brethren all responded "Amen," and a symphony was played by the Grand
Organist, Bro. Samuel Wesley.
The
Ark of the Masonic Covenant, which had been placed in front of the Throne, was
then approached by the two Grand Masters, their Deputies and Wardens.
The
Grand Masters standing in the East, the Deputies on their right and left, and
the Grand Wardens in the West and South, the square, level, plumb, and mallet
were successively delivered to the Deputy Grand Masters and by them presented
to the two Grand Masters, who having applied the square, level, and plumb to
the Ark and struck it thrice with the mallet, they made the following
invocation:
"May
the Great Architect of the Universe enable us to uphold the grand edifice of
union, of which this Ark of the Covenant is the symbol, which shall contain
within it the instruments of our brotherly love and bear upon it the Holy
Bible, Square, and Compasses, as the light of our faith and the rule of our
works. May He dispose our hearts to make it perpetual."
And
the Brethren all responded, "so mote it be."
The
Masonic elements of consecration, corn, wine, and oil, were then poured upon
the Ark, according to the ancient Rite, by the two Grand Masters, accompanying
the act with the usual invocation.
This
constituted the impressive ceremony by which the union of the hitherto rival
Fraternities was consecrated.
The
Grand Lodges of Scotland and Ireland were not represented, in consequence of
the shortness of the notice, but letters of congratulation were received from
each, with copies of resolutions which had been passed by both.
As the
two Fraternities differed in their forms and ceremonies, it was necessary that
some compromise should be effected so that a universal system might be adopted
by the united Grand Lodge. The determination of what that system of forms
should be, had been entrusted to the "Lodge of Reconciliation " as its most
important, and doubtless its most difficult duty.
This
duty was accomplished in the following manner: After the ceremonies of
ratification had been performed, the "Lodge of Reconciliation" retired to
another apartment, accompanied by the Count Lagardje, Past Grand Master of the
Grand Lodge of Sweden, Dr. Van Hess of the Grand Lodge of Hamburgh, and other
distinguished Masons, when the forms and ceremonies which had been previously
determined upon by the "Lodge of Reconciliation" were made known.
On
their return to the Assembly-room, Grand Master the Count Lagardje announced
that the forms which had been settled and agreed on by the "Lodge of
Reconciliation" were "pure and correct."
They
were then recognized as the only forms to be thereafter observed and practiced
in the United Grand Lodge and by the lodges under its obedience.
The
recognized obligation was then administered by the Rev. Dr. Hemming, standing
before the Bible, Square and Compasses lying on the Ark, and repeated by all
the Brethren, who solemnly vowed, with joined hands, to abide by the same.
The
next step was the organization of the new Grand Lodge by the election of its
officers.
For
this purpose the Officers of the two Grand Lodges divested themselves of their
insignia, and the chairs were taken by Past Grand Officers of the two
Fraternities.
The
Duke of Kent addressed the assembly. He stated that the great object for which
he had taken upon himself the office of Grand Master of the Ancient
Fraternity, as declared at the time, was to facilitate the accomplishment of
the union. He then nominated the Duke of Sussex as Grand Master of the united
Grand Lodge.
The
Duke of Sussex was unanimously elected and placed upon the throne by the Duke
of Kent and Count Lagardje.
The
Grand Master nominated the Grand officers for the year ensuing.
The
Grand Lodge was then called to refreshment, and on returning, some necessary
business having been transacted, the Grand lodge was closed in ample form.
It is
impossible to arrive at any absolutely accurate knowledge of the numerical
strength of the two Fraternities at the time of the union. This arises from
the fact that the lists made by both Grand Lodges at that date contained the
names of many lodges which were either extinct or had passed over to other
jurisdiction.
Thus
in the list of the "Moderns" ending in 1812, as given by Bro. Gould in his
Four Old Lodges, the number of lodges runs up to 640; but of these many, as
the list commences with the year 1721, must have long ceased to exist, and
several are recorded as being in Germany and France, where the English Grand
Lodge had no longer any jurisdiction, and nineteen are credited to the United
States of America, where independent Grand Lodges had long been established.
In the
same inaccurate way we find that the list of the "Ancients," published in 1813
in their Ahiman Rezon, records 354 lodges as being under its jurisdiction.
Many
of these, however, had passed from its jurisdiction or must have ceased to
exist. Ten lodges, for instance, are credited to the United States, and some
to other foreign countries where the Grand Lodge no longer possessed any
authority.
We
may, however, estimate the comparative strength of the two Fraternities at the
union by the registry of lodges made at that time, when the members were
assigned by lot.
In
that list, which is given by Bro. Hughan in his Memorials of the Union, 636
lodges are enrolled. Of these, 385 were "Moderns," and 251 "Ancients." If,
however, it be considered that the former had been in existence for ninety-six
years and the latter only sixty, (1) it will be seen that the relative
proportion of successful growth was greatly in favor of the "Ancients."
Notwithstanding that the Constitutional Grand Lodge had secured the adhesion
of a much higher class in the social element,
(1)
The Grand Lodge of "Moderns" was instituted in 1717, that of the "Ancients"
its 1753. The former commenced with four Lodges, the latter with seven.
that
from the fifth year of its existence it had been presided over by an
uninterrupted succession of Peers of the realm, and that at the very period of
the Union its Grand Master was a son of the reigning monarch, and that its
acknowledged Patron was the heir apparent of the Crown, (1) the Atholl Grand
Lodge without these advantages enjoyed a much greater share of popularity
among the masses of the Craft.
This
popularity can properly be attributed only to that innovation on the accepted
ritual of the Constitutional Grand Lodge which produced the secession. The
dismemberment of the Master's degree and the fabrication of a Fourth degree
called the Royal Arch, gave to the seceders a prestige not-enjoyed by their
rivals. Candidates eagerly repaired for initiation to the body, which promised
them a participation in a larger amount of mystical knowledge.
The
"Moderns" soon became aware of this fact, and it was not very long before,
notwithstanding their outcry against innovation, they adopted the same degree
or at least quietly suffered its intrusion into their own system. A Royal Arch
Chapter and then a Grand Chapter was established by some "Moderns" about the
year 1766, and though it was not actually countenanced, it was not denounced
by the Constitutional Grand Lodge.
It has
been supposed by some writers that the "Ancients" were sustained by and indeed
represented the Operative element of the Craft in opposition to the purely
Speculative, which was represented by the "Moderns."
But of
this there is no satisfactory historical evidence. In 1723 the Operative
Freemasons who, in 1717, had taken a part in the organization of the Grand
Lodge, had been laid upon the shelf by that body, nor is it likely that at a
long interval they would renew the contest in which they had been so signally
defeated.
The
excellent results which followed from the union of the two Fraternities, in
the restoration of peace and concord, and the consequent strengthening of the
Institution, have preserved the method in which this union was effected from
adverse criticism.
The
union was a compromise, and in all compromises there are
(1)
Whatever influence these circumstances must have naturally exerted in a
monarchy, its importance will hardly be appreciated at its full value by the
citizens of a republic. Anderson says that at first the Freemasons were
content "to choose a Grand Master from among themselves, till they should have
the honor of a Noble Brother at their head."
necessarily mutual concessions. But it is a question whether these concessions
by both parties did not involve the sacrifice of certain principles which both
had hitherto deemed important.
The
"Articles of Union" which constituted the groundwork on which the
consolidation of the two Grand Lodges was framed, are twenty- one in number.
Most of these relate to local regulations made necessary by the circumstances.
Only three - the second, third, and fourth - have reference to the concessions
made in the ritual and in the system of Speculative Freemasonry. These
articles are in the following words:
"II.
It is declared and pronounced that pure Ancient Masonry consists of three
degrees, and no more, viz.: those of the Entered Apprentice, the Fellow-Craft,
and the Master Mason, including the Supreme Order of the Holy Royal Arch. But
this article is not intended to prevent any lodge or Chapter from holding a
meeting in any of the degrees of the Orders of Chivalry, according to the
Constitutions of the said Orders.
"III.
There shall be the most perfect unity of obligation, of discipline, of working
the lodges, of making, passing and raising, instructing and clothing the
Brothers; so that one pure, unsullied system, according to the genuine
landmarks, laws and traditions of the Craft shall be maintained, upheld and
practiced, throughout the Masonic World, from the day and date of the said
union until time shall be no more.
"IV.
To prevent all controversy or dispute as to the genuine and pure obligations,
forms, rules and ancient traditions of Masonry and further to unite and bind
the whole Fraternity of Masons in one indissoluble bond, it is agreed that the
obligations and forms that have, from time immemorial, been established, used
and practiced in the Craft, shall be recognized, accepted and taken, by the
members of both Fraternities, as the pure and genuine obligations and forms by
which the incorporated Grand Lodge of England, and its dependent lodges in
every part of the World shall be bound: and for the purpose of receiving and
communicating due light and settling this uniformity of regulation and
instruction (and particularly in matters which can neither be expressed nor
described in writing), it is further agreed that brotherly application be made
to the Grand Lodges of Scotland and Ireland, to authorize, delegate and
appoint, any two or more of their enlightened members, to be present at the
Grand Assembly on the solemn occasion of uniting the said Fraternities; and
that the respective Grand Masters, Grand Officers, Masters, Past Masters,
Wardens and Brothers, then and there present, shall solemnly engage to abide
by the true forms and obligations (particularly in matters which can neither
be described nor written), in the presence of the said Members of the Grand
Lodges of Scotland and Ireland, that it may be declared, recognized and known,
that they are all bound by the same solemn pledge, and work under the same
law."
An
examination of these three articles will clearly demonstrate that both Grand
Lodges made concessions to each other, which involved the sacrifice in turn of
the very points of ritualism on which each had, for nearly three-fourths of a
century, maintained its right to supremacy.
In
Article II. the Royal Arch is recognized as an inherent portion of "Ancient
Craft Masonry." Yet when about 1738 the Freemasons began soon after to call
themselves "Ancient Masons," their lodges were erased from the roll and their
members expelled because they had practiced this same degree. Nothing then and
long after so much incensed the "Moderns" as this innovation, as they called
it, of a new degree. "Our society," said their Grand Secretary, Spencer, "is
neither Arch, Royal Arch, nor Ancient."
On
this point the "Ancients" certainly achieved a victory. The attempted
qualification in the declaration that Ancient Craft Masonry consisted of only
three degrees, which was a concession to preserve the consistency of the
"Moderns," was without meaning, since it was immediately followed by the
admission that there was a Fourth degree.
In
Article III. it is declared that the methods of initiation and instruction
should be according to the genuine landmarks, laws, and traditions of the
Craft. But the United Grand Lodge adopted the changes in the words of the
degrees, which had been introduced by the Constitutional Grand Lodge, to
prevent the intrusion of the seceders into the regular lodges. The
preservation of these words and certain other changes was certainly not in
accordance with the "landmarks," supposing these landmarks to be the usages of
the Craft, adopted at or soon after the organization in the year 1717.
The
result has been to create in these respects a difference between the
Continental and the English-speaking Masons, the former adhering to the
original forms. (1)
This
would be a victory for the "Moderns," but not one of so much importance as
that achieved by the "Ancients" in the recognition of the Royal Arch degree.
The
assertion in Article IV. that the obligations and forms which were agreed upon
at the Union were those which " from time immemorial have been established,
used and practiced by the Craft," is thus found to be merely a "facon de
parler" too much in vogue even at the present day, when referring to the
antiquity of usages.
The
"time immemorial" thus vaunted, dwindles down, in fact, to the date of the
organization of the "Lodge of Reconciliation," to which the regulation of
these "obligations and forms" had been entrusted.
The
confirmation of this new system by the Grand Lodges of Scotland and Ireland,
which was provided for in the same article, was not carried into effect, for
no representatives of these bodies were present.
The
Grand Lodge of Ireland, it may be presumed, as the Irish Masons had long
favored the high degrees, would give its implicit assent to the First Article
in which even the degrees of Chivalry were recognized by sufferance.
But
the Grand Lodge of Scotland had always contended that Ancient Craft Masonry,
or as it was styled, "St. John's Masonry," consisted of only three degrees.
(2) In 1800 it had prohibited its lodges from holding any meetings above the
degree of Master Mason under penalty of the forfeiture of their charter. (3)
And only four years after the United Grand Lodge of England had recognized the
Royal Arch as a part of Ancient Craft Masonry, the Grand Lodge of Scotland
resolved that no person holding official position in a Royal Arch Chapter
should be admitted to membership in the Grand Lodge. (4)
But in
fact we must look for a defense of these compromises by the two Grand Lodges
of England to the peculiar and threatening condition in which they were
placed. Without compromise
(1)
The Gordian knot presented by the change in the Master's Word made by the
"Moderns" was cut, by the adoption or sanction of both words, and they are
still so used in English lodges. In the United States of America the word of
the "Moderns" has long since passed out of the memory and the knowledge of the
Craft, and the original word of Desaguliers and his collaborators alone is
used.
(2)
"The Constitution of the Grand Lodge of Scotland." (3) Lyon "History of the
Lodge of Edinburgh," p. 293.
(4)
Ibid., p. 295.
and
mutual concession of many things the maintenance of which both had once deemed
essential, no union could have been effected, and without a Union the success
and permanency of one, if not of both bodies, would be seriously endangered.
It
must therefore be acknowledged, notwithstanding any criticism on the methods
pursued, which were demanded by the claims of historic truth that, here at
least, the generally to be condemned maxim of the Jesuits, which justifies the
means by the end accomplished, may find some excuse.
Looking back, at this distant period, upon the history of the Craft from the
middle of the 18th to the beginning of the 19th century, when the passions and
prejudices which distracted the Fraternity have ceased to exist, we recognize
the fact that the rivalry of the two factions was destined to be ultimately of
advantage to the institution.
Oliver, speaking of this and other secessions which occurred in the 18th
century, says: " I am persuaded that these schisms, by their general
operation, rather accelerated than retarded the outward progress of Masonry;
for at the precise time when they were most active, we find the science
spreading over all the European nations and exciting the attention of all
ranks and classes of mankind." (1)
Antagonism, in the long run, leads to development. The protracted struggle
which finally terminated in the recognition of the Royal Arch, not only gave
to the Master's degree a completeness which it had before wanted, but by the
establishment of a new ritual, which more nearly approached perfection than
the old one, tended to develop a more philosophic spirit in the system of
Speculative Freemasonry. Of this fact ample evidence is given in the lectures
of Dr. Hemming which were adopted by the United Grand Lodge, and which are
much more intellectual than any that preceded them. (2)
The
old and comparatively meager ritual of Desaguliers, and Anderson, with the
slight additions of Martin Clare, of Dunckerley and Preston, presenting only
an imperfect system, would, but for the Union, have been continued to the
present day, if Speculative Freemasonry had not long before died of inanition.
(1)
"Historical Landmarks," ii., p. 313 (2) It is to Hemming that we are indebted
for that sentence which defines Freemasonry as "a system of morality, veiled
in allegory and illustrated by symbols." It must be confessed, however, that
he made some omissions and alterations in the old lectures, which had better
been spared. But "nihil est ab omni parte beatum."
The
rivalry of the two bodies gave an active expansion of that spirit of charity
which is incidental to every Brotherhood. Neither could afford to be less
kindly disposed to the distressed of their fold than the other. And this
spirit of charity, thus developed during the struggle, was vastly strengthened
and made of more practical utility by the consolidation of the Fraternity.
But
the most important advantage derived from the long antagonism was the
development of the science of symbolism, which has given to the Institution a
just claim to the title of Speculative Masonry, which it had long before
assumed, and elevated it to the rank of a system of moral philosophy.
Now,
for the first time since the disseverance, in the beginning of the 18th
century, of the Speculative from the Operative element was it announced as the
accepted definition of Freemasonry that it was "a system of morality, veiled
in allegory and illustrated by symbols."
It was
Hemming who proclaimed this sublime definition in the Union lectures which he
framed and which has awakened the thoughts and directed the Speculations of
all Masonic scholars who have written since his day.
There
are, it is true, some few defects in the lectures of Dr.
Hemming, but they are on the whole superior to those of Preston - superior
because more philosophic and more symbolical. Preston's system was the germ,
Hemming's the fruit, and the fruit always is better than the germ.
In
conclusion it may be said that the rivalry of the two factions was productive
of this good, that it stimulated each to seek for a higher plane of action and
of character; and the union which finally took place, no matter what was the
actuating motive, was the most fortunate event that had ever occurred in the
Masonic Society, since it developed a higher plane for its action, and secured
it a long and prosperous continuance of life which one or both of the
antagonizing parties must have long since forfeited had there been no Union
effected.