
  
   
  
  The Builder Magazine
  
  
  December 1922 - Volume VIII - 
  Number 12
  
   
  
  Albert Gallatin Mackey
  BY 
  BRO. ROBERT I. CLEGG.  OHIO
  BORN 
  AT Charleston, South Carolina, on March 12, 1807, this scholarly brother lived 
  to the age of 74 years, dying at the Hygeia Hotel at Fortress Monroe, 
  Virginia, June 21, 1881.  He was buried by his bereaved family and sorrowing 
  brethren at Washington, D.C., on Sunday, June 26, with all the solemnity of 
  the several ceremonies of the Masonic Rites wherein he had so long been active 
  in leadership.
   
  
  Graduating with honours at the Charleston Medical College in 1834, Dr. Mackey 
  entered immediately the busy practice of his profession which chiefly occupied 
  his time until 1854 when his literary and Masonic labours engrossed his 
  efforts.  During the Civil War Dr. Mackey was a Union adherent, and President 
  Johnson appointed him Collector of the Port.  Some active interest was taken 
  by him in polities and in a contest for senatorial honours he was defeated by 
  Senator Sawyer in the canvass. Following this experience Dr. Mackey removed to 
  Washington, D. C., in 1870.
   
  In St. 
  Andrews lodge, No. 10, at Charleston, South Carolina, in 1841, Dr. Mackey was 
  initiated, passed and raised. Soon thereafter he affiliated with Solomon's 
  Lodge No. 1, of the same city, becoming Worshipful Master in December, 1842.  
  He became Grand Secretary that year and held this office until 1867, for many 
  years preparing the reports of the Foreign Correspondence Committee of the 
  Grand Lodge.  He was one of the founder members in the formation of Landmark 
  Lodge, No. 76, in the year 1851.
   
  
  Advanced and exalted in Capitular Freemasonry during the winter of 1841-1842, 
  he was elected High Priest in December, 1844; was also elected Deputy Grand 
  High Priest in 1848 and successively re-elected in that position until 1855.  
  In this year and every year thereafter to 1867 he was elected as Grand High 
  Priest of his State.  Elected General Grand High Priest in 1859, he continued 
  in that office until 1868.
   
  Dubbed 
  and created a Knight Templar in South Carolina Commandery No. 1, in 1842, he 
  was elected Eminent Commander in 1844, later being honoured as a Past Grand 
  Warden of the Grand Encampment of the United States.
   
  
  Crowned a Sovereign Grand Inspector General of the Thirty-third and last 
  Degree in 1844, he was for many years Secretary-General of the Supreme 
  Council, Southern Masonic Jurisdiction of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish 
  Rite.
   
  
  Editorially he conducted for many years the Southern and Western Masonic 
  Miscellany.  For two years he was editor-in-chief of the Masonic Quarterly 
  Review.  In 1859 Dr. Mackey became editor of the Department of Masonic 
  Miscellany in the American Freemason, and for three years, beginning in 1872, 
  he published Mackey's National Freemason.
   
  
  Becoming a contributor to the Voice of Masonry in 1875, Dr. Mackey continued 
  actively his writings in that publication until 1878 when his failing health 
  completely checked his further labourist for that periodical.
   
  
  Prolific as an author his books included the History of Freemasonry in seven 
  volumes, the Encyclopedia of Freemasonry in two volumes, Symbolism of 
  Freemasonry, Masonic Jurisprudence, Manual of the Lodge, Book of the Chapter, 
  Principles of Masonic Law, Lexicon of Freemasonry and the Mystic Tie.
   
  After 
  Dr. Mackey, located at Washington D.C., he affiliated with Lafayette Lodge, 
  No. 19, Lafayette Chapter, No. 5, and Washington Commandery, No. 1.
   
  The 
  funeral services in Washington on Sunday, June 26, 1881, were begun at All 
  Souls Church, Unitarian, of which Dr. Mackey was a member, and were conducted 
  by the pastor.  Then followed the ceremonies of a Lodge of Sorrow, Rose Croix 
  Chapter, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, Southern Masonic Jurisdiction, 
  and were in charge of the venerable General Albert Pike and his associate 
  officers.
   
  The 
  long white flowing hair of the patriarchal Sovereign Grand Commander endowed 
  him with a crowned glory as he from the pulpit uttered the solemn words over 
  the dead body of his old friend.  Their intimate fraternal relations quickened 
  in the speaker a multitude of memories and he was deeply affected.  Brother 
  Pike's stern lips trembled with emotion many times, especially when he 
  descended from the pulpit, took the flaming torch in his hand, waved it, and 
  repeatedly summoned with his loud resounding words "Brother, we mourn for 
  thee; we call upon thee to answer us.  Dost thou hear the call?"
   
  Just 
  as Brother Pike said these words, a ray of sunshine from the window at the 
  west streamed in splendour across the church.  His hoary head was thereby 
  aflame with a glowing halo of light like unto the vision of some sturdy 
  stately saint of old.  The tang of sorrow in his tones as he continued sadly 
  with the words of the ritual - "Our Brother answers not our call" - heightened 
  with the tinge of assurance the striking illusion.
   
  The 
  remains were interred in Glenwood Cemetery with the rites of the Symbolic 
  Lodge in charge of Most Worshipful Noble D. Larner, Grand Master of the 
  District of Columbia.
   
  Dr. 
  Mackey as a lecturer had nationally a deservedly high reputation.  He was 
  always most interesting and instructive.  Possessing a very pleasing address, 
  he could deeply impress the favourable attention he invariably awakened in an 
  audience.  As an after-dinner speaker he was declared to be second to none in 
  the United States, his keen wit, lively repartee, and remarkable anecdotal 
  powers causing his society to be sought and solicited on every possible 
  occasion.
   
  Of 
  stalwart and commanding presence and richly cultured discourse Dr. Mackey was 
  in close personal charm at once gentle and dignified, acute in his warm 
  practical sympathies for all suffering humanity, and deeply dowered with a 
  strong faculty for friendship firm as the hills everlasting.
   
  The 
  intense esteem his friends held of Dr. Mackey is well shown by the official 
  letter sent out at his death by the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern 
  Masonic Jurisdiction of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite.  General Albert 
  Pike wrote this appreciative message:
   
  
  "Sickness and old age have brought the ending of his days to the Dean of the 
  Supreme Council, its Secretary-General, Brother Albert Gallatin Mackey.  Born 
  at Charleston, in South Carolina, on the 12th of March, 1807, made a Mason 
  there, it is said, in the year 1841; he became a member of the Supreme Council 
  and Secretary General in 1844, and continued to be both until his death at 
  Fortress Monroe, in Virginia, on the 20th of June, 1881.
   
  
  "Brother Mackey had lived all his life among gentlemen, and had the manners 
  and habits of a gentleman.  Tall, erect, of spare but vigorous frame, his 
  somewhat harsh but striking features were replete with intelligence and 
  amiability; he conversed well, and was liked as a genial and companionable 
  man, of a cheerful, tolerant and kindly nature, who, if he had quarrels with 
  individuals, had none with the world.  Idolized by his wife and children, he 
  loved them devotedly, and suffered intensely when, one after another, his two 
  intelligent and amiable daughters died.  He had many friends, and made 
  enemies, as men of strong will and positive convictions will always surely 
  do.  He plotted no harm against any one, and sought no revenge, even when he 
  did not forgive, not being of a forgiving race for he was a McGregor, having 
  kinship with Rob Roy.
   
  
  "Masonry will not soon lose as great a man, and she may well put dust upon her 
  head and wear sackcloth in her lodges, where, in Masonry, his heart always 
  was.
   
  "Of 
  course, as he grew old, he had his crosses and troubles, and fortune was not 
  kind to him.  Adversity may be profitable; but the world goes too hardly with 
  too many of us; and Sallust truly says:
   
  "'In 
  grief and sorrows, death is a rest from troubles and not a misfortune.'
   
  "A 
  great man hath fallen in Israel; and, in the words of Pushmataha, the Chahta 
  Chief, it is like the falling of a huge oak in the woods.  The fall will be 
  heard afar off, and the sound be re-echoed from many and far-off lands.
   
  "Upon 
  the reading of this letter in the Bodies of our Obedience, the altars and 
  working tools will be draped in black and the brethren will wear the proper 
  badge of mourning during the space of sixty days.  And may our Father which is 
  in Heaven have you always in his holy keeping."
   
  At a 
  Special Communication of the Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia, the 
  following Memorial was presented by a Committee headed by Brother Charles F. 
  Stansbury:
   
  "Our 
  illustrious Brother, Albert Gallatin Mackey, is no more! He died at Fortress 
  Monroe, Va., on the 20th day of June, 1881, at the venerable age of 74, and 
  was buried at Washington on Sunday, June 26th, 1881, with the highest honours 
  of the Craft, all Rites and Orders of Masonry uniting in the last sad services 
  over his remains.
   
  "The 
  announcement of his death has carried a genuine sentiment of sorrow wherever 
  Freemasonry is known. His ripe scholarship, his profound knowledge of Masonic 
  law and usage, his broad views of Masonic philosophy, his ceaseless and 
  invaluable literary labourist in the service of the Order, his noble ideal of 
  its character and mission, as well as his genial personal qualities and his 
  lofty character, had united to make him personally known and widely respected 
  and beloved by the Masonic world.
   
  "While 
  this Grand Lodge shares in the common sorrow of the Craft everywhere at this 
  irreparable loss, she can properly lay claim to a more intimate and peculiar 
  sense of bereavement, inasmuch as our illustrious brother had been for many 
  years an active member of this body, Chairman of the Committee on 
  Jurisprudence, and an advisor ever ready to assist our deliberations with his 
  knowledge and counsel.
   
  "In 
  testimony of our affectionate respect for his memory the Grand Lodge jewels, 
  and insignia will be appropriately draped, and its members wear the usual 
  badge of mourning for thirty days.  A memorial page of our proceedings will 
  also be dedicated to the honour of his name.
   
  "We 
  extend to his family [a widow and three sons survived Dr. Mackey] the 
  assurance of our sincere and respectful sympathy, and direct that an attested 
  copy of this minute be transmitted to them."
   
  
  ----o----
   
  TRIAL 
  AND CONVICTION OF AMERICAN MASONIC FEDERATION LEADERS
   
  BY 
  BRO. CHARLES C. HUNT, DEPUTY GRAND SECRETARY, IOWA
   
  The 
  present article concludes Brother Hunt's account of the false claims, the 
  indictment, trial and conviction of The American Masonic Federation, with 
  headquarters at Salt Lake City, of which Mathew McBlain Thomson was president. 
  Brother Hunt's four articles, the first of which appeared in THE BUILDER for 
  September, comprise a complete record of all the important points in the case.
   
  I HAVE 
  already described the false claims made by the American Masonic Federation to 
  Scottish Rite and other Masonic prerogatives in preceding accounts of the 
  trial and conviction of Mathew McBlain Thomson, president of that organization 
  of spurious "Masonry." The reader is requested to consult THE BUILDER for 
  September, October, and November.  In the present instance I shall give an 
  account of the trial held at Salt Lake City, Utah, early in May of this year.
   
  Three 
  distinguished Scotch Masons agreed to accept a subpoena and testify for the 
  Government: they were Brothers David Reid, Joseph Inglis, and John A. 
  Forrest.  David Reid is Grand Secretary of the Grand Lodge of Scotland.  
  Joseph Inglis is Provincial Grand Master of Kincardineshire; also Past Senior 
  Grand Warden of the Grand Lodge; Past Master of both the Rose Croix Chapter 
  and Consistory; and Past Grand Prior of the Knights Templar, and a 
  Thirty-Second degree Mason.  John A. Forrest is Grand Secretary of the Royal 
  Order of Scotland; Past "Provincial Grand Master of Midlothian; Past Master of 
  his Rose Croix Chapter and Consistory, and a Thirty-Second degree Mason.
   
  These 
  brothers testified that Mother Kilwinning Lodge never granted a charter to 
  work any except the Craft degrees, and that none of the so-called higher 
  degrees originated in Scotland.  David Reid testified that he was a member of 
  Mother Kilwinning Lodge, and that she had never granted to any of her daughter 
  lodges power to charter other lodges, and in fact Kilwinning was the only 
  Scotch lodge that ever had chartering power.  Brothers Inglis and Reid both 
  testified that Mother Kilwinning Lodge kept a copy of every charter issued by 
  her and that she had never granted one to a lodge in France, as Thomson 
  claimed she had done.
   
  
  Thomson was asked to show "a history, any place" which supplies the link of 
  granting a charter from Mother Kilwinning Lodge to the Mother Lodge of St. 
  John, of Marseilles, France, but he could not do so.
   
  
  Brothers Reid and Inglis also testified that the Grand Council of Rites was a 
  very small body with no reputation, Masonically, in Scotland.  Brother Inglis 
  first heard of it in 1880 and Brother Reid in 1911.  In 1912 it was 
  practically declared clandestine by the Grand lodge of Scotland, and her 
  members forbidden to affiliate with it.  Thereupon, Peter Spence, who had 
  signed Thomson's Patent, withdrew from it.
   
  In 
  1914 Thomson and Robert Jamieson were expelled from Masonry by the Grand Lodge 
  of Scotland on the charge of conferring clandestine Masonic degrees.
   
  On 
  cross-examination Thomson was asked to name a Scotch history that anywhere 
  mentioned the Grand Council of Rites, and he could not do so.  He was also 
  compelled to acknowledge that the leading Scotch historian, D. Murray Lyon, 
  did not mention this so-called Grand Council.
   
  
  Thomson claimed to have been made a Mason in a lodge which had been chartered 
  by Melrese St. Johns Lodge, but David Reid testified that this lodge never 
  chartered daughter lodges, and that the lodge from which Thomson claimed a 
  charter, if it ever existed, was clandestine; that Thomson did not become a 
  Mason until after he was healed in 1889, in St. James Lodge No. 125.
   
  In 
  this connection the following extracts from the Proceedings of the Grand Lodge 
  of Scotland are interesting:
   
  From 
  Proceedings of meeting of April 29, 1880:
   
  
  "Memorial anent the clandestine introduction of Mathew Thomson into Lodge 
  operative, Ayr, No. 138, and the issuing of a diploma in his favour.
   
  "The 
  Committee having considered the whole case, Find that Mathew Thomson is not a 
  Freemason, and that he could not therefore be affiliated to the Lodge 
  Operative, Ayr: Find that certain of the Office-Bearers of that lodge knew 
  that Mr. Thomson was not a member of the Order when they pretended to 
  affiliate him: Find that the return made by the lodge to Grand Lodge under 
  date June 12, 1876, certifying that Mr. Thomson was Entered, Passed and Raised 
  in that lodge, was false and fraudulent: Find that lodge has produced no 
  regular books, and that such as have been produced are in many places written 
  in pencil and grossly irregular, and contain no evidence of Mr. Thomson's 
  pretended affiliation: Therefore recommend Grand Lodge to instruct the name of 
  the said Mathew Thomson to be deleted from the Register of Intrants, and 
  ordain him to deliver up the Diploma of Membership issued on 12th June 1876; 
  and further recommend that Grand Lodge suspend the Lodge Operative, Ayr, No. 
  138, and debar it from meeting for Masonic purposes until it is the pleasure 
  of the Grand Lodge to withdraw its suspension.  Further, instruct the Grand 
  Secretary to call for delivery of the charter and minute and other books of 
  the lodge, if any such exist, and retain the same in his possession."
   
   
  From 
  Proceedings of Meeting of June 24, 1880:
   
  "Grand 
  Secretary produced the diploma which had been issued to Mr. Mathew Thomson, 
  under a false return in name of the Lodge Operative, Ayr, No. 138, in June 
  1876, and tabled a letter from the Lodge St. James, Ayr, No. 125, anent the 
  admission of the said Mathew Thomson by affiliation or otherwise, as Grand 
  Committee may direct.  Remitted to the Petitions and Complaints Committee to 
  consider and report."
   
  From 
  Proceedings of Meeting of July 29, 1880:
   
  "On 
  the recommendation of the Sub-Committee on Petitions and Complaints, Grand 
  Secretary was instructed to direct the Lodge St. James, Newton-on-Ayr, No. 
  125, as to the admission of Mr. Mathew Thomson referred to in the minute of 
  Grand Committee of date 24th June last, - and on being satisfied that the 
  conditions on which the applicant's admission is authorized have been complied 
  with, to issue a new diploma to the said Mathew Thomson."
   
  Thus 
  it is seen that this is not the first time that Thomson has been concerned 
  with clandestine Masonry.
   
  In 
  March 1911 Thomson published the following account of a visit paid by him to 
  David Reid, Grand Secretary of Scotland:
   
  "From 
  London we went to Edinburgh, where, we visited the Grand Secretary in the 
  temporary offices of the Grand Lodge in Charlotte Square, the Grand Lodge Hall 
  being closed for repairs and enlargement.  We sent in our card as President of 
  the A.M.F. and were received as such and had a long and pleasant talk with 
  him, in the course of which we informed him of conditions here, conditions 
  which made necessary the formation of the A.M.F., explained to him the source 
  from which we derived our authority, showed him our charters and explained to 
  him our aims and objects; showed him from our publications that we made no 
  claim whatever to have authority from or connection with the Grand Lodge of 
  Scotland; that we did claim Scottish ancestry, but from a source more ancient 
  than the Grand Lodge, namely from the Mother Lodge Kilwinning, through her 
  son, the Chevalier Ramsay, through whom the degrees went to the Scottish 
  Mother Lodge of Marseilles, from thence through the Lodge Polar Star, 
  established in New Orleans in 1794, to the Supreme Council of Louisiana; from 
  it to the Grand Lodge Inter-Montana, which is the foundation of the A.M.F.
   
  
  "Brother Reid informed us (as we had been informed before) that the only 
  object that the Grand Lodge of Scotland had in the matter was representation 
  made to her that an officer of Grand Lodge (Brother Peter Spence) was granting 
  Blue Lodge charters to parties in America; and that the A.M.F. claimed to work 
  by authority from the Grand Lodge of Scotland; the first charge had been 
  disproved by Brother Spence, and what I said now had disposed of the latter."
   
  SCORED 
  AS A FALSEHOOD
   
  
  Brother Reid testified that the only true part of this account was the fact of 
  the call.  The interview was very short, about two minutes only.  He had 
  remained standing throughout.  The only other person present was Brother 
  Joseph Inglis.  Thomson had not shown any charters or made any explanation of 
  his aims or objects, neither had he shown any publications or made any 
  explanations of his claims.  Brother Inglis testified that the conversation 
  was very formal; that Mr. Reid never sat down and practically bowed him out.  
  He was asked if the meeting was a courteous or discourteous one.  He replied: 
  "lt was cold, but courteous."
   
  On 
  cross-examination Thomson was asked in regard to this interview, and admitted 
  that the conversation lasted about ten minutes, that he had shown no charters, 
  but had shown his authority, by handing Mr. Reid a copy of his magazine, which 
  explained his authority, but he could not tell which copy it was or what 
  article he referred to as giving the authority.  On being recalled, Brothers 
  Reid and Inglis testified that Thomson had left no magazine or documents of 
  any kind whatever.
   
  
  Bergers, one of the defendants, testified that in 1913 he went to Europe to 
  investigate for himself to find out what he could about the organization, and 
  how it was regarded there.  He visited the Grand Council of Rites, the meeting 
  of which was postponed one month so that he could be there.  At this meeting 
  there were twenty-eight persons present, and the meeting lasted about three or 
  four hours in the afternoon.
   
  He 
  went to Ayr and visited St. James Lodge there.  The members of the lodge had 
  not been informed of his coming but the Master called a meeting after his 
  arrival. In answer to the question: "How did he call the members together?" 
  Bergera replied:
   
  "They 
  were called by telephone, where I saw several other brothers, and they gave me 
  an introduction.  They told me it was the Master of St. James 125, and they 
  said - I said, I desire to visit the lodge, and they said 'very well' they 
  were going to have their regular meeting that night and also they were working 
  the Craft degrees on one of the candidates." 
   
  
  However, the meeting was held in the afternoon, instead of at night, to 
  accommodate some visitors who wished to return home that night.
   
  
  Bergera was in Scotland ten days and visited two lodges. The second lodge was 
  the lodge in Kilmarnock, which met in a building with the name "Kilmarnock 
  Lodge" over the door. Brothers Reid and Inglis testified that there were four 
  lodges in Kilmarnock, but none of them with that name; that there was no 
  building there with the name  "Kilmarnock Lodge" above the door, and that the 
  building in which the lodges met had simply the inscription "Masonic Hall."
   
  
  Bergera testified that he had not visited, nor attempted to visit, the Grand 
  Lodge of Scotland. He spent five days in London, and visited one lodge there, 
  but he did not visit nor attempt to visit the Grand Lodge of England. He spent 
  nine or ten days in Paris and visited one lodge, but had not visited nor 
  attempted to visit the Grand Orient or Grand Lodge of France. Thus, although 
  he testified that his sole purpose in going to Europe was to investigate the 
  standing of his organization, and he spent several days in each place, he 
  visited only two lodges in Scotland, one in London and one in Paris, and did 
  not attempt to go anywhere where authoritative information could be had.
   
  
  Thomson gave considerable space in his magazine to the Proceedings of the 
  National Masonic Congress, in Zurich, Switzerland, in 1920, supposed to be 
  composed of the representatives of the Masonic powers of the world, and of 
  which he was elected President. On cross-examination he could name but eight 
  people who were present at that Congress, and Joseph Inglis testified that 
  none of the powers there represented was considered regular by the Grand Lodge 
  of Scotland.
   
  
  THOMSON MADE A FORTUNE
   
  
  Mention has been made that considerable money was collected by this 
  organization, and that Thomson could not, or would not, tell what had become 
  of it. According to the testimony, the following fees were charged:
   
  Grand 
  Lodge Charter
  
   Election ----------------- $50.00
  
   Confirmation -------------  25.00
  Lodge 
  Charter -------------  25.00
  Master 
  Mason's Diploma ----   5.00
  Mark 
  Master's Diploma -----   4.00
  
  Affiliation Diploma -------   2.50
  
  Duplicate Diploma ---------   2.00
  Past 
  Master's Diploma -----   2.50
  
  Dispensations -------------   5.00
  
  Catechisms, each degree ---    .15
   
  
  Minimum fee for Craft Degrees, $35.00; of which the lodge received $5.00.
  
  Minimum fee for higher degrees, Fourth to Thirty-Third, $135.00, of which 
  $25.00 was for paraphernalia.
   
  The 
  thirty-three degrees were sometimes given in an hour's time; frequently all of 
  them were conferred in one evening.
   
  There 
  were many other facts brought out in the trial but I have here mentioned only 
  the leading ones.  From this it will be seen that the Government clearly 
  proved that Thomson obtained his members by misrepresenting the facts, both as 
  to his authority and regularity, also as to the recognition that his members 
  would receive from Masons abroad, and that in the promotion of his scheme the 
  United States mails were used.
   
  The 
  jury brought in a verdict of guilty against each of the defendants on every 
  count charged in the indictment.  In this connection it is well to remember 
  that neither the Judge nor any member of the jury were members of the Masonic 
  fraternity. The regular Judge of the Utah District of the United States 
  District Court is a Mason; to avoid any charge of prejudice an outside judge, 
  Judge Wade of Iowa, was assigned to try the case.  In giving his instructions 
  to the jury, among other things, he said:
   
  
  "Therefore, gentlemen, as I said in the beginning, this involves no case here 
  before this jury as to which of the branches of the Masonic order is 
  legitimate, except in so far as that question inheres in the simple questions 
  in this case, which is not a question of determining which of these great 
  branches, or minor branches, is right or wrong, but the question here is, did 
  these men on trial conspire to commit a fraud on their neighbours or on their 
  fellow men? That I will go into more fully.  Keep that in mind.
   
  "It is 
  a historic matter of common knowledge that there is an organization known as 
  Free Masons or Free and Accepted Masons, or Masons, known for many 
  generations. Whether that organization is right or wrong, whether it had 
  conducted its business in the right way, whether its spirit is right or wrong, 
  speaking generally, we have nothing to do with it. . . ."
   
  
  "Sometime back, the people of this country, acting through their agents, 
  enacted a statute through Congress which said that a man who should conceive 
  and organize a conspiracy with others to defraud somebody, and then use the 
  mails to carry out that scheme, that man should be punished.  Now that is all 
  the Grand Jury in this Court did when last year it brought in this 
  indictment.  And bear in mind, gentlemen, as I tried to impress upon you 
  before, that the action of the Grand Jury must not in any manner enter into 
  your consideration in determining the question of guilt. . . ."
   
  "So 
  this indictment was brought in charging these three defendants with having 
  done three specific things; combined, organized or maintained a conspiracy, 
  with the intent to defraud, and used the mails for carrying out that fraud.  
  That is all.  The Grand Jury didn't indict anybody here for competing with 
  some other organization of Masonry, had nothing to do with those 
  organizations, whatsoever, neither do we.
   
  "They 
  charged that they conceived a plan to defraud and used the mails to carry it 
  out, and that they did that by conspiring together, making an arrangement to 
  carry it out."
   
  A CASE 
  OF FRAUD
   
  He 
  then quoted from the indictment, and said:
   
  "You 
  will observe now from this recital, or these recitals, that this is not a mere 
  case of a dispute of title. That is involved in it, but that is not all that 
  is involved in it. It is not a mere case of the question as to whether or not 
  they got power under this endorsement on this charter from Louisiana Council.  
  Nor is it solely the question as to the standing or authority of the Council 
  of Rites of Scotland.  These questions are involved, but there are many other 
  questions involved.
   
  "Of 
  course now, any change in this indictment, which is not proven by the evidence 
  must not be considered.  I am reading it to try to get to your minds what we 
  are trying to settle in this matter.  The Government charges in this 
  indictment that these things were in the minds and hearts of these people; 
  that they were false, all of them were false, though of course it is not 
  essential for the Government to prove that all of them were false in order to 
  convict; it is only necessary that they shall prove beyond a reasonable doubt 
  that the fraud which they claim they had in mind consisted of some one or more 
  of the things which they had conceived, sufficient to constitute a fraud.
   
  "To 
  illustrate, if somebody sold you a piece of land - or to make it more 
  practical, if someone sold you a certain horse, representing to you that he 
  was an expert in the genealogy of this horse and that his breeding was of a 
  certain strain on back two or three generations, which made it a valuable 
  horse, and he also represented to you that the horse had a record upon a 
  lawful track of 2:05 as a trotter, and the man who was buying him relied upon 
  these statements, and had no opportunity of testing them out to see whether 
  they were true, and later he found that he did have this family tree which was 
  valuable, but he also found out that he never made that record at all, that 
  was a lie, that would be a fraud by which he induced him to part with his 
  money, although only the question of his record was involved in the fraud, the 
  other representation being true.
   
  "So 
  that, even if it were established in a given case where the question of the 
  family tree, so to speak, of some society, the Odd Fellows, Masons, Knights of 
  Columbus, Elks, whatever it might be, was a certain thing, if that was the 
  only thing alleged, and it was not proven that was false, of course there 
  would be no fraud, but if in connection with that representation were made 
  other representations with relation to the quality of the organization, or 
  character of the organization, the benefits of the organization, the thing the 
  man was getting for his money, aside from the question of the family tree; if 
  false representations were made which induced him to part with his money, that 
  is to say, representations which were wilfully false, then of course there 
  would be fraud and the plan to represent these things which were wilfully and 
  intentionally false, would constitute the ground for a conviction, if they 
  were within the things charged in the indictment . . . . "
   
  "A 
  false representation may be by word of mouth, it may be by acts, it may be 
  silence; it may be by all combined.  We consider what effect the particular 
  thing, the particular act would naturally have on the mind of the other 
  fellow.  To determine what the natural effect would be upon the mind of the 
  other fellow we have got to sort of look at it from the other fellow's 
  standpoint, and consider the question with relation, for instance, to 
  membership in this organization.  What did the other fellow want the 
  membership for? What did he think he was getting? What did he in fact get? Did 
  he get what he bought? If not, was his failure to get what he bought and paid 
  for the result of misrepresentations either by word or conduct or act, in 
  writing or orally, by the defendants or any of them or any of their authorized 
  agents, authorized to do the things that they did? That is this case.
   
  "As I 
  recall there was evidence here of representation made to parties, witnesses 
  upon the stand here, that membership in these organizations opened the doors 
  of the lodge rooms of Europe, and all countries, generally speaking, or words 
  to that effect, to the member that was sought to join.  I am not stating words 
  exactly, and I am only using this as illustrating the principles involved. You 
  are the final judges of what the acts are.  But if a man were induced to enter 
  an organization of any kind upon a representation that membership in that 
  organization would grant him affiliation and brotherhood relations with some 
  great established, organized, permanent organization in South America or 
  Canada or any other country, if that were not true, and the man that made the 
  representation knew it was not true, and he made the representation with the 
  intention of getting his money, that would be a fraud, even though the 
  organization had the right genealogical tree.
   
  "So, 
  gentlemen, we have an organization here now, composed of a number of 
  individuals with organizers employed and sent out, and memberships taken and 
  memberships paid for.  In any big organization you will find some organizer or 
  some agent who at times will not do the right thing.  But a wrongful act upon 
  the part of an agent or organizer, except insofar as the same was induced or 
  authorized or approved by the defendants in this particular case - if it was 
  outside of his regular and authorized work, of course it would not be binding 
  upon these defendants, - but insofar as you can find from the evidence the 
  scope and power given by these defendants knowingly and intentionally to 
  organizers, of course the acts of such organizers would be the same as the 
  acts of the defendants.
   
  "So, 
  gentlemen, you see it is a question as to whether or not the Government has 
  proven - they have got to prove that these things were false, the defendants 
  do not have to prove that they are true, the burden is on the Government all 
  the way through.  Has the Government proven any of these charges of intended 
  misrepresentation or fraud which they set out in this indictment? If so, was 
  that of such a nature or character that it would have carried out - 
  constituted a fraud on the person who was induced to join as a member? Now, 
  what the evidence is and what these specific things are, you are to determine.
   
  "I 
  have repeatedly said that a fraud is not a mistake.  The law is practical 
  common sense.  No man was ever convicted of a fraud when he was acting in good 
  faith.  A man might sue to recover money or land on the ground of mutual 
  mistake but as to a criminal offense, a man to be convicted of a fraud must 
  have knowledge, must have the wrongful intent and purpose."
   
  
  Thomson and his partners in crime were found guilty.  In passing sentence 
  Judge Wade scored them after the following manner:
   
  
  "Nobody can hear this evidence in this case without being convinced, 
  absolutely convinced, that this thing has been a fraudulent scheme from the 
  beginning.  I can see where an ignorant person might find some possible excuse 
  for the methods employed in this case.  For intelligent people and experienced 
  people to try to convince the Court that this organization and this plan and 
  this work that had been going on is on the square - it can't be done.
   
  "Of 
  course now we are living in a time when some of the brightest minds in the 
  country are devoting themselves to securing money by short cuts, by taking 
  advantage of the gullible for their enterprises. In fact that is one of the 
  dominant crimes of the present time. I know of one state in which in the last 
  two years, within two, there has been sold over twenty-nine million dollars 
  worth of stock in packing houses which were never built, and practically every 
  dollar of the money lost, just by shrewd practices, by trying to get the other 
  fellow's money in some way without working for it.
   
  
  AMERICAN MASONIC FEDERATION A FRAUD
   
  "Now, 
  of course, after all that was stated in this case from the beginning and all 
  through I confess that I was astounded when I heard Mr. Thomson testify that 
  there was no pretence, that there was no record anywhere of a charter to 
  Marseilles Lodge, on the existence of which lay the right and practically the 
  foundation of all claims of legitimacy on that branch of the case and to have 
  him admit that such a lodge existed only in tradition (I realize that some 
  things can be proven by tradition, but tradition cannot exist with one man, 
  tradition must have, before it has any force as proof - such general 
  recognition among men in that particular occupation or relation that it forces 
  itself upon the mind as a truth the record of which has been lost) and it was 
  conceded on the witness stand that so far as this particular thing was 
  concerned there was no record anywhere and no one who was skilled in the 
  history of Masonry had ever met any such a tradition so far as the record in 
  this case is concerned, in any history or book or pamphlet or anything else 
  outside of this organization.
   
  "So 
  was I surprised when I found that the Council of Rites of Scotland which had 
  been one of the chief points urged by these gentlemen, had no record behind it 
  but a few years and it was represented - entirely aside from the question of 
  the origin and history of this organization and those that preceded it - it 
  was represented time and time again without dispute to these poor devils that 
  were led largely by these attractions to an ancient organization and to the 
  rites and rituals of the organization, it was represented to them specifically 
  and it has not been denied that by virtue of their association with this 
  organization the doors of Masonry the world over were open to them outside of 
  the United States, which is of course an absurd claim under the evidence in 
  this case.
   
  "Then 
  the trip that Bergera made to Europe on the investigation, in view of what 
  transpired according to his own testimony, has all the appearance of being a 
  scheme or plan that he might come back here and state to those whose 
  membership was sought his capacity to enter the lodges of Europe to support 
  their claim, that the members immediately on getting across the water would 
  have the doors wide open to them.
   
  "And 
  then after making a trip and going to one or two lodges or three under 
  peculiar circumstances, in fact never going to the Grand Lodge of Scotland, 
  and that was included in the representation made, that is to say, all Europe 
  was included, never going to the Grand Lodge of Scotland, the Grand Lodge of 
  England and never going to the Grand Lodge of France, whatever it is called, 
  and coming back here no doubt to back up the representation that membership in 
  this organization was opening the doors of all Masonic Orders, all of the 
  regular Masonic Orders in Europe - it was a pretence, gentlemen, you can't 
  come to any other conclusion. If Bergera went over there for the purpose of 
  confirming what these organizers were representing and which is not denied 
  here, he certainly would have gone to the Grand Lodge of Scotland or England 
  or France or Germany or somewhere to find out whether the doors would be open 
  to these fellows that were joining their ranks.
   
  "But 
  it is not necessary to recite the details.  One cannot listen to this evidence 
  without being forced to the conclusion that so far as the representation as to 
  the standing and the brotherhood and the association of people with which they 
  would become immediately affiliated was concerned, that aside entirely from 
  the genealogy of the lodge, nobody can claim that there was any truth in what 
  was said except insofar as they had access to certain lodges with which Mr. 
  Thomson through his relation had some affiliation.
   
  "The 
  spectacle of Mr. Thomson going to Switzerland to this great conference, and 
  parading afterwards through the journal a conference where eight men from the 
  entire world were present - that in itself is sufficient to condemn the whole 
  thing and the manner in which this business had been done is sufficient in 
  itself.  No pretence here on the part of the defendants that this money was 
  kept in any businesslike way for the benefit of this organization.  What 
  became of it I don't know but there was more than a million dollars taken in 
  here, of that there can be no question in view of the prices charged for 
  little printed sheets of paper in the form of diplomas and certificates and 
  things of that kind, entirely aside from the membership fee.  What became of 
  that money is not indicated here.  The head of this organization testified 
  before the Court that he didn't know and in fact had some difficulty in 
  recalling whether there was ever an account of the organization in a bank 
  anywhere in the world.
   
  "As 
  far as the Secretary is concerned, there is no suggestion of a report 
  indicating that this business was conducted as an honest organization, not a 
  word.
   
  "So 
  that, gentlemen, there is only one thing for the Court to do. If it were not 
  for the age of Mr. Thomson at this time there would be a long prison sentence, 
  because I think he is the chief actor. I think he is more responsible than 
  anyone else.  As far as Bergera is concerned, of course, I cannot understand 
  at all how a man would presume to parade himself as the Treasurer-General of 
  the organization of ten thousand members which had received from them in the 
  neighbourhood of a million or more dollars and never handle a cent of the 
  money.  I cannot understand it at all, that is all, that any honest man would 
  allow his name to be used in that connection under such condition and the 
  concealment of the methods of doing business and where this money went even up 
  to the present time.  I cannot comprehend the whole thing.
   
  "There 
  is only one thing that saves these men a long prison term. I don't feel 
  justified in sending any of these men to prison any longer than I do Mr. 
  Thomson.  As I say, when it comes to this point in a trial of the case, the 
  charity of the law asserts itself.  Old age and sickness, of course, have a 
  strong appeal to the Court, when it comes to the question of a prison term and 
  I think that the District Attorney has been very generous in his suggestion.  
  This Court hasn't really any power to impose a penalty here which would be 
  adequate punishment for this thing that has been going on when we stop to 
  think of the honest fellows who parted with their fifty or seventy-five or a 
  hundred and fifty dollars for membership in this organization.  So far as the 
  evidence in this case is concerned, not one dollar of it was ever used for any 
  of the business of the society except to carry on this work of getting 
  members.  Not a word of charity or charitable fund or anything of that kind 
  before this Court.
   
  "I am 
  very much inclined to be lenient in all things.  I am inclined to look in a 
  charitable way upon the mistakes of men, but this thing has in it that 
  deliberateness and continuous conduct which sort of overcomes my tendency.
   
  "Stand 
  up, gentlemen.
   
  "The 
  judgment of this Court is that each one of you serve a period of two years in 
  Fort Leavenworth Prison and each one of you pay a fine of five thousand 
  dollars and costs."
   
  THE 
  POINT OF THE TRIAL
   
  Before 
  this case went to trial it was not known just what matters the Court would 
  require the Government to prove.  Thomson's claim as to the regularity of the 
  established Masonic institutions before mentioned in the first part of this 
  paper, the Government was prepared to disprove, had the Court so ruled.  
  However, the ruling of the Court was that the regularity of the established 
  Masonic lodges did not enter into this case, and the following named witnesses 
  who had been summoned by the Government were not called upon to testify, 
  although they were instructed to be on hand in case they were needed, and 
  especially to listen to the testimony offered by the defendants' witnesses: 
  Frederick W. Hamilton, Grand Secretary, Grand Lodge of Massachusetts; William 
  L. Boyden, Librarian of the Supreme Council, Washington, D.C.; Charles A. 
  Conover, General Grand Secretary, General Grand Chapter, R.A.M. of the United 
  States; Robert A. Shirrefs, Grand Secretary General, Northern Supreme Council; 
  Ossian Lang, Historian, Grand Lodge of New York, and Charles C. Hunt, Deputy 
  Grand Secretary, Grand Lodge of Iowa.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  KIT 
  CARSON - A MASON OF THE FRONTIER
   
  BY 
  BRO. F.T. CHEETHAM, NEW MEXICO
   
  It has 
  often been observed that 1809 was, of all the years of its century, most 
  prodigal in giving to the world great men, for it was during that twelve-month 
  that Lincoln, Darwin, Gladstone, Tennyson, Holmes, Poe, Edward Fitzgerald, 
  etc., etc, were born.  After reading the following appreciations of Kit Carson 
  ye editor believes that many readers will feel inclined to add to the list of 
  illustrious men born in 1809 that of this pioneer who, despite the crudity of 
  his environment and the roughness of his work, was a gentleman and a hero.  It 
  is high time that Kit Carson was rescued from dime novels and schoolboy 
  romances and delivered back to serious history and biography where mature men 
  may learn what a towering man he was.  Brother Cheetham made his researches 
  expressly at the request of THE BUILDER and thereby became deserving of our 
  heartiest thanks, which are hereby rendered in full measure.
   
   
  WHEN 
  THE WRITER first set out to write a sketch of this worthy brother he was 
  confronted by a dearth of reliable information as to Kit Carson's Masonic 
  record that rendered the task discouraging.  When the question was asked of 
  those few remaining brothers in the Craft who knew him they would invariably 
  shrug their shoulders after the custom of the country and say, "I don't know." 
  It was not until after a trip was made by the writer to Santa Fe and an 
  extended search was made among the records of the old Montezuma Lodge which 
  worked under a Missouri charter, now in the archives of Montezuma Lodge No. 1 
  of New Mexico, that any definite information was obtained as to the time and 
  place of the initiation, passing, and raising of the late Brother Carson.  It 
  is true that the Grand Lodge of New Mexico had erected a stone, the third of 
  such memorials, over his grave in Taos, also an iron fence around the grave; 
  and it was generally known and asserted that he was in fact a Freemason, but 
  that does not satisfy the student of history.
   
  
  Brother Carson was born in Madison County, Kentucky, December 24th, 1809.  
  While very young he migrated with his parents to Howard County, Missouri, 
  where he obtained what little education he ever received, except in the school 
  of the great out-of-doors.  When but sixteen he joined a party en route for 
  Santa Fe and soon after his arrival at that place he proceeded to Fernando de 
  Taos, or Taos as it is called for short, which thereafter became "home" to him 
  during the remainder of his days.
   
  From 
  that time on he led a very active life, having been consecutively engaged in 
  the occupations of trapper, hunter, trader, scout, guide, soldier and Indian 
  agent.  The range of his activities extended from Chihuahua on the south to 
  the Canadian frontier on the north; from the city of Washington, whither he 
  went a number of times on official business, on the east, to the limpid waters 
  of the Pacific, on the west.  In fact we have obtained a photograph of him, 
  taken in Boston.  He made at least five trips, possibly seven, to California 
  and when we consider that all his travels west of Westport were accomplished 
  on horseback, we must admit that his was a life of activity. He was chief 
  scout and guide of the first three of the Fremont expeditions all of which 
  were successful; and while he did not accompany the General on the fourth 
  ill-fated expedition, yet it fell his lot to shelter that great man from the 
  storm.  The General in writing home to his wife about the disastrous 
  expedition, from Taos, on January 27, 1849, said in part:-
   
  "I 
  write you from the house of our good friend Carson.  This morning a cup of 
  chocolate was brought me, while yet in bed.  To an overworn, overworked, much 
  fatigued and starving traveller, these little luxuries of the world offer an 
  interest which in your comfortable home it is not possible for you to 
  conceive.  While in the enjoyment of this luxury, then, I pleased myself in 
  imagining how gratified you would be in picturing me here in Kit's care, whom 
  you will fancy constantly occupied and constantly uneasy in endeavouring to 
  make me comfortable.  How little could you have dreamed of this while he was 
  enjoying the pleasant hospitality of your father's house! The furthest thing 
  then from your mind was that he would ever repay me here." (1)
   
  There 
  can be no doubt that Brother Carson was prepared to become a Mason in his 
  heart for some time before he presented himself for initiation.  His early 
  associations with Governor Bent, Colonel St. Vrain, both of whom were Masons, 
  and with General Fremont, who no doubt was also a member, predisposed him to a 
  favourable opinion of the Fraternity.
   
  We 
  know that while he was with Fremont in California a movement headed by 
  Eugerilo Macnamara, a Catholic priest, was set on foot to drive out or 
  exterminate all Americans, the objects thereof being stated in a memorial 
  addressed to the Mexican President, as follows:
   
  "I 
  propose, with the aid and approbation of your excellency, to place in Upper 
  California a colony of Irish Catholics.  I have a triple object in making this 
  proposition.  I wish, in the first place, to advance the cause of Catholicism. 
  In the second, to contribute to the happiness of my countrymen.  Thirdly, I 
  desire to put an obstacle in the way of further usurpations on the part of an 
  irreligious and anti-Catholic nation." (2)
   
  Carson 
  knew of the prompt action of General Fremont in saving the American 
  inhabitants of Upper or Northern California from massacre by prosecuting what 
  was known locally as the "Bear Flag War"; and that by his promptness, energy 
  and skill he reduced the northern half of the Territory, in all of which 
  Carson was a participant.  He knew that when Admiral Sir George Seymore, with 
  the priest Macnamara on board, arrived at Monterey to raise the British flag, 
  the Stars and Stripes were already floating over the city, nailed to the 
  masthead and there to stay.
   
  As a 
  testimonial to Kit's fame at that time, we have Lieutenant Walpole, an officer 
  in the British Admiral's fleet, who in writing home to London said in part, in 
  describing Fremont's army:
   
  "He 
  has one or two with him who enjoy a high reputation in the prairies.  Kit 
  Carson is as well known there as a duke is in Europe."
   
  When 
  Brother Carson returned to New Mexico, he found that his brother-in-law, 
  Charles Bent, who was the first American Civil Governor of New Mexico and a 
  Freemason, together with others of his closest and most intimate friends, had 
  been assassinated in a most cruel and inhuman manner; and that religious 
  fanaticism had sought to accomplish by the firebrand and dagger what the 
  soldier had not dared to attempt with the sword.
   
  And so 
  in our pilgrimage to Santa Fe we learned that Christopher Carson was duly 
  initiated an Entered Apprentice March 29, 1854, was passed June 17 and raised 
  December 26 of the same year.  He was living at the time at Rayado in what is 
  now Colfax county. To attend lodge he was obliged to travel approximately 150 
  miles and in that day he probably made the trip on horseback.  But to a man 
  who had time and again shown himself ever ready and willing to go on foot and 
  out of his way to relieve any person in distress that was nothing.
   
  That 
  Brother Carson practised true Masonic charity is evidenced by the following 
  story, which to my knowledge has never been published and which was obtained 
  by the writer from his niece, who, after the assassination of her father, 
  Governor Bent, was raised by Carson, and living in the household at the time 
  of its happening.  It is in substance as follows:
   
  Carson 
  had learned that the Comanches had a slave, a white boy about twelve years of 
  age.  He there-upon fitted out a pack outfit or train, hired a couple of 
  natives and furnished them with trinkets and other articles to trade and 
  barter with the Indians, with whom they were on friendly terms at the time.  
  They went out and located the Comanches and purchased the boy and brought him 
  back.  When he was brought in he was hardly distinguishable from an Indian. 
  Carson had him cleaned up and provided with new clothes.  He then tried to 
  converse with him in English, Spanish and French, all to no avail.  He then 
  called in a gentleman who spoke German.  When the lad heard his mother tongue, 
  for he proved to be German, he began crying.  He was given to understand that 
  he was among friends.  He then gave his name, his father's name and the place 
  in Texas from whence he had been stolen.  Carson then fitted out another 
  outfit and sent him home and restored him to his parents, bearing the whole 
  expense himself, the boy's people having been in poor circumstances.
   
  At 
  another time, two women, who had been captured in Mexico by the Comanches and 
  carried off as slaves, upon learning that Carson with a party was at the time 
  in the neighbourhood of the tribe, made their escape to him and he sent them 
  back to their people in Mexico, at his own expense.
   
  
  Another incident, hitherto unpublished, and one that reveals his patriotism, 
  was related to me by the late Captain Smith H. Simpson, who knew Carson for 
  fifteen years prior to the latter's death.  The Captain said that in the 
  Spring of 1868, just after Carson had returned from one of his official trips 
  (he was Indian Agent at the time) they were walking up the west side of the 
  plaza in Taos.  Carson said to Simpson, "Do you see that flag up there?" 
  pointing to the American flag floating over the plaza.  Simpson replied, 
  "Yes." Carson then said, "Well I have kept that up since 'Forty Seven.  I am 
  not going to be here much longer.  I want you to see that flag stays up." He 
  "passed over the great divide" about two months later, aged 58 years.
   
  For 
  contemporary comment on his life and character, we look to the first issue of 
  The Pueblo Chieftain, which said:-
   
  "DEATH 
  OF KIT CARSON.  The melancholy intelligence reaches us that General Kit Carson 
  is no more.  He died at his residence on the Las Animas on the 24th inst, of 
  disease of the heart.  General Carson was a Kentuckian by birth, removed early 
  in life to the State of Missouri, and while yet a mere boy became a wanderer 
  on the vast plains of the then known regions of the West.  From about the age 
  of seventeen years until fifty he lived the life of a hunter, trader and 
  trapper.  He early explored and became familiar with the mountains and plains 
  from the Missouri to the Pacific ocean.  During all these years of his wild 
  life he was constantly exposed to every hardship and danger; sometimes making 
  his home with some tribe of the Indians and assisting them in their wars 
  against other tribes; sometimes employed as a trapper by some mountain trader; 
  sometimes trading on his own account between New Mexico and California.  His 
  home was always the wilderness, and danger was his constant companion. Unaided 
  by the advantages of education or patronage, by the forces of indomitable, 
  energy and will, by chivalrous courage, by tireless labour and self denial, he 
  rose step by step, until his name had become as familiar to the American 
  People as a household word.  He stood preeminent among the pathfinders and 
  founders of empire in the Great West, and his long career, ennobled by 
  hardship and danger, is unsullied by a record of littleness or meanness.  He 
  was nature's model of a gentleman.  Kindly of heart, tolerant to all men, good 
  in virtues of disposition, rather than great in qualities of mind, he has 
  passed away - dying as through his life he had lived - in peace and charity 
  with all men, and leaving behind him a name and memory to be cherished by his 
  countrymen so long as modesty, valour, unobtrusive worth, charity and true 
  chivalry survive among men.  Of his precise age we are not advised, but judge 
  he was very near sixty years of age.  He leaves children of tender age to 
  mourn his loss."
   
  Kit 
  Carson had many fights with the Indians while on hunting and trapping 
  expeditions.  Of his many deeds of valour we mention but one or two.  One 
  occurred while with Fremont, when Carson was leading a party of six scouts as 
  an advanced guard in southern Oregon.  The Klamath Indians had been giving 
  trouble, even to making a night attack and killing some of Fremont's men.  The 
  latter decided to chastise the Indians.  He therefore sent Carson on ahead to 
  locate them.  Carson and his men came suddenly upon a Klamath village.  
  Sending a runner back for the main party, his party and the Indians each 
  attacked simultaneously.  When Fremont arrived on the scene the village was in 
  flames and such Indians as survived were in full flight.
   
  We 
  might mention another instance.  When General Kearney was surrounded by the 
  Mexican forces in Southern California, Carson and Lieutenant Beale of the Navy 
  volunteered and made their way through the Mexican lines, reached the sea 
  coast and secured men and munitions for the relief of Kearney.
   
  Carson 
  was chief scout and guide of the Saguache campaign against the Utes, under 
  Colonels Fontleroy and St. Vrain, in which the Indians got a whipping that 
  they never forgot.
   
  About 
  1863 Carson was made Colonel of the First New Mexico Cavalry, and one of his 
  first military operations was against the Kiowas and Comanches, culminating in 
  a battle near the old adobe fort, formerly erected by Bent and St. Vrain on 
  the Canadian River in Texas.  These Indians had made a great deal of trouble 
  for years, but they were cured in the fight at the "Adobe Walls," as the fight 
  was called.
   
  But 
  Carson's greatest military achievement was his Navaho campaign.  The writer 
  has talked with men who were on the ground during that campaign; and in his 
  humble opinion that achievement alone lifted General Carson to the front rank 
  of American Indian fighters.  The Spaniards had waged a war aging the Navahos 
  for two hundred years.  Mexico had continued that war, likewise the United 
  States.  But the Navahos remained defiant and unsubdued.  When the troops 
  would concentrate they would scatter, and when the troops scattered they would 
  concentrate, and with their system of signals and knowledge of the country 
  they were invincible.  Of that campaign we would prefer to stand aside and let 
  a contemporary speak.  Colonel Jas. F. Meline in "Two Thousand Miles on 
  Horseback," in writing of the declaration of war by General Carleton upon the 
  Navahos, said:
   
  "True 
  to his promise, the war opened on the very day set by General Carleton, July 
  20, 1863.  A regiment of New Mexicans, with more than a century of accumulated 
  wrong and oppression to avenge, were at once placed under the command of a man 
  who understood his Indian well - Kit Carson.  These troops knew neither summer 
  rest nor winter quarters but pursued the Indian foe relentlessly month after 
  month, night and day, over mesas and deserts and rivers, under broiling suns 
  and in rough winter snows, killing and capturing them in their most chosen 
  retreats, until finally, broken and dispirited under a chastisement the like 
  of which they never had dreamed of, small bands began to come in voluntarily, 
  then larger ones, and finally groups of fifties and hundreds, nearly 
  comprising the strength of the tribe.  The prisoners, as fast as received, 
  were dispatched to the Bosque Redondo, and those who remained sent out white 
  flags in vain.  Throughout 1864, 1865 and the present year, the war went on 
  under these conditions, and the result is that some eight thousand Navahos, 
  including a few Apaches, are now living peaceably at the Bosque, engaged in 
  agriculture and manufactures, four hundred miles from their old homes, and 
  ninety miles east of Rio Grande Settlement."
   
  This 
  cured the Navahos and they have been "good Indians" ever since. Throughout his 
  career Carson never failed to teach the Indians not only to fear but to trust 
  him.  He was their friend in their hour of need and he spoke five Indian 
  languages besides Spanish and French.  His last official act, so far as the 
  writer has been able to ascertain, was the making of a treaty with the Utes 
  which was transmitted to Congress March 18, 1868. A fitting ending for a man, 
  who by his conduct had set a plumb line in the wilderness, and set a level in 
  the desert and applied the square to all his dealings with his fellow men, who 
  had given his life to win the West for the country he loved.  He was beloved 
  of all who knew him and in enclosing this sketch we wish again to quote from 
  Colonel Meline:
   
  "The 
  pleasantest episode of my visit here has been the society of Kit Carson, with 
  whom I passed three days, I need hardly say delightfully.  He is one of the 
  few men I ever met who can talk long hours to you of what he has seen, and yet 
  say very little about himself.  He has to be drawn out.  I had many questions 
  to ask, and his answers were all marked by great distinctness of memory, 
  simplicity, candour, and a desire to make some one else, rather than himself, 
  the hero of his story."
   
  Such 
  was the manner of the man.
   
  (1) 
  Upham's "Life of Fremont," p. 279.
  (2) 
  Idem p. 230.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  THE 
  FAMOUS TESTIMONIAL TO ALBERT G. MACKEY
   
  BY THE 
  EDITOR
   
  DURING 
  the troublesome times of the Civil War Albert G. Mackey was confined to his 
  home city of Charleston, S. C., where for four years he gave his time, his 
  energies and his substance to the succour of his brethren, little heeding 
  whether they belonged to North or to South, though he himself was a Union 
  man.  Immediately after Charleston, the "cradle of the rebellion," had passed 
  once again into Federal control, Dr. Mackey's brethren of New York City "moved 
  by a common impulse of admiration for the man, of ardent sympathy for the 
  unyielding patriot, of fraternal love for the zealous Mason, determined to 
  invite him to visit them once more, and to receive at their hands a 
  substantial evidence of their sympathy." (I am quoting from a very rare 
  account of the Dr. Mackey Testimonial printed in 1865 by Macoy and Sickels.  
  This copy was signed by Mackey himself and inscribed to the then Grand Master 
  of New York, Clinton F. Paige.)
   
  A call 
  was issued to the Masons of New York City.  They met on the evening of March 
  15, 1865 and at that time adopted, among others, this resolution, that,
   
  
  "Whereas, it has further come to our knowledge that by the vicissitudes of 
  war, our R.'. W.'. Brother has lost his property, and in his declining years 
  been reduced to the sharp necessity of beginning again the battle of life; 
  therefore,
   
  
  "Resolved, That as an earnest of our good will we solicit his acceptance of 
  the voluntary contributions of the brethren........."
   
  A 
  public "Welcome and Testimonial" was held in the Academy of Music on Saturday 
  evening, May 20, 1865, M.'. W.'. Clinton F. Paige presiding. A number of 
  "distinguished artists," along with "Grafulla's Seventh Regiment Full Band," 
  made the occasion memorable.
   
  The 
  center of interest on the occasion was the gracious kindly gentleman from the 
  South in whose honour so large a throng was assembled.  After the music had 
  ceased, and the Grand Master had pronounced a beautiful welcoming address, Dr. 
  Mackey delivered the speech, a part of which succeeds this brief narrative.
   
  This 
  speech, however impressive as it was then - and still is - did not so deeply 
  stir the auditors as the incident that followed, the account of which I 
  transcribe from the record.
   
  "Just 
  as Mme. Salvotti had breathed the last intonation of her song, and before the 
  sounds of her voice had died away, R.'. W.'. Robert Macoy stepped forward and 
  presented Brother Mackey with a beautiful gold snuffbox, of which the 
  following history was given:
   
  "It 
  was stated that this box had before been presented to Brother Mackey by the 
  Masonic fraternity, as a token of gratitude for the many years of faithful 
  servitude he had rendered them.  Shortly after the commencement of the war, 
  however, Brother Mackey was compelled to part with it in order to procure 
  bread for his family.  The box then passed into the hands of a person who took 
  it to Easton, Pa., and gave it to a jeweller to have the inscription erased.  
  This fact becoming known to Brother J. M. Porter, Jr., Past Master of Easton 
  Lodge No. 152, he, with other members of the lodge, having by correspondence 
  with New York become acquainted with its history, purchased it, and sent it to 
  New York to Brother Macoy, with the request that it should in their name be 
  returned to Brother Mackey, with a handsome little present enclosed.  The box 
  has since been kept safely without the knowledge of Brother Mackey, until it 
  was presented to him last evening.  In making the presentation, Brother Macoy 
  briefly explained the above facts, and closed by saying that the box, though 
  beautiful on the outside, had, also, a peculiar inside lining; he would not 
  say exactly what it was, but it looked green (backs).
   
  "It is 
  needless to say that Brother Mackey was taken by surprise at the reappearance 
  of his precious gift, the snuffbox.  He expressed himself much gratified at 
  becoming again the possessor of it, and retired amid the applause of the 
  audience."
   
  It 
  transpired that Dr. Mackey had literally bankrupted himself in order to give 
  assistance to his brethren, even to the extent of his personal belongings.  A 
  venerable brother who was present at the Academy of Music tells me that those 
  who were in attendance left with the feeling that in this Testimonial it was 
  already evident that Masons would take the lead in healing over the breach 
  between the two sections, and that in his own attitude and spirit Dr. Mackey 
  revealed that which so ennobled Abraham Lincoln, - "Malice toward none, 
  charity for all."
   
  
   ----o----
   
  
  Freemasonry is the science of life, taught in a society of men by signs, 
  symbols and ceremonies, having as its basis a system of morality, and for its 
  purposes and aim, the perfection and happiness of the individual and the race. 
  - George F. Moore
   
  
  ----o----
   
  
  FREEMASONRY IN THE CIVIL WAR
   
  BY 
  BROTHER DR. ALBERT G. MACKEY
   
  As 
  explained in the preceding article, a public Testimonial was given to Brother 
  Mackey, author of Mackey's Encyclopedia, Mackey's History of Freemasonry, 
  etc., on the night of May 20th, 1865.  Space does not permit the reproduction 
  of the whole or the remarkable speech delivered by him at that time, but it is 
  believed that many brethren will be delighted to read that part which contains 
  his stirring account of Masonic relief during the soul-racking days of the 
  Civil War.
   
   AS A 
  MASON, holding a not altogether obscure position in the Order, I have, in the 
  course of my life written and said much about its excellence and beauty.  I 
  know that it teaches fraternal love.  I know that it inculcates kindness to 
  the destitute, and sympathy for the sorrowing.  I know its pretensions to be a 
  science of morality and a development in one direction of the religious 
  sentiment.  But until this war came upon us, in all its horror of want and 
  suffering, of demoniac hate and inhuman passion, I did not know how 
  successfully theory and practice could be mingled in the teachings of the 
  Order and the actions of the disciples.  I did not know how surely and 
  steadfastly its rays of light could dispel the gloom of this dark night of our 
  national history.
   
  When 
  the first struggles of the infant rebellion began to threaten the gigantic 
  future of ruin and desolation, which it subsequently too successfully 
  achieved, all the other social, moral and religious societies of the country 
  preserved a deathlike silence.  No voice of warning, no voice of entreaty, no 
  prayer or suggestion for forbearance came from any section of the land, 
  already upheaving with the throes of a fratricidal conflict.  The Church where 
  peace on earth and good will toward men should have been at all times, but 
  then more especially, the constant theme, was dumb as the grave. The dark 
  funeral pall of war was closing around the land, and there was none to raise 
  its gathering clouds and let in one solitary ray of peace, or hope, or love.
   
  
  Masonry alone, mindful of its divine mission on earth, spoke out with 
  persuasive tongue of exhortation, that men and brethren should abstain from 
  this cruel conflict.  That it thus spoke is a noble incident of its history.  
  And although its voice was then unheeded, none shall henceforth, forever, rob 
  it of the glory of the attempt.
   
  
  Scarcely sixty days had elapsed after the first shot had been fired at Fort 
  Sumpter, when, from the National Capitol, the true-hearted Grand Master of the 
  Templars of the United States issued a memorable address to the knights of his 
  command, who were scattered over both sections of our discordant country, in 
  which he "implored each one, after humbly seeking strength and aid from on 
  High, to exert all means at his command to avert the dread calamity and 
  prevent the shedding of fraternal blood."
   
  Not a 
  month had passed ere the officers of the Grand Lodge of Tenessee made a 
  similar invocation for peace; and in the tones of entreaty that ought to have 
  been heard, "as Masons, as members of a common brotherhood, as brethren bound 
  together by fraternal ties not to be broken save by the hand of death," they 
  appealed for a cessation of the unnatural strife.
   
  And a 
  few weeks later, the Grand Masters of Kentucky, of Ohio, and of Indiana, 
  united in a similar work of attempted reconciliation; and crying out from the 
  very depths of their hearts, "Is there no balm for the bleeding wounds of our 
  nation? Is there no hand to hold out the olive branch? No saviour to still the 
  troubled waters?" - they concluded their earnest appeal by inviting a Masonic 
  convention, which should recommend some plan to heal the wounds of the 
  country.  Had the acerbity of political strife, and the cunning of political 
  corruption which were then overbearing the deluded people with their pressure, 
  permitted the holding of such a convention, who can tell what blessed results 
  might have been brought forth from the communion of men who had been taught 
  the duty of mutual kindness and mutual forbearance at the same sacred altar 
  and in the same mystic language?
   
  And 
  then came with like counsels the gentle voice of Cyril Pearl from his far-off 
  home on the very borders of our land.  He lived to see the culmination of the 
  war which he deprecated.  Before its decline he was called from his earthly 
  labours of love.  Masonry can illy spare such noble-hearted men.
   
  And 
  when at last the clouds of war had not only gathered all over the land, but 
  had burst forth in a storm of carnage; when there was no more hope of peace 
  until the discordant passions of men should be diluted with the flow of blood, 
  the Grand Master of South Carolina, whose heart, strongly beating with Union 
  sympathies, has long since been quelled in death, addressed an encyclical 
  letter to his brethren, in which he charged them in the name of our Supreme 
  and Universal Master, "to suffer not the disputes and broils of men to impair 
  the harmony which has existed and will exist throughout the fraternity." "Let 
  us not," he said, in his own emphatic language, "let us not hear among us that 
  there is war; that strife and dissension prevail.  As Masons, it concerns us 
  not."
   
  And I 
  rejoice in my heart that these teachings were not unheeded.  If there was war 
  without, there was always peace within our lodges.
   
  Will 
  you bear with me while I say of my native jurisdiction, where I think I have 
  some Masonic influence, that in South Carolina, reproached as I fear she 
  justly is, as birthplace, the benignant principles of Freemasonry were never 
  for a moment forgotten.  In its capital city, the only place, I fear, on the 
  whole continent where the same deed of love was enacted, prisoners of war, who 
  were Masons, were relieved on their parole by the officer of their guard, 
  himself a Mason, and carried from the prison to the lodge room, to relieve the 
  weariness of their captivity by witnessing and participating in the secret 
  services of the Order.
   
  And I 
  can solemnly aver that I never approached a Mason or lodge in Charleston, with 
  a petition for the relief of a destitute, suffering prisoner of war, without 
  receiving the kindest response and the most liberal donation.
   
  
  Throughout the length and breadth of our land, at the North and the South, the 
  East, and the West, wherever there was the sin of strife, there, too, was the 
  atoning peace of Masonry.  It went into the prison, and gave comfort to the 
  captive.  It went into the hospital, and gave balm to the wounded.  It went 
  into the battlefield, and gave rescue of life to the conquered.
   
  Let 
  none henceforth speak of its unknown mysteries, or contempt for its pretended 
  merits.  Let its adversaries be silent before the magnitude of its 
  achievements; and when the history of this unnatural war is written, while all 
  honour is bestowed upon the hero and the patriot, let it not be forgotten, but 
  let it rather be inscribed in characters of living light, that when war was 
  beginning to whet its beak - while other associations were indifferent and 
  dumb - while the churches themselves gave no sign of Christian life, Masonry 
  done sought to avert the impending evil; and when the full tide of conflict 
  had rolled in upon our shores, and blood was soaked into the ground, Masonry 
  again came forth, a ministering angel, to clothe in some measure the stain of 
  our nation's fratricidal contest with a ray of cheering light, and to give to 
  the black cloud of war a silver lining.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  A 
  ROMAN CATHOLIC EDITOR OPPOSES ROMAN CATHOLIC SECRET SOCIETIES
   
  
  Why Roman Catholics 
  should be so opposed to Freemasonry because it is a secret society while their 
  own church fosters, and has in times past fostered, some of the most powerful 
  secret societies that have ever existed has long been a standing puzzle to 
  Masons who believe that what is sauce for the goose should also be sauce for 
  the gander. But Masons are not the only ones to observe this curious 
  inconsistency. Here is a letter from a Roman Catholic editor that was 
  published in The Fortnightly Review, September 1st, 1922, page 327. It is 
  sufficiently explicit and stands in no need of interpretation. The Fortnightly 
  Review is a Roman Catholic journal, published on the 1st and 16th of every 
  month, 5851 Etzel Avenue, St. Louis, Mo. It is edited by Arthur Preuss, author 
  of a well known "book" on Freemasonry.
   
  
  "I just finished 
  reading your fine article 'Combating Secret Societies' (F.R., No. 16, p. 301 
  sq.). While reading it, and fully agreeing with Bishop Wehrle, I wondered what 
  should be said about the secret societies within the Church or 'in the shadow 
  of the Church.'
   
  
  "Thirty years ago, as a 
  printer, I became interested in secret societies, Every once in a while some 
  mysterious stuff came along 'a printers handled the cuts of various emblems, 
  turned out stationery, letters, etc., and began to study the material. This 
  will explain why I am able today to tell at first glance to what lodge a man 
  belongs if he wears an emblem. When I went into business for myself, I was 
  told of the many advantages of secret orders, and I joined one. My interest 
  grew, I became very active and was elected to various offices, excepting the 
  'paid' offices, but I have had my fill of 'honor.' Once I discussed the 
  question of life insurance and fraternal orders with a Lutheran pastor, whom I 
  respected for the stand he took against all the mummery, tomfoolery and rot. 
  This pastor was well read on the subject and gave me a ritual of a certain 
  secret society. Reading it I found that it was similar, yes, in some parts and 
  respects identical with the ritual which 'we' used. After that I read various 
  exposes, and I have reasons to believe that the latter are correct. Later I 
  read your book on Freemasonry. My interest grew, and I obtained some 'real 
  rituals.' I am in a position now to state that all secret societies are 
  fashioned alike. 'We' met in an I.O.O.F. Hall at one time for a monster 
  initiation, and let me assure you that it was not necessary to shift much 
  scenery to adapt the hall for our 'ceremonies.' 'We' even left the altar where 
  it stood, but called it the 'Center Pedestal.'
   
  
  " 'We' have the 
  'stations,' the 'wicket,' the 'pass-word,' the 'grip,' the sign and salute, 
  the 'gown and cap,' the 'mysteries,' all the awe-inspiring things and all the 
  tommyrot of the lodge room with a few religious features to make it a little 
  different.
   
  
  "Of course, 'we' go to 
  communion in a body to remain in good standing.
   
  
  "As long as 'we' act 
  thus and indulge in the mummery and humbug which is being condemned by our 
  bishops here and there, results cannot be expected. What we need, and need 
  badly, is a house-cleaning that begins right at home.
   
  
  "I am not writing this 
  for publication, and cannot permit my name to be printed in connection with 
  it. I am simply stating facts which cannot be overlooked, or disputed for that 
  matter. It has gone too far, and, I believe that it is beyond remedy. When it 
  is borne in mind that the Wisconsin Staatsverband (D.R.K.C.V.) recently filled 
  a long-felt want by adopting an 'Einfuhrungs-Modus' with a very strong leaning 
  to secrecy, it becomes plain that the garden is full of weeds.
   
  
  "Worst of all: If the 
  Church tolerates secret societies within and 'in her shadow,' Catholics 
  naturally must conclude that they are not so bad after all. Swimming against 
  the stream, as both of us do, we have the sensation of being living fish, but 
  it is folly to think that we are making any headway.
   
  
  "I could give you a 
  'lot of dope,' but what's the use? Constant dripping may hollow a stone, but 
  you and I will be dead and buried a long time before the stone will show any 
  marks." A Catholic Fellow Editor.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  GOTHIC 
  CATHEDRALS USED AS CIVIC BUILDINGS
   
  
  The Gothic cathedrals 
  were almost as much civic buildings as they were churches, and in the sense 
  that they embodied the pride, the ambition, and the rivalries of the cities, 
  this was eminently the case. But they were also actually used for town 
  meetings, for public festivals, and for theatrical exhibitions - the "miracle 
  plays" and "passion plays," which have survived in one famous instance at 
  Oberammergau. In the Middle Ages the church and the cathedral were always 
  open, like the Roman Catholic churches of our own day. Here the poor man was 
  the equal of the rich. The beggar and his lord met on terms of equality in the 
  liberty of using the building and in the theory of its religious teachings. 
  There were no pews for favored owners. The cathedral was the palace of the 
  poor, and its entire space outside the sanctuary was open to their daily 
  visits and sojourn at will, without disturbance.
   
  
  The cathedral was the 
  museum of art; a museum made, not to display the ostentation of the rich or 
  the luxury of his life, but to teach by pictures and reliefs the history of 
  the world as then known and comprehended by the traditions of the church, and 
  the lessons of faith and of sacrifice. Here were, moreover, the actual 
  memorials and relics of past ages; for here was the treasury not only of the 
  art of the present but also of the art of the past. Finally, the cathedral was 
  the sanctuary of the famous and illustrious dead. Their tombs were its 
  decoration and its pride.
   
  - W.H. 
  Goodyear.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  
  MEMORIALS TO GREAT MEN WHO WERE MASONS - GENERAL JOSEPH WARREN
   
  BY 
  BRO. GEO. W. BAIRD, P.G.M., DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
   
  
  JOSEPH WARREN was Grand 
  Master of Massachusetts. There is a handsome memorial to him in Roxbury of 
  that state, where he was buried.
   
  
  General Warren was born 
  in Roxbury in 1741, and he was killed at the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775. 
  Like so many of our early patriots he was a physician before he became a 
  soldier. He was graduated from Harvard University and practiced medicine in 
  Boston.
   
  
  His courageous and 
  fiery patriotism is revealed by the fact that when Mr. Samuel Adams declined 
  to deliver the address on the second anniversary of the "Boston Massacre," 
  March 5, 1772, Dr. Warren himself delivered it, though he knew the act was 
  fraught with great danger to himself.
   
  
  Dr. Warren was a 
  delegate to the convention at Suffolk, which took measures to prevent Governor 
  Gage from fortifying the south entrance to Boston. He was a delegate to the 
  Massachusetts Congress in 1774, and was elected president of that body. It is 
  said that "to his energy was in great measure due the successful result of the 
  battle of Lexington." In 1775 he received his commission as Major General and 
  took part shortly afterwards in the Battle of Bunker Hill, with which his name 
  will ever be connected in the loving annals of this nation.
   
  
  There is a story told 
  of him to the effect that he was warned by Elbridge Gerry against hazard in 
  exposing his person, to which General Warren exclaimed: "I know that I may 
  fall, but where is the man who does not think it glorious and delightful to 
  die for his country !" Another story relates that a British officer called to 
  him by name to warn him of his risks and even ordered his men to cease firing. 
  Dr. Warren was shot in the head and died instantly. If it be true that the 
  British officer did call to him in this manner we should feel remiss were we 
  to pass so gallant an act without praise.
   
  
  General Warren devoted 
  years to the Craft and occupies a conspicuous place in the history of the 
  early Masonry of the United States. He was a Mason in deed as well as in word, 
  and such men always become the idol of the brethren. Lodges have been named 
  for General Warren in almost every state in the Union. The Grand Secretary of 
  New York, Brother Kenworthy, has made the excellent suggestion that the Craft 
  establish the custom of naming new lodges after these great patriots.
   
  
  Perhaps I can do no 
  more thorough justice to the story of the Masonic career of General Warren 
  than by incorporating here an account of him published in the Grand Lodge 
  Proceedings of Massachusetts, June 14, 1916, wherein we may read:
   
  
  "Joseph Warren was born 
  in Roxbury, Mass., June 11, 1741. He graduated at Harvard College in 1759. 
  During 1760 he was employed as a teacher in a public school in Roxbury and in 
  the following year commenced the study of medicine under Doctor Lloyd, an 
  eminent physician of that day. He began practice in 1763 and is said to have 
  distinguished himself at once. In 1764 the smallpox prevailed extensively in 
  Boston and he was very successful in treating it. About this time he began to 
  take an active part in political affairs, and his letters to public men and 
  his newspaper essays soon attracted the attention even of the government. They 
  were remarkable for clearness of thought, terseness of statement, and cogency 
  of argument. In 1774 he was chosen to represent the town of Boston in the 
  Provincial Congress and in the following year was elected President of that 
  body. Here he manifested extraordinary powers of mind and a peculiar fitness 
  for the guidance and government of men in times of difficulty and danger.
   
  
  "The Congress was then 
  sitting at Watertown and upon its daily adjournment he hastened to the 
  military camp there to participate with the common soldiers in the exercise 
  and drills and to encourage and animate them by exhortation and example. The 
  Provincial Congress offered him the appointment of Surgeon General, but he 
  declined it and accepted a Commission as Major General, dated only three days 
  before the Battle of Bunker Hill.
   
  
  "On the night of the 
  16th of June, 1775, he presided at the meeting of the Colonial Congress which 
  continued in session a great part of the night in Watertown. Early in the 
  morning of June 17th he visited a patient in Dedham and left her saying that 
  he must go to Charlestown to get a shot at the British and would return to her 
  in season for her confinement which was almost hourly expected. He arrived at 
  Bunker Hill only a few moments before the first attack of the British troops. 
  There he refused to take command when offered it by Putnam and Prescott, 
  seized a musket, and fought as a private. His reluctance to obey the order to 
  retreat resulted in his death as he was only a few rods from the redoubt when 
  the British obtained full possession and he; was instantly killed by a bullet 
  in the head. He was buried in a shallow grave on the field.
   
  
  "Immediately after the 
  evacuation of Boston his Masonic brethren determined to go in search of the 
  body. They repaired to the spot indicated by an eye-witness of his death. It 
  was at the brow of a hill, and near the head of the grave was an acacia tree. 
  Upon the removal of the earth which appeared to have been recently disturbed 
  they found the body of their Grand Master. This was on the 6th of April, 1776. 
  They carefully conveyed the body to the State House in Boston, and on the 8th 
  of the same month an oration was delivered over his remains by Perez Morton 
  who was at the time Grand Marshal of the Grand Lodge. After the funeral 
  ceremonies the remains were deposited in a tomb in the Granary Burying Ground 
  where they remained for nearly fifty years. In 1825 his remains were found, 
  identified, deposited in a box of hardwood, designated by a silver plate, and 
  placed in the Warren Tomb under St. Paul's Church, Boston. A number of years 
  later they were again removed and found their final resting place in Forest 
  Hills Cemetery.
   
  
  "King Solomon's Lodge 
  (then of Charlestown, now of Somerville), in December, 1794, erected and 
  dedicated a monument to his memory in the shape of a Tuscan pillar eighteen 
  feet high, resting upon a platform eight feet in height, eight feet square, 
  and fenced about to Protect it from injury. On the top of the pillar was 
  placed a gilt urn with the initials and age of General Warren enclosed within 
  the square and compasses. The dedicatory services and procession were 
  elaborate. The lodge kept the monument in repair until March 8, 1825, when 
  they voted to present the land and monument to the Bunker Hill Monument 
  Association upon condition that there should be placed within the walls of the 
  monument the Association was about to erect a suitable memorial of the ancient 
  pillar in order to perpetuate that early patriotic act of the Masonic 
  Fraternity. In fulfillment of that condition King Solomon's Lodge on June 24, 
  1845, placed within Bunker Hill Monument an exact model in marble of the 
  original monument. The public ceremonies were conducted by the Grand Lodge, 
  including many distinguished brethren from other jurisdictions. An interesting 
  feature of the occasion was the presentation of the working tools to the Grand 
  Master, Augustus Peabody, by Past Grand Mast John Soley, who had himself fifty 
  years before dedicated the first monument. The corner stone of the present 
  monument was laid with Mason ceremonies on the fiftieth anniversary of the 
  battle under the direction of Grand Master John Abbot, assisted by our 
  illustrious Brother Lafayette. The completion of the monument was celebrated 
  on the seventeenth of June, 1843, the Masonic portion of the procession being 
  under the direction of King Solomon's Lodge. 
  
   
  
  "On that occasion Past 
  Grand Master Benjamin Russell, a soldier of the Revolution, wore the Masonic 
  Apron of General Warren. On June 17, 1857, Most Worshipful John T. Heard, 
  Grand Master, assisted by the Grand Officers and two thousand brethren, 
  inaugurated a statue of General Warren in the presence of about five thousand 
  persons. 
  
   
  
  "Joseph Warren was initated 
  in St. Andrew's Lodge of Boston on September 30, 1761. He was passed on 
  November 2d, but there is no record as to the date of his raising. On November 
  14, 1765, the lodge voted unanimously that Doctor Joseph Warren be re-admitted 
  a member of the lodge. He was elected Master in 1769. In December of that year 
  he received from the Earl of Dalhousie, Grand Master of Masons in Scotland, a 
  Commission bearing date May 30, 1769, appointing him Grand Master of Masons in 
  Boston and within one hundred miles of the same. In 1773 he received another 
  Commission dated March 3, 1772, issued by the Earl of Dumfries, then Grand 
  Master of Scotland, extending his jurisdiction over the Continent of America. 
  He was installed under each of these Commissions on the 27th
   
  
  =====================================================
   
  BUNKER 
  HILL MONUMENT
  
  ORIGINAL INSCRIPTION
  
  "Erected A. D. MDCCXCIV., by King Solomon's Lodge of Freemasons, constituted 
  at Charlestown, 1783, in memory of Major General Joseph Warren and his 
  Associates, who were slain on this memorable spot, June 17, 1775.
   
  
  None but they who set 
  a just value upon the blessings of Liberty are worthy to enjoy her. In vain we 
  toiled: in vain we fought: we bled in vain, if you, our offspring, want valor 
  to repel the assaults of her invaders!”
   
  
  Charlestown Settled 
  1628: Burnt 1775; Rebuilt 1776. The closed land given by Hon. James Russell."
   
  NEW 
  INSCRIPTION
   
  "This 
  is an exact model of the first monument erected on
  Bunker Hill, which, with the land on 
  which it stood, was given A.D. 1825 by King Solomon's Lodge, of this town, to 
  the Bunker Hill Monument Association, that they might erect upon its site a 
  more imposing structure. The Association, in fulfilment of a pledge at that 
  time given, have allowed, in their imperishable obelisk, this model to be 
  inserted, with appropriate ceremonies, by King Solomon's Lodge, June 24th, A. 
  D. 1845."
   
  
  ====================================================
  
   
  
  of December of the 
  respective years. Grand Master Warren presided over all the forty meetings of 
  the Grand Lodge held previous to his death, save four. On one of the occasions 
  when he was absent, namely, June 3, 1774, the record recites that the Grand 
  Lodge adjourned by reason of the few Grand Officers present, they being 
  engaged on consequential public business. He was present, however, at the 
  adjourned meeting on the 7th of that month.
   
  
  "Joseph Warren, the 
  first man of distinction to lay down his life in the cause of American 
  liberty, was not only young and handsome, but also able, energetic, patriotic, 
  active and brave. Notwithstanding his youth he had the responsibilities and 
  care of a young family, the anxieties and labors of the large practice of a 
  popular physician, and the demands of an extensive correspondence both at home 
  and abroad, personal as well as political. With all this he was a constant 
  attendant upon the meetings of the Committee of Correspondence, the Committee 
  of Safety, the meetings of the town, of the Sons of Liberty, and other 
  caucuses. He was a prolific writer. He was assiduous in the exercise of his 
  Masonic duties to such an extent that Masonry even in those troublous days 
  flourished and prospered under his administration."
   
  
  When Daniel Webster 
  delivered his masterly address at the dedication of Bunker Hill monument, he 
  made no mention of the monument it displaced, which seems to have been largely 
  forgotten. I am indebted to Brother C.F. Willard of San Diego, California, for 
  the reference, and to the Grand Secretary of Massachusetts (Brother Frederick 
  W. Hamilton) for the picture herewith produced. It tells the whole story, and 
  any attempt to add to its grandeur would be like an effort to paint the lily. 
  But how so great and important an illustration could be buried so long it is 
  hard to understand. The name of King Solomon's Lodge should be emblazoned in 
  letters of gold for this grand act; and, be it remembered, that it must have 
  been erected at no small sacrifice in that day when money was so scarce.
   
  
  This Masonic monument 
  was removed to make place for a larger one, at public expense, thus removing 
  this evidence that the great Warren was a Mason, though his memorial at 
  Roxbury shows that he was.
   
  
  I conclude with a poem 
  that gives excellent expression to the spirit of Warren. My copy is signed by 
  the name "Pierpont": can some reader tell us something about this 
  Revolutionary bard? was he the John Pierpont who was born in 1785 and died in 
  1866, and who divided his attention equally between themes patriotic and 
  religious ?
   
  
  WARREN'S ADDRESS AT BUNKER HILL
   
  
  Stand! the ground's 
  your own, my braves!
  
  Will ye give it up to 
  slaves? 
  
  Will ye look for 
  greener graves?
  
  Hope ye mercy still?
  
  
  What's the mercy 
  despots feel?
  
  Hear it in that battle 
  peal!
  
  Hear it on yon 
  bristling steel!
  
  Ask it - ye who will.
   
  Fear 
  ye foes who kill for hire?
  Will 
  ye to your homes retire?
  Look 
  behind you! they're afire!
  And, 
  before you, see - 
  Who 
  have done it! - from the vale
  On 
  they come! - and will ye quail? - 
  Leaden 
  rain and iron hail
  Let 
  their welcome be!
   
  In the 
  God of battles trust!
  Die we 
  may, - and die we must; -
  But, 
  oh! where can dust to dust
  Be 
  consigned so well,
  As 
  where heaven its dews shall shed
  On the 
  martyred patriot's bed,
  And 
  the rocks shall raise their head,
  Of his 
  deeds to tell!
   
  
  ----o----
   
  THE 
  AWFUL FETISH OF FEEDING
   
  
  Miscellanea Latomorum, 
  Vol. VII, No. 3, page 47, prints a communication that is not without point on 
  this side of the water. Says the editor, Brother Lionel Vibert: "I advisedly 
  print the following outpourings without ally indications of their origin, but 
  I can assure my readers that they come from an eminent source." The item is as 
  follows:
   
  
  "I was very pleased to 
  see your remarks on page 135 of volume VI. Royal Cumberland is very much to be 
  congratulated that this is the class of lodge that it is a pleasure to belong 
  to. This awful fetish of feeding that now exists is depressing. On the last 
  two occasions I have been to Chapters (Royal Arch, not in London) my whole 
  evening was spoilt by hustling the ceremony to get to dinner. In one case I 
  was in the second chair and a Provincial Grand Lodge Officer sitting behind 
  who was paying an official visit asked me to get the Z to cut out the lectures 
  and then to take the ballot for the officers in one lot. The other occasion 
  was an installation - only two of the principals were fully installed as the 
  third was already an H. A ceremony of exaltation was to follow but it was 
  actually cut out because they were afraid the soup would be cold! These two 
  Chapters were in different Provinces, but such cases are by no means uncommon. 
  Masonry of this sort is useless. The last time I was in a Mark lodge almost 
  the same sort of thing was done, the Master made very neat little addresses to 
  his new officers, and afterwards a visiting Provincial Grand Lodge Officer 
  groused about it because it made us late for dinner. This sort of thing is a 
  very bad example to the younger brethren.
   
  
  "There is another 
  habit which very much wants stopping, and that is making a Masonic sign when 
  toasting a brother across the table; it seems to be getting much more common 
  than it was and is dangerous when there are so mary outside waiters about."
   
  
  ----o----
   
  TO 
  ALBERT G. MACKEY
   
  BY 
  BRO. H.L. HAYWOOD, IOWA
   
  
  Scholar Mason, gentle, kindly,
  How 
  securely has thy name,
  How 
  serenely has thy fame
  Braved 
  the years that else so blindly
  Have 
  undone so much we prize!
  Still 
  thy spirit hovers near us,
  Now to 
  guide and now to cheer us,
  Never 
  harsh and always wise.
  In 
  what Lodge, beyond our ken
  Hast 
  thou found a Master's place?
  Dost 
  thou now behold the Face 
  Of the 
  Master of all men? 
  May He 
  grant to thee the wage 
  Of a 
  Craftsman and a Sage.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  THE 
  TEACHINGS OF MASONRY
   
  BY 
  BRO.  H.L. HAYWOOD
   
  
  The following paper is 
  one of a series of articles on "Philosophical Masonry," or "The Teachings of 
  Masonry," by Brother Haywood, to be used for reading and discussion in lodges 
  and study clubs. From the questions following each section of the paper the 
  study club leader should select such as he may desire to use in bringing out 
  particular points for discussion. To go into a lengthy discussion on each 
  individual question presented might possibly consume more time than the lodge 
  or study club may be able to devote to the study club meeting.
   
  
  In conducting the study 
  club meetings the leader should endeavor to hold the discussions closely to 
  the text of the paper and not permit the members to speak too long at one time 
  or to stray onto another subject. Whenever it becomes evident that the 
  discussion is turning from the original subject the leader should request the 
  members to make notes of the particular points or phases of the matter they 
  may wish to discuss or inquire into and bring them up after the last section 
  of the paper is disposed of.
   
  
  The meetings should be 
  closed with a "Question Box" period, when such questions as may have come up 
  during the meeting and laid over until this time should be entered into and 
  discussed. Should any questions arise that cannot be answered by the study 
  club leader or some other brother present, these questions may be submitted to 
  us and we will endeavor to answer them for you in time for your next meeting.
   
  
  Supplemental references 
  on the subjects treated in this paper will be found at the end of the article.
   
  PART 
  XVI - ENDLESS LIFE
   
  "Tis 
  true; 'tis certain; man though dead retains
  Part 
  of himself; the immortal mind remains."
   
  THESE 
  WORDS, written by Homer 3,000 years ago, remind us how that ages before the 
  ferment of modem thought and all the crusades of our modern religions, men 
  believed in immortality as we do now.  If one were to push himself behind 
  Homer into an age long anterior to his, and as ancient to him as his is to us, 
  one would and men cherishing the same hope.  Imhotep, the father of 
  architecture in stone, builder to the Egyptian King Zoser, lived 5,000 years 
  ago, but for all that he believed in immortality as did Homer.  And so with 
  those to whom Imhotep looked back as to those grown ancient to him; and also 
  with them in their turn; and so on to the beginning of things when the first 
  half-wild hunter paused long enough in his search of meat to gaze wistfully 
  across lovely valleys, where floating gossamers reminded him how frail and how 
  fleeting is human life.
   
  It is 
  useless to try to prove by logic or by demonstration the immortality of man.  
  We believe it, there is an end of it! And we do not believe it because we have 
  proved it, but we try to prove it because we already believe it.  It is a 
  hope, a kind of inward certainty which finds its support not in this fact or 
  in that, but in the cast and colour of life as a whole.  It rises up into our 
  minds like an exaltation from all our thoughts, all our experiences, all our 
  dreams, as the odour that drifts across a summer field distills from 
  numberless unnoted plants.  We are never so puzzled as when we are challenged 
  to give a reasoned proof of this hope: and we are never so unreasonable as 
  when we cease to believe it.  Men everywhere and always have believed it not 
  because priests have taught them or because scientists have found out the 
  secret of it, but because life itself has taught them, and it is something 
  that the universe itself is always whispering to them.  The priests and the 
  churches have not created the belief: it is the belief that has made the 
  priests and churches, and no amount of ignorance, baseness, or superstition 
  appears able to blot out that great hope.  The cannibals cling to it, and we 
  ourselves though we sleep in a gutter, hear it announced within that 
  whispering gallery which we call the soul.
   
  
  "Though inland far we be,
  Our 
  souls have sight of that immortal sea
  Which 
  brought us hither."
   
  How 
  long have men believed in immortality? Who was Homer? Imhotep? Why do you 
  believe in immortality? How would you set about to prove it? How do we know 
  that men have always believed it?
   
   
  It is 
  impossible to form any mental picture of the future life.  No two religions 
  describe it in the same way, and some of them, ancient Buddhism, for example, 
  have refused to describe it at all.  Our modern spiritists who follow in the 
  train of Sir Oliver Lodge, Conan Doyle, Camile Flammarion and their school, 
  believe themselves to have received authentic news from the Beyond but 
  unfortunately they have never been able to agree as to the nature of things in 
  that unknown realm.  It appears that such descriptions as are given through 
  the mediums, ouija boards and such other occult means of communication usually 
  conform in a general way to the preconceptions of the spiritists themselves.  
  The Eskimo spiritist is told that heaven is a beautiful place full of icebergs 
  and polar bears; the American Indian learns that it is a happy hunting ground; 
  the Chinese spiritist - spiritism has been developed in China to a degree of 
  respectability and perfection never attained elsewhere - is informed that 
  heaven is a gloried China organized strictly in accord with the principles of 
  ancestor worship.  All this would indicate that if bona fide communications 
  ever do penetrate the veil the conditions are such as to preclude the 
  transmission of accurate or definite information, so that spiritists 
  themselves are in like case with the rest of us who find that eye hath not 
  seen nor ear heard nor hath it entered into the mind of man to conceive what 
  the future life is like.
   
  
  Nevertheless it is difficult to cherish even the thinnest hope of a continued 
  life without trying to fashion some sort of conception of it, because the mind 
  cannot otherwise handle the idea at all.  Because we hold immortality as a 
  belief we are compelled to think it as a thought, and it is this psychological 
  necessity, perhaps, that has led men in every country and in all ages to make 
  for themselves some picture of heaven.  One should not try to quarrel with 
  this, because one cannot do so successfully: man is so made that he must 
  behave in this manner, and that is an end of it.
   
  But it 
  is for this reason, I believe, that we should be all the more careful that our 
  thinking about the future life be strictly reasonable.  If our nature compels 
  us to think out some conception of immortality, that same nature similarly 
  compels us to fashion a conception that won't insult the intelligence or fly 
  in the face of known facts. It is necessary to be reasonable while we reason 
  about Eternal Life. It seems to me - and I speak here only for myself - that 
  this principle in itself is one of the teachings of Freemasonry concerning 
  this subject.  Our Fraternity leaves it to each individual to fashion his own 
  conceptions of the Beyond but at the same time, and by all the arts at its 
  command, persuades its votaries ever to remain in the Light, to seek more 
  Light, and to fear to walk farther than the Light can lead them: and this 
  Light itself is, of course, nothing other than reason, and knowledge, and 
  right thinking.  When the subject passes beyond into the darkness of the 
  unknowable it is better to cease pursuing it further, lest we fall into 
  superstition.  It is better to remain agnostic about what the future life is 
  like than to hold fast to unreason.
   
  How do 
  you picture the future life in your own mind? What is spiritism? Name a few 
  leading spiritists now living.  Do spiritists agree among themselves as to the 
  future life? Give an example of some conception of the future life that is 
  contradicted by facts as we know them, and that is unreasonable.  Why should 
  we try to make our picture of the future life as reasonable as possible?
   
   
  It is 
  both safe and wise to hold fast to the principle that all reality is bound up 
  together into a great unity - for the which reason we call it a Universe - and 
  that one part of this system does not contradict or give the lie to any other 
  part.  There is no good reason to suppose that death makes any profound change 
  in the scheme of things.  Death is a part of the Universe and always has been 
  and, it may possibly prove, always will be. It is reasonable to suppose that 
  the Universe will be the same after we are dead as it was before, and that 
  therefore the "future life," as we call it (it is no longer "future" to those 
  now living it) will in all essentials be of a piece with this present life.  
  Why should we expect marvels, wonders, and impossibilities there when such 
  things are not found here? What right have we to suppose that the experience 
  of death will change our world out of all recognition, and transform ourselves 
  into beings utterly different from what we are?
   
  "What 
  is human is immortal," said Bulwer-Lytton. Why is not the reverse also true? 
  "What is immortal is human." We are here in closest relation to an earth, out 
  of the surface of which we labour to wrest our bread each and every one of us 
  is the member of one race - the human - and of some one grand division 
  thereof, in consequence of which we differ greatly in colour, language, 
  appearance, and a hundred other things.  The race as a whole is equally 
  divided between two sexes, the members of which are so unlike each other in 
  many important respects as to cause one to believe that sexual differences 
  extend into the inmost recesses of human nature, and are not to be put on or 
  off by any possible change. We are each one organized in a physical body, and 
  it is ceaselessly necessary for us to work, to strive, to endure, to eat and 
  sleep, and to suffer.  It may be that all these things will be carried over 
  into whatever life, or lives, may be waiting for us beyond.  They are neither 
  superficial nor accidental and are so woven into the general scheme of things 
  that it is difficult to understand how human life could know itself after 
  death with all such things omitted.
   
  In 
  spite of one's self such a discussion leads into theology, the most irritating 
  of all subjects, and the least appropriate to these pages.  In a field where 
  no landmarks are marked out for us we are necessarily forced to fall back on 
  private opinion, a thing I have done throughout this paper, and with the most 
  cordial invitation to the reader to disagree if he is so disposed.  I have no 
  interest as a Mason in theological beliefs concerning the future life save to 
  secure for ourselves a principle that will guarantee for us the full 
  protection of the present life and all its values.  It may be said that what a 
  man believes about the future is his own private affair and should be 
  respected as such.  This is very true as long as the man's beliefs about the 
  life to come do not seriously interfere with the life that now is, a thing 
  that often happens.  If my beliefs cause me to be illiberal or harsh, or 
  unkind, or if they are such as to destroy my happiness, then my beliefs become 
  matters of concern to my fellows, and they have a right to challenge me 
  thereon.  It is true, as I remarked above, that Freemasonry leaves the 
  fashioning of this religious belief to the individual, nevertheless the 
  Fraternity's spirit and teachings are distinctly opposed to beliefs that lead 
  a man into unbrotherly behaviour or unmasonic conduct.  What Masonry has to 
  teach concerning immortality is necessarily of a piece with its other 
  teachings.  If democracy, equality, charity, brotherly love, truth, 
  kindliness, and honourable labour are good things now they cannot cease to be 
  good things in the life to come.  If such things are of God in this life it is 
  hardly possible that they will cease to be divine in the next life.
   
  If a 
  man were to ask me point-blank, "what, in so many words, does Freemasonry 
  teach about the endless life?" I should be hard put to make a reply 
  "Freemasonry does not teach anything about it after the manner of an 
  old-fashioned church catechism, but all its rites and ceremonies, its spirit 
  and its laws are filled with immortality as the sky is suffused with light.  
  Immortality is the motif of the Masonic symphony.
   
  There 
  is one word to be said in addition. ln the great drama of the Third Degree 
  there are things done and said that give one a new and enlarged conception of 
  everlasting life.  The initiate has it brought home to him that if there are 
  some things which abide for ever, so that they are undestroyed by all the 
  deaths that are, it is possible to search out such things now, and to mould 
  his life about them, and give them the place of control at the center of the 
  heart, so that one can live the eternal life in the midst of time.  This is 
  not easily gained, as many a man has learned to his cost: there are ruffians 
  at the gates, lions in the path, and often it will seem to one who seeks this 
  Royal Secret that his days are become a succession of deaths.
   
  "He 
  who flagged not in the earthly strife,
  From 
  strength to strength advancing - only he
  His 
  soul well-knit, and all his battles won,
  
  Mounts, and that hardly, to eternal life."
   
  What 
  do we mean by saying that we live in a universe? What is your theory about the 
  part death plays in the life of man? What are the things in human nature least 
  liable to change after death? What is meant by theology? What kind of beliefs 
  about the future life cause men to be harsh and unkind? What has Masonry to 
  teach concerning immortality? What is the meaning of the drama of the Third 
  Degree? In what way does the Third Degree teach eternal life?
   
  
  SUPPLEMENTAL REFERENCES
   
  THE 
  BUILDER:
   
  Vol. I 
  (1915) - Immortality - The Circle, p. 133; After Death Shall We Live
  Again? 
  P. 300; Realization of the Truth, p. 211.
   
  Vol. 
  II (1916) - Reflections on the Philosophy of Albert Pike, p. 9; The Spirit
  of 
  Man, P. 187; The Three Grips, P. 30; The Third Degree, p. 126;
  
  Toleration, p. 265.
   
  Vol. 
  III (1917) - The Landmarks, p. 211; The Feet of Time, p.25; Life After
  Death, 
  p. 123.
   
  Vol.  
  IV (1918) - Where the Rainbow Never Fades, p. 162; The Ancient
  
  Mysteries p. 223; Symbolism of the Three Degrees, p. 291.
   
  Vol. V 
  (1919) - Studies in Blue Lodge Symbolism, p. 136; Eleusinian
  
  Mysteries, p 240; The Plan of Freemasonry p. 266; Immortality, p. 145.
   
  Vol. 
  VI (1920) - Psychical Research, p. 918; Eternal Life, October C.C.B. p.
  3; 
  Freemasonry Among the American Indians, p. 295.
   
  Vol. 
  VII (1921) - The Immortality of the Soul, p. 50.
   
  Vol. 
  VIII (1922) - Death, the Liberator, p. 11; The Future Life, p. 126.
   
  
  Mackey's Encyclopedia-(Revised Edition):
   
  
  Buddhism, p. 122.  See also related topics under Aranyaka, p. 74; Aryan,
  p. 80; 
  Mahabharata, Mahadeva, Mahakasyapa, p. 460; Pitaka, p. 569;
  
  Puranas, p. 601, Ramayana, p. 607; Sakti, p. 661, Sastra and Sat B'hai, p.
  664; 
  Shaster, p. 685; Shesha, p. 686; Sruti, p. 710; Upadevas, Upanishad,
  p. 
  818; Vedanga, Vedas, p. 824; Zenana, Zennaar, p. 878.
   
  
  Egyptian Hieroglyphs, p. 231; Egyptian Mysteries, pp. 232-234; Immortality
  of the 
  Soul, p. 347; Master Mason or Third Degree, p. 474; Religion of
  
  Masonry, pp. 617-619; Speculative Masonry, p. 704; Spiritualizing, p. 706;
  
  Spiritual Lodge, p. 706; Sublime, p. 732.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  OUR 
  STUDY CLUB PLAN
   
  
  Our Masonic Study Club 
  Course, of which the foregoing paper by Brother Haywood is a part, was begun 
  in THE BUILDER early in 1917. Previous to the beginning of the present series 
  on "Philosophical Masonry," or "The Teachings of Masonry," as we have titled 
  it, were published some forty-three papers covering in detail "Ceremonial 
  Masonry" and "Symbolical Masonry" under the following several divisions: "The 
  Work of a Lodge," "The Lodge and the Candidate," "First Steps," "Second 
  Steps," and "Third Steps." A complete set of these papers up to January 1st, 
  1922, are obtainable in the bound volumes of THE BUILDER for 1917, 1918, 1919, 
  1920 and 1921.
   
  
  Following is an outline 
  of the subjects covered by the current series of study club papers by Brother 
  Haywood:
   
  THE 
  TEACHINGS OF MASONRY
   
  1. - 
  General Introduction.
   
  2. - 
  The Masonic Conception of Human Nature.
   
  3. - 
  The Idea of Truth in Freemasonry.
   
  4. - 
  The Masonic Conception of Education.
   
  5. - 
  Ritualism and Symbolism.
   
  6. - 
  Initiation and Secrecy.
   
  7. - 
  Masonic Ethics.
   
  8. - 
  Equality.
   
  9. - 
  Liberty.
   
  
  10. - Democracy.
   
  
  11. - Masonry and 
  Industry.
   
  
  12. - The Brotherhood 
  of Man.
   
  
  13. - Freemasonry and 
  Religion.
   
  14. - 
  Universality
  
   
  
  15. - The Fatherhood of 
  God.
   
  
  16. - Endless Life.
   
  
  17. - Brotherly Aid.
   
  
  18. - Schools of 
  Masonic Philosophy.
   
  
  This systematic course 
  of Masonic study 
  has been taken up and carried out in monthly and semi-monthly meetings of 
  lodges and study clubs all over the United States and Canada, and in several 
  instances in lodges overseas.
   
  
  The course of study has 
  for its foundation two sources of Masonic information, THE BUILDER and 
  Mackey's Encyclopedia.
   
  HOW TO 
  ORGANIZE AND CONDUCT STUDY CLUB MEETINGS
   
  
  Study clubs may be 
  organized separate from the lodge, or as a part of the work of the lodge. In 
  the latter case the lodge should select a committee, preferably of three 
  "live" members who shall have charge of the study club meetings. The study 
  club meetings should be held at least once a month (excepting during July and 
  August, when the study club papers are discontinued in THE BUILDER), either at 
  a special communication of the lodge called for the purpose, or at a regular 
  communication at which no business (except the lodge routine) should be 
  transacted,all possible time to be devoted to study club purposes.
   
  
  After the lodge has 
  been opened and all routine business disposed of, the Master should turn the 
  lodge over to the chairman of the study club committee. The committee should 
  be fully prepared in advance on the subject to be discussed at the meeting. 
  All members to whom references for supplemental papers have been assigned 
  should be prepared with their material, and should also have a comprehensive 
  grasp of Brother Haywood's paper by a previous reading and study of it.
   
  
  PROGRAM FOR STUDY CLUB MEETINGS
   
  
  1. Reading of any 
  supplemental papers on the subject for the evening which may have been 
  prepared by brethren assigned such duties by the chairman of the study club 
  committee.
   
  
  2. Reading of the first 
  section of Brother Haywood's paper.
   
  
  3. Discussion of this 
  section, using the questions following this section to bring out points for 
  discussion.
   
  
  4. The subsequent 
  sections of the paper should then be taken up and disposed of in the same 
  manner.
   
  
  5. Question Box. Invite 
  questions on any subject in Masonry, from any and all brethren present. Let 
  the brethren understand that these meetings are for their particular benefit 
  and enlightenment and get them into the habit of asking all the questions they 
  may be able to think of. If at the time these questions are propounded no one 
  can answer them, send them in to us and we will endeavor to supply answers to 
  them in time for your next study club meetmg.
   
  
  FURTHER INFORMATION
   
  
  The foregoing 
  information should enable study club committees to conduct their meetings 
  without difficulty. However, if we can be of assistance to such committees, or 
  any individual member of lodges and study clubs at any time such brethren are 
  invited to feel 
  free to 
  communicate with us.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  
  EDITORIAL
   
  THE 
  BLUE LODGE HAS FIRST LIEN ON A MASON
   
  
  ONCE A MAN has begun to 
  take an active part in the activities of the Higher Degrees (as they have come 
  to be called) it is natural for him to become engrossed in them at the expense 
  of his Blue Lodge duties, and that because those degrees offer so much greater 
  variety. Instead of three degrees these other bodies, along with their 
  auxiliaries, offer a half hundred or so, and instead of one group of men there 
  are several, all of which makes for sustained interest as against the 
  comparative monotony of Blue Lodge work.
   
  
  The many brethren who 
  succumb to this appeal are not to be too roughly scolded because they but 
  follow the lead of nature. Nevertheless, and even so, they should all stop, 
  look, and listen. Not one "higher" grade can ever rise above the level of the 
  Craft lodge, which is fons et origina for the whole Masonic system. As the 
  Blue Lodge goes so goes Masonry. If the Blue Lodge sinks into control by the 
  least competent groups how much better off will the other bodies be in the 
  course of time? The whole York Rite and Scottish Rite systems are so utterly 
  dependent on the health and strength of Craft Masonry that no man can be a 
  friend to them who is not loyal to his Blue Lodge, so that the more zealous a 
  man is for the prosperity of any of the additional grades the more active 
  should he be in the work of the three degrees. The Blue Lodge has in the 
  nature of things first lien on a Mason's activities.
   
  
  It is of interest in 
  this connection to read a word written in the field and with no thought of a 
  literary public. In a report to his Grand Master, Brother H.E. Austin, a 
  Deputy District Grand Master of North Carolina, gave expression to some 
  sterling good sense:
   
  
  "Our Masons who have 
  the capacity, the initiative, the personality, are not attending the Blue 
  Lodge. They are not occupying the stations, they are not exercising leadership 
  in that branch of Masonry that is fundamental and where good leadership is so 
  essential. Our new members are not brought into contact with that type of 
  Mason who can give them the vision of a true conception of what Masonry is. 
  They are not receiving the inspiration, not getting the social contacts that 
  they expect and have a right to expect.
   
  
  "Our stronger Masons 
  must come to a realizing sense that they are doing Masonry a real harm and 
  putting Masonry into jeopardy, when they segregate themselves to the 
  Commandery, the Chapter, the Scottish Rite, etc., leaving the novice and the 
  poorly qualified to conduct the affairs of the local Blue Lodge.
   
  
  "I don't believe the 
  members of the higher orders have realized this situation."
   
  * * *
   
  THE 
  DOORS WIDE OPEN
   
  
  One of our best admired 
  contemporaries, a Masonic monthly edited with discretion and printed with 
  taste, carries on its cover a symbolic representation of the doors that lead 
  into the Masonic Temple. Significantly enough, these portals, which swing 
  inward as all portals of initiation necessarily do, are wide open, and it is 
  evident that they are intended to remain so.
   
  
  Is not this a 
  misinterpretation of the actual facts? is it not true that the portals of 
  Freemasonry are closed to all without, save when they are opened to them from 
  within? In a sense, yes, but not in the sense interpreted by this symbolic 
  representation. For the real door that opens into the Temple of Freemasonry is 
  not that of wood which swings upon its iron hinges, but the will, the purpose, 
  and the qualifications, mental and moral, which exist in a Due man. To all 
  such who are thus properly qualified the doors of Freemasonry are ever open. 
  Yea, in a real sense, as hinted by one of the old texts of the V.S.L., it is 
  the true and upright man who is himself the door to the Fraternity; for when 
  all is said and done, Freemasonry is not a thing of stones, wood, doors, 
  buildings, and external trappings, but rather is it a circle of open minds and 
  true hearts to which any man is welcome if he be worthy of such a place.
   
  
  Indeed, it is 
  everlastingly true that we can enter into nothing for which we are not 
  inwardly prepared. What is music to a man who has no music in his ear? Of what 
  use are vast libraries of books to him who cannot or will not read? what avail 
  ten thousand schools to one who prefers darkness to light? of what value are 
  all the just laws of a noble land to the citizen who has no conscience in his 
  breast? All the great true eternal things in life, the things which are life 
  itself, if life is to be anything more than mere existence, are for them only 
  who are truly prepared for them. The doors are ever open day and night. All 
  the millions of Freemasons cannot keep one man out of Freemasonry who is 
  already a Freemason in his soul.
   
  * * *
   
  GUILDS 
  AND MASON'S MARKS IN THE ORIENT
   
  
  Among the men of this 
  nation who are now doing most to rescue the rest of us from foggy thinking and 
  foolish creeds Professor John Dewey holds a privileged place, seeing that he 
  is a teacher of teachers, and a writer whose books are revered by young men 
  and women in all the continents. I do not know whether he is a Mason or not: 
  if he is not he should be, and could be too, for his great work on "Education 
  and Democracy" proves him worthy and well qualified. That he can write as well 
  as think, and is full of the human qualities of tenderness, humor, and 
  friendliness, is proved by his "Letters from China and Japan," a volume of 
  letters which he and his wife wrote back to their children during a year in 
  the Orient.
   
  
  But this is not a book 
  review. Ye scribe calls attention to the fact that "Letters from China and 
  Japan" contains two items of some interest to Masonic students. In a letter 
  written from Peking (page 261) Professor Dewey remarks, while writing of a 
  visit to the Higher Normal School of that city, that "the head of the 
  industrial department, who acted as our guide and host, has been organizing 
  the 'national industry' activity in connection with the student's agitation. 
  He is now, among other things, trying to organize apprentice schools under 
  guild control." To those who have supposed craft guilds a thing long extinct 
  this should prove a clue worth following. On page 72 is another item of 
  similar import, and proves how natural and how inevitable, and in all 
  countries, has been the employment of "mason's marks." While describing a 
  reception tendered him in the Arsenal Grounds at Tokyo he writes a paragraph 
  which shows that Japanese carpenters employed marks in the old times, just as 
  Masons did in England and on the Continent. "On one side the Imperial 
  Government is theocratie, and this is the most sensitive side, so that 
  historical criticism or analysis of old documents is not indulged in, the 
  Ancestors being Gods or the Gods being Ancestors. One bureaucratic gentleman 
  felt sure that the divine ancestors must have left traces of their own 
  language somewhere, so he investigated the old shrines, and sure enough he 
  found on sonle of the beams characters different from Chinese or Japanese. 
  These he copied and showed for the original language - till some carpenters 
  saw them and explained that they were the regular guild marks."
   
  
  Both China and Japan 
  are rich, historically and contemporaneously, in matters of peculiar interest 
  to Freemasons. The unfortunate thing is that much of the literature - perhaps 
  one should write it "literature"  - purporting to deal with secret societies, 
  guilds, etc., in the Orient has been produced by cotton-headed gentlemen 
  utterly devoid of accurate knowledge. The men and women of the Orient are 
  human beings, not magicians, sages, and miracle workers: their history is real 
  history to be studied like any other history; and they live in a real world 
  among cold facts where 2 plus 2 equals 4, as among us. Books about the Orient 
  should be written in the pragmatic spirit, which is to say, in the spirit that 
  pervades the letters of Professor Dewey, who is for the present the high 
  priest of pragmatism in this country.
   
  * * *
   
  WHEN 
  IS A MAN A "HIGHER GRADE" MASON?
   
  
  A Freemason is a man 
  who believes that the power of God is behind and beneath him, like the ground 
  under his feet, and that the love of God is over him like the sky: who 
  believes in the endlessness of human life; who believes that it is the nature 
  of man to be friendly; and who allies himself with the Honorable Society of 
  Ancient Free and Accepted Masons, in order to join with like-minded men in the 
  furtherance of such ideals. When such a Mason has by his intelligent 
  faithfulness surpassed the rank and file of his fellows so that he understands 
  and practices Freemasonry more than they do, he becomes entitled to enroll 
  among the members of the "higher grades." Unless his membership in those 
  honorable ranks is thus honestly won, all his badges and distinctions and the 
  long train of his titles are no more than the rattle of an empty wagon on the 
  street.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  
  INVITATION
  BY 
  BRO. GERALD NANCARROW, INDIANA
   
  "I 
  shall not gild thy house, my son," 
  
  Breathed God upon His plan.
  "I 
  have laid the chisel by thy side, 
  Come, 
  carve thyself a man."
   
  "For 
  even so near to me are Thou 
  That 
  were I less than I, 
  I 
  jealous were of mine own work 
  And 
  would not let thee try."
   
  "Come 
  build thee strong and true and high 
  With 
  these bright tools ye see, 
  A 
  kingly mansion, O my Son! 
  And 
  thou shalt rule with Me!"
   
  
  ----o----
   
  
  Masonic links compose a sacred chain
  Of 
  holy brightness and unmeasured length;
  The 
  world, with selfish rust and reckless stain,
  May 
  mar its beauty but not touch its strength.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  THE 
  LIBRARY
   
  THE 
  UNSEARCHABLE RICHES OF FREEMASONRY
   
  
  Mackey's Revised History of Freemasonry, Robert I. Clegg. Seven volumes, De 
  Luxe fabrikoid binding. Published by the Masonic History Company, 225 North 
  Michigan Avenue, Chicago, III. For sale by The National Masonic Research 
  Society, Anamosa, Iowa. Price $56.00.
   
  
  SOME FIELDS of reading 
  and research are complete in themselves, so that a man never exhausts them or 
  grows weary but finds his interest new every morning and his delight growing 
  by what it feeds upon. Subjects less rich in resources are exhausted at last 
  and pall upon one, but these larger subjects are inexhaustible so that nobody 
  ever comes to the end of them, and he who has given his life to them feels at 
  the end like Sir Isaac Newton who had merely snatched a handful of sand from 
  the limitless supplies of the ocean. All the major sciences, the fine arts, 
  the larger industries, some forms of business, and a few other fields more 
  difficult to classify, such as theology and philosophy, are of such a 
  character. They constitute in themselves a complete system of culture, so that 
  a man who makes himself at home with them achieves for himself an education 
  which, though it may always be enriched by additions from other sources, is 
  nevertheless complete and satisfying in and of itself. To become the servant 
  of any one of these major arts and sciences is to be put into possession of 
  those truths and uses of the mind whereby one becomes a matured man, fruitful 
  in labors and worthy of dignity and honor. He is like one that has won at last 
  to a mountain top - his position puts him into possession of the whole 
  country. And, so far as that is concerned, it matters little what mountain he 
  has elected for his own, if only it be one that gives him a commanding 
  position.
   
  
  Freemasonry is such a 
  subject. It is not as public as some, or as popular as others, and its nature 
  and extent may not always be known to its own sons, but for all that it is, 
  like one of the sciences, or professions, or an art, a world within the world, 
  a life inside life, a complete circle of interest inside of which any man may 
  find a rich culture. It infinitives itself in all directions, one of its 
  interests leading to another and that to a third and so on in an endless 
  chain, until one discovers that he who ascends the mount of Masonic learning 
  is master of one of the major peaks, and in possession of a vast country. "I 
  have been studying Masonry for thirty years," once remarked our veteran 
  colleague and brother, J.T. Thorp, "and don't know much about it now," the 
  contrast being not to the paucity of the rewards of such long study, but to 
  the inexhaustibleness of the subject studied. The life-long pursuit of Masonic 
  knowledge is one of the most richly rewarding activities in which any man can 
  engage. For, as Albert Pike wrote when himself grown old, "There is nothing 
  which will so well remunerate a man, when the days of his life are shortening 
  to the winter solstice, as faithful service in the true interest of Masonry." 
  The Craft is as large as the world itself, and somewhere or other connects 
  with every vital human interest on the periphery of life.
   
  "A 
  Mason's ways are 
  A type 
  of Existence; 
  And 
  his persistence 
  Is as 
  the days are 
  Of men 
  in this world."
   
  
  For these reasons I 
  refuse to think of Freemasonry as being merely a lodge, or even as being 
  nothing more than a Fraternity. Neither do I like to think of it as one among 
  many secret societies, which have a curious but not an urgent interest. 
  Freemasonry is one of the great public institutions like the home, government, 
  the courts, the church, and the public school. It has played its own great 
  part in history, and has for itself its own long chapter in the troubled 
  annals of our race. Our clubs and societies are little sanctuaries by the way, 
  kindly and cheerful places of refreshment. Freemasonry is a great home at the 
  end of the road in which men may find work, food and peace all their days. To 
  grow old in its service, to learn all its ways, to be a faithful son to it, is 
  to live such a life as that described in the First Psalm where a good man is 
  described as a tree planted by living waters.
   
  
  The riches of 
  Freemasonry do not lie on the surface. There are many obstacles to be met and 
  many difficulties to be overcome by the man who would possess himself of it, 
  especially if he seeks to appropriate it intellectually. The ritual is to the 
  casual member sealed and hidden and written in a dead language. The symbols 
  are as mute as the hieroglyphics of Egypt to one who has not the key. The 
  philosophy of the Craft is not a fool's paradise of easy ideas for children to 
  play with. Above all - and it is to this that I call special attention - the 
  history of the Order has not always been made safe or available to Masons, 
  especially to those without time or gifts for laborious research. There is no 
  virtue in these facts: quite the contrary! The ritual should be unsealed to 
  every Mason, the symbols interpreted, the philosophy be made plain, and the 
  story of the Craft straightforwardly told in plain language. There are many 
  mysteries, and necessarily so, in Freemasonry, but there need be no 
  mystification.
   
  
  To my own mind the 
  great value of the newly revised edition of Mackey's History of Freemasonry 
  lies in the fact that it now presents to each man a key to these unsearchable 
  riches of Masonry. In the language of one of the old mystics, "It puts a man 
  at home in the house." The Fraternity's own past, which is one of its greatest 
  treasures, and which, more than anything else, is fit to inspire a Mason with 
  reverence and love for it, is brought out into the open, into the sunlight, 
  and made available to the common man who can't read Hebrew, Greek, or Medieval 
  English.
   
  
  To read through these 
  seven volumes is like going on a journey through many lands, with stop-overs 
  in great cities, and side trips among ancient ruins. One begins with 
  Prehistoric Masonry. He reads the story of the various Legends of the Craft, 
  and learns about the Old Manuscripts, with digressions into the quaint stories 
  of Lamech's Sons, the Tower of Babel, the Legends of Nimrod, and the Legend of 
  Euclid. The origins of the Fraternity are admittedly a mystery but certain of 
  our great men have circulated hypotheses about it, and these are reviewed in 
  chapters on Anderson, Preston, Hutchinson and Oliver. The author then 
  undertakes an account of his own and begins, where it is necessary to begin, 
  with the Temple of Solomon: thereafter come the Dionysian Artificers, the 
  Ancient Mysteries, the Druids, the Crusades - a fascinating chapter - the 
  Scottish Templars, the Story of the House of Stuart, of the Jesuits, and of 
  the intriguing tale of Oliver Cromwell and his supposed connection with the 
  Order.
   
  
  This is but one-seventh 
  of the journey. In Volume II there is a much needed chapter on The Royal 
  Society. Then come the occult groups, the tale of which has been repeated 
  numberless times but never exhausted; the Astrologers, the Rosicrucians, the 
  Pythagoreans, the Gnostics, and the Essenes. Then follows an excellent 
  critical account of the Hiram Abif Legend, and the first main portion of the 
  work, Prehistoric Masonry, is completed.
   
  
  The History of 
  Freemasonry in the eyes of the author, and strictly so-called, begins on page 
  481, of Volume II, with the Roman Collegia. It is a great world in itself and 
  there is not space here to follow the itinerary further, or even to sketch in 
  an account of the main heads, which are very many. If any Mason is desirous of 
  possessing himself of the "unsearchable riches" of Masonry he can do so in 
  these seven volumes. To read them is an education, and a discipline that every 
  Mason owes to himself.
   
  
  The ground plan of this 
  magnum opus was laid out, and great stores of data accumulated, by Albert G. 
  Mackey, to whose enduring and gentle fame this issue of THE BUILDER is 
  dedicated. It was Dr. Mackey's hope to make this the crown of his life's labor 
  but unhappily death cut him off before he had completed it. Brother William R. 
  Singleton took his place and brought the manuscript to shape for publication 
  and gave it to the world in a shape now long familiar. It is probable that 
  more men have been given an adequate sense of the vast scope of Freemasonry by 
  this History than by any other work, with possibly the exception of the 
  Encyclopedia. But it happens that Mackey laid down his pen at the very time 
  when a new era of Masonic scholarship was reaching its meridian: Lyon, 
  Crawley, Gould, Speth, Hughan and many others of equal fame had organized a 
  new school of Masonic scholarship, and there is no telling what will yet be 
  the outcome of their labors, seeing that every year finds some new bit of the 
  hitherto unknown discovered, explored and claimed for Masonic knowledge. Owing 
  to this new uncovering of rich deposits of lore it became necessary at last to 
  revise the History. This difficult and responsible task was entrusted to the 
  general editorship of Brother Robert I. Clegg, than whom there is not in all 
  the land a better known or more beloved Masonic student and writer, and whose 
  name is thrice familiar to these pages. It is to him, and to the equally 
  indefatigable labors of Brother Walter C. Burrell, President of The Masonic 
  History Publishing Company, that we are indebted for the new edition of the 
  old familiar work.
   
  
  As to the calibre of 
  the scholarship revealed by Brother Clegg's work of revision I cannot do 
  better than to quote a paragraph from a letter from my friend David E. W. 
  Williamson, to whose learning this Society has been often indebted:
   
  
  “I have just completed 
  the seven volumes and am much impressed with it, as I wrote to Brother Clegg. 
  His own work is in evidence everywhere and the immense erudition displayed 
  makes the book a real Masonic library. The old history has been improved at so 
  many points as to make the Revised History virtually a new work. Dr. Gasho, a 
  brother who is much interested in all these things, has the edition to which 
  Singleton contributed, with the final chapter by Hughan, and it is only 
  necessary to compare volume by volume to realize that here Bro. Clegg and his 
  associates have brought every subject down to date."
   
  The 
  seven new volumes are a delight to see especially as regards the binding and 
  the illustrations. The index is very complete, and there are many footnotes. 
  Take it up one side and down the other it would be difficult anywhere to find 
  a set of books that will more easily enable a man of modest equipment and of 
  little leisure to make his own all "the height and depth, and length and 
  breadth, and the unsearchable riches" of Freemasonry. H.L. Haywood.
   
  * * *
   
  A NEW 
  EDITION OF MACKEY'S SYMBOLISM
   
  
  "Mackey's Symbolism of Freemasonry," revised by Robert I. Clegg; published by 
  Masonic History Company Chicago. De Luxe fabrikoid binding. For sale by 
  Nationai Masonic Research Society. Price $3.65 postpaid.
   
  
  Dear old Mackey! as one 
  turns over the aging pages of the old books he seems as near and as alive as 
  ever. He is always quiet, always gentle, and he never resorts to the tricks of 
  the writers' trade to capture attention, but for all that there is a certain 
  virility about him that age cannot wither or custom stale. Of all the writers 
  of the older school he is the most contemporaneous, and far and away the most 
  influential. More copies of his works are being sold today than of any recent 
  writer and there is no doubt but that this will long continue. Mackey is a 
  great and universal Masonic influence with whom every student and reader of 
  Masonry must acquaint himself.
   
  
  Mackey was at his best 
  in writing on the symbolism of Freemasonry. It was a task for which the bent 
  of his mind and the nature of his learning peculiarly fitted him. Later 
  writers, many of them, have been more scientific, and any number have been 
  more clever, but few have possessed that peculiar quality of mind that set 
  Mackey apart as a symbologist of the first order.
   
  
  Masonic symbolism is a 
  subject which, by virtue of its own nature, does not very rapidly outgrow 
  itself. Mackey issued the first edition of his "Symbolism of Freemasonry" in 
  1869. Since that date the whole field of Masonic scholarship has been 
  revolutionized from top to bottom; the school of Preston and Oliver has 
  vanished and time has outlawed most of what they wrote; but, owing to the 
  nature of the subject, there is comparatively little of the "Symbolism" that 
  must be altogether discarded. The famous "nineteen propositions" of the first 
  chapter which "contain a brief but succinct view of the progress of 
  Freemasonry," and the arguments concerning "The Noachidae" and "Primitive" and 
  "Spurious" "Freemasonry of Antiquity," are now of very little value, and so 
  with a few other pages here and there. Compared with the total bulk of the 
  work this is almost negligible.
   
  
  Brother Robert I. 
  Clegg, editor of the new edition of the book, has added two paragraphs to 
  Mackey's original Preface and has included a valuable chapter of his own by 
  way of "An Introduction to Symbolism," but elsewhere has made few changes.
   
  
  "Up to this point," 
  writes Brother Clegg in his addition to the Preface, "we have used the preface 
  written by the great student and need now but explain the work of revision. 
  Brother Mackey's examination of Masonic symbols is today as of yore admirable 
  and 
  stimulating. No 
  Freemason at all worthy of the name can read it without pleasure and profit. 
  All that was necessary for us to do was to make corrections of errors that 
  crept into the book, and add here and there such comments as seemed to us to 
  be most helpful to the reader in the light of our present-day knowledge of the 
  institution.
   
  
  "The chapter on an 
  Introduction to Symbolism is new and prepared by the reviser for this edition. 
  Here as elsewhere the purpose has been to do as Brother Mackey would no doubt 
  have wished the work to be done; to correct the text with every respect for 
  the lofty purpose of the original author, and to add such amendments as would 
  in the same way better facilitate the reader's progress."
   
  
  Again Brother Clegg 
  writes in his Introduction: "Brother Mackey put into his study of Symbolism 
  the ripened researches of many years. No other book of his more clearly shows 
  the depth of his reading and reflection. His was the wisdom that never lacked 
  words of simplest worth to make it known and understood. None so clearly as he 
  could fit lucid language to the exposition of what he knew of Freemasonry. And 
  none packed into his sentences more meaty food for reflection."
   
  
  The titles of the 
  thirty-two chapters will furnish a reader with a more adequate conception of 
  the contents of the book than a great deal of description could do. They are: 
  An Introduction to Symbolism; Preliminary, Origin and Progress of Freemasonry; 
  Noachidae; Primitive Freemasonry of Antiquity; Spurious Freemasonry of 
  Antiquity; Ancient Mysteries; Dionysiac Artificers; Union of Speculative and 
  Operative Freemasonry at the Temple of Solomon; Traveling Freemasons of the 
  Middle Ages; Disseverance of the Operative Element; System of Symbolic 
  Instruction; Speculative Science and the Operative Art; Symbolism of Solomon's 
  Temple; Form of the Lodge; Officers of a Lodge; Point within a Circle; 
  Covering of the Lodge; Ritualistic Symbolism; Rite of Discalceation; Rite of 
  Investiture; Symbolism of the Gloves; Rite of Circumambulation; Rite of 
  Intrusting, and Symbolism of Light; Symbolism of the Corner Stone; Ineffable 
  Name; Legends of Freemasonry; Legend of the Winding Stairs; Legend of the 
  Third Degree; Sprig of Acacia; Symbolism of Labor; Stone of Foundation; Lost 
  Word; and Synoptical Index.
   
  
  The new edition is 
  bound in De Luxe fahrikoid binding in color and design to match the revised 
  edition of Mackey's History of Freemasonry reviewed otherwhere in this issue.
   
  * * *
   
  THE 
  BOUND VOLUME OF THE BUILDER FOR 1922
   
  The 
  Bound Volume of TIIE BUILDER for 1922, bound in goldenrod buckram, title in 
  gilt, published by The National Masonic Research Society, Anamosa, Iowa. Price 
  postpaid $3.75
   
  
  This is to announce the 
  advent of the Bound Volume of THE BUILDER for 1922, copies of which may now be 
  had. Readers should investigate this bound 
  volume: many of them 
  will be surprised to discover how much it adds to the sightliness and 
  convenience of twelve issues of this journal. When each monthly issue is 
  printed a certain number of copies are especially prepared for binding. At the 
  end of each year these twelve especially printed copies are placed together 
  with a complete descriptive index of fourteen pages and securely bound in 
  goldenrod buckram, with title label in gold. No covers are bound in. Every 
  page is absolutely unused, and the whole is so numbered as to form a complete 
  book of about 375 pages of the same size as THE BUILDER. In the index is 
  furnished a guide to each and every item that has appeared during the year, 
  along with cuts, authors, books, etc., by means of which one can locate 
  anything at a moment's notice. The volume is beautiful in appearance, in 
  typography, paper, illustrations, arrangement and size. It is an ideal 
  Christmas gift for a Mason.
   
  
  This is the eighth of 
  such volumes thus far issued by The National Masonic Research Society. Taken 
  together these eight books constitute the most comprehensive and accurate 
  Masonic library in existence. They contain more than 400 complete signed 
  articles on important Masonic topics; hundreds of replies to questions about 
  Masonry; and editorials, letters, poems and book reviews on nearly every 
  matter of consequence connected with Freemasonry. Such a set of books is an 
  ideal foundation for a private Masonic library.
   
  
  Nothing is of merely 
  local or temporary interest. Everything is designed for permanency and for 
  universality. THE BUILDER does not reflect sectional views; it does not 
  represent any party or clique or rite; it is not published for commercial 
  purposes. For these reasons a set of the Bound Volumes is not a file of old 
  magazines, the interest of which must necessarily fade with the passage of 
  time, but a set of books, the first page of which is as interesting as the 
  last; an encyclopedia of Masonry, the value of which increases with the 
  addition of each new Bound Volume.
   
  
  Contained within this 
  set of books is a number of Masonic books published in serial form. He who 
  owns the set possesses Pound's "Philosophy of Freemasonry"; Pound's "Lectures 
  on Masonic Jurisprudence"; Ravenscroft's "The Comacines"; Haywood's 
  "Symbolical Masonry"; Haywood's "The Teachings of Masonry"; Wright's "Woman 
  and Freemasonry"; Wright's "Roman Catholicism and Freemasonry"; Pike's "Humanum 
  Genus"; Lawrence's "Military Lodges"; Barry's "The Story of Old Glory"; 
  Street's "Symbolism of the Three Degrees"; Goodwin's "Mormonism and Masonry," 
  etc.
   
  * * *
   
  A VEST 
  POCKET BOOK ON FREEMASONRY
   
  "What 
  is Masonry," by Francis E. Lester, P.G.M., New Mexico. Published by the 
  author, Mesilla Park, New Mexico.
   
  
  This is a vest pocket 
  volume on a big subject. Brother Lester tells us in his introductory page that 
  at the time he was raised he was unable to learn much about the institution of 
  which he had become a member, or of the ceremonies in which he had 
  participated. "The one thing that was missing was the kindly explanation by a 
  brother of what relation Masonry, with its teaching and ritual, bore to the 
  duties and responsibilities of daily life." This booklet of thirty pages, 
  bound in blue paper, is a "kindly explanation" of many of the things about 
  which a newly raised Mason is most anxious to learn, and to all such it is to 
  be recommended. On the last page there is a list of some twenty or so books 
  "suggested for supplementary reading": it is an excellent brief bibliography. 
  Copies may be secured from the author.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  
  PUBLICATIONS WANTED, FOR SALE, AND EXCHANGE
   
  
  We are constantly 
  receiving inquiries from readers as to where they may obtain publications on 
  Freemasonry and kindred subjects not offered in our Monthly Book List. Most of 
  the books thus sought are out of print, but it may happen that other readers, 
  owning copies, may be willing to dispose of the same. Therefore this column is 
  set aside each month for such a service. And it is also hoped - and expected - 
  that readers possessing very old or rare Masonic works will communicate the 
  fact to THE BUILDER in behalf of general information.
   
  
  Postoffice addresses 
  are here given in order that those buying and selling may communicate directly 
  with each other. Brethren are asked to cancel notices as soon as their wants 
  are supplied.
   
  
  In no case does TEIE 
  BUILDER assume any responsibility whatsoever for publications thus bought, 
  sold, exchanged or borrowed.
   
  WANTED
   
  
  By Bro. G. Alfred 
  Lawrence, 142 West 86th St., New York, N. Y.: Proceedings of the Scottish Rite 
  Body founded by Joseph Cerneau in New York City in 1808, of which De Witt 
  Clinton was the first Grand Commander, and which body became united, in 1867, 
  with the Supreme Council of the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction, A. & A. S. R. 
  Also Proceedings of the Supreme Council founded in New York by De La Motta, in 
  1813, by authority of the Southern Supreme Council, of which he was Grand 
  Treasurer-General, these Proceedings from 1813 to 1860.
   
  
  By Bro. Frank R. 
  Johnson, 306 East 10th St., Kansas City, Mo.: "The Year Book," published by 
  the Masonic Constellations, containing the History of the Grand Council, R. & 
  S. M., of Missouri.
   
  
  By Brother Silas H. 
  Shepherd, Hartland, Wisconsin: "Catalogue of the Masonic Library of Samuel 
  Lawrence"; "Second Edition of Preston's Illustrations of Masonry"; "The Source 
  of Measures," by J. Ralston Skinner 1875, or second edition 1894; "Ars Quatuor 
  Coronatorum," volumes I to XI inclusive.
   
  
  By Bro. Ernest E. Ford, 
  305 South Wilson Avenue, Alhambra, California: "Ars Quatuor Coronatorum," 
  volumes 3 and 7, with St. John's Cards, also St. John's Cards for volumes 4 
  and 6; "Masonic Review," volumes 1, 2, 7, 31, 32 and 43 to 60, inclusive; 
  "Voice of Masonry," volumes 2 to 12 inclusive, and volume 16; Transactions 
  Supreme Council Southern Jurisdiction for the years 1882 and 1886; Original 
  Proceedings of The General Grand Encampment Knights Templar for the years 1826 
  and 1836.
   
  
  By Bro. George A. 
  Lanzarotti, Casilla 126, Rancagua, Chile: All kinds of Masonic literature in 
  Spanish. Write first quoting prices.
   
  
  By Brother L. Rask, 14 
  Alvey St., Schenectady, N. Y.: "Remarks upon Alchemy and the Alchemists," by 
  E. A. Hitchcock, Janesville, N. Y., about 1866; "The Secret Societies of all 
  Ages and Countries," by C. W. Heckethorn; "Lost Language of Symbolism," by 
  Harold Bayley, published by Lippincott; "Sacred Hermeneutics," by Davidson, 
  Edinburgh, 1843; "Solar System of the Ancients Discovered," by J. Wilson, 
  published by Longmans Co., London, 1856; "The Alphabet," by Isaac Taylor, 
  Kegan, Paul, Trench 
  & Co., 1883, or 
  the edition of 1899 published by Scribners, New York; "Anacalypsis," by 
  Godfrey Higgins, 1836, published by Longmans, Green 
  & 
  Co., London; "Ars Quatuor Coronatorum," any volume or volumes.
   
  
  By Brother N. W. J. 
  Haydon, 664 Pape Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: "The Beautiful Necessity," 
  and "Architecture and Democracy," by Claude Bragdon.
   
  
  By the National Masonic 
  Research Society, Anamosa, Iowa: "Discourses upon Architecture," by Dallaway, 
  published in 
  1833; any or all 
  volumes of "The American Freemasons' Magazine," published by J. F. Brennan, 
  about 1860.
   
  
  By Brother E. A. Marsh, 
  820 Broad Ave. 
  N. W., Canton, Ohio: "Numbers: Their Occult Power and Mystic Virtue," by 
  William Wynn Westcott, published 
  1902 by the 
  Theosophical Publishing Society.
   
  
  By Bro. D. D. 
  Berolzheimer, 1 Madison Ave., New York, N. Y.: "Realities of Masonry," Blake, 
  1879; "Records 
  of the Hole Craft and Fellowship of Masons," Condor, 
  1894; "Masonic 
  Bibliography," Carson, 1873; "Origin of 
  Freemasonry," Paine, 1811.
   
  FOR 
  SALE
   
  
  By Brother A. A. 
  Burnand, 690 
  South Bronson Ave., Los Angeles, California: Various Masonic publications 
  including such as a complete set of "Ars Quatuor Coronatorum"; "History of 
  Freemasonry in Scotland," by D. Murray Lyon, (original edition); Thomas 
  Dunckerley, Laurence Dermott, etc.
   
  
  By Brother Frank R. 
  Johnson, 306 
  East 10th St., Kansas City, Mo.: "History of Freemasonry," Mitchell, 2 
  volumes, sheep; "History of Freemasonry," Robert Freke Gould, 
  4 volumes, cloth 
  in good condition; "History of Freemasonry," Albert G. Mackey, 
  7 volumes, linen 
  cloth, new; Addison's "Knights Templar," Macoy, 1 volume, cloth; "Museum of 
  Antiquity," Yaggy, 1 volume, morocco; "History and Cyclopedia of Freemasonry," 
  Macoy and Oliver, new, full morocco. Also miscellaneous books.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  THE 
  QUESTION BOX
   
  
  THE BUILDER is an open 
  forum for free and fraternal discussion. Each of its contributors writes under 
  his own name, and is responsible for his own opinions. Believing that a unity 
  of spirit is better than a uniformity of opinion, the Research Society, as 
  such, does not champion any one school of Masonic thought as over against 
  another, but offers to all alike a medium for fellowship and instruction, 
  leaving each to stand or fall by its own merits.
   
  
  The Question Box and 
  Correspondence Column are open to all members of the Society at all times. 
  Questions of any nature on Masonic subjects are earnestly invited from our 
  members, particularly those connected with lodges or study clubs which are 
  following our Study Club course. When requested, questions will be answered 
  promptly by mail before publication in this department.
   
  
  INFORMATION ABOUT THE PUBLIC SCHOOL CRISIS
   
  
  THE BUILDER for August 
  interested me more than any copy I have ever seen. My copy is worn out with 
  lending. Can you tell me where I can find some more literature like it? 
  M.L.B., Virginia.
   
  
  The Bureau of Social 
  and Educational Service of the Grand Lodge of New York issued as their 
  Bulletin No. 3, for March 2, 1922, a twenty-four page booklet on "The Public 
  School Crisis," in which was incorporated a valuable list of up-to-date 
  pamphlets and booklets on the subject, written from every possible angle. The 
  list could not be improved.
   
  
  American City Bureau, 
  154 Nassau Street, New York. Ask for "Know and Help Your Schools," Third 
  Report of National Committee for Chamber of Commerce Cooperation with the 
  Public Schools. George D. Strayer, Chairman.
   
  
  American Council of 
  Education, Washington, D. C. Ask for reprint from School and Society, Vol. 13, 
  No. 321, article by Samuel P. Capen.
   
  
  American Legion Weekly, 
  627 West 43d Street, New York. Ask for issue of Dec. 2, 1921, article, "The 
  American's Part in Americanism," by Warren G. Harding. Also Report of 
  Conference of Board of Directors of National Education Association and 
  Representatives of the American Legion, June 3, 1921, at Des Moines, Iowa.
   
  
  American Physical 
  Education Review, 93 Westford Avenue, Springfield, Mass. Ask for "Report of 
  Committee of Society of Directors of Physical Education in Colleges." Also 
  "The Aims and Scope of Physical Education."
   
  
  Mrs. Rogers H. Bacon, 
  210 E. 61st Street, New York City, Chairman, Plan and Program Committee, 
  Women's Clubs of Greater New York. Ask for "Report to Board of Education on 
  School Building Conditions in New York City."
   
  
  Boston League of Women 
  Voters, 553 Little Building, Boston, Mass. Ask for "How Our United States 
  Spends Its Income," Leaflet, by E. B. Bosa.
   
  
  The Bureau of the 
  Census, Washington, D. C. Ask for circular, "Composition and Characteristics 
  of the Population." Also "Men and Women of Voting Age." Also "Citizenship of 
  the Foreign Born."
   
  
  United States Bureau of 
  Education, Washington, D.C. Ask for "Report of the Commissioner for the year 
  ended June 30, 1921." Also "Education for the Establishment of Democracy," 
  Address by P. P. Claxton, late Commissioner of Education. Also "Cost of 
  Education in the United States," Circular by P. P. Claxton. Also "Expenditures 
  for Public Education in New York," Circular by P. P. Claxton.
   
  
  Bureau of 
  Naturalization, Washington, D. C. Ask for "Annual Report of the Commissioner."
   
  
  Chamber of Commerce of 
  the United States, Washington, D. C. Ask for "Schools, Citizenship, and 
  Business," Civic Development Publication No. 4.
   
  
  Committee on Education, 
  House of Representatives, Washington, D. C. Ask for "Hearing on Illiteracy 
  under H R 15402."
   
  
  The National Catholic 
  Weekly, 225 West 39th Street, New York. Ask for "The Case Against the 
  Smith-Towner Bill; Shall the Federal Government Control Our Schools ?" 
  Pamphlet by Paul H. Blakely, Ph.D.
   
  
  National Education 
  Association, 1201 16th Street N. W., Washington, D. C. Ask for "American 
  Education Week," December 4-10, 1921," Bulletin No. 16. Also "A National 
  Program for Education," Pamphlet. Also "Education and the Federal Government," 
  Pamphlet, by Hugh S. Magill. Also "The SmithTowner Bill; A Discussion of Its 
  Fundamental Principles and Brief History of Movement for a Department of 
  Education," Pamphlet, by Hugh S. Magill.
   
  
  Hon. Horace M. Towner, 
  House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. H R 7. Ask for copy of 
  "Towner-Sterling Bill."
   
  
  Public Education 
  Association, 8 West 40th Street, New York. Ask for "A Primer of Public School 
  Progress." Also Bulletins Nos. 4, 25, 104, 105, 106, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 
  114, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120.
   
  
  Russell Sage 
  Foundation, Lexington Avenue and 22d Street, New York. Ask for "Trend of 
  School Costs," by Warren Randolph Burgess. $1.00.
   
  
  School and Society, 11 
  Liberty Street, Utica, N. Y. Ask for Inaugural Address of Frank Pierrepont 
  Graves, as Commissioner of Education for the State of New York, "A State and 
  Its Edcation," Vol. 14, No. 357.
   
  
  University of the State 
  of New York, Albany, N. Y. Ask for "Americanization in Industry," by Caroline 
  A. Whipple. Also "Community Organization and Program for Americanization 
  Work," by William C. Smith. Also "Education Law as Amended to July 1, 1920," 
  Bulletin 707. Also "Financial Independence of Boards of Education," Pamphlet 
  by Frank B. Gilbert. Also "Immigrant Education," by William C. Smith. Also 
  "Organization and Administration of Part-Time Schools," Bulletin No. 697. Also 
  "School Health Service and Medical Inspection Law."
   
  * * *
   
  
  SCOTTISH RITE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES
   
  
  Can we tell me how many 
  of our Presidents have been members of the Scottish Rite? M. K. L., Indiana.
   
  
  Your query was referred 
  to Brother William L. Boyden, Librarian of the Supreme Council, Southern 
  Jurisdiction, who kindly gave us information as follows:
   
  
  James A. Garfield was a 
  member of the 14th degree of the Rite and made so in Mithras Lodge of 
  Perfection, Washington, D. C., January 2, 1872.
   
  
  Andrew Johnson received 
  the degrees from the 4th to the 32nd by communication, June 20, 1867, at the 
  White House.
   
  
  Warren G. Harding 
  received the 32nd degree in Scioto Consistory, Columbus, Ohio, January 5, 
  1921, and has been elected for the 33rd in the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction.
   
  * * *
   
  POEM 
  WANTED
   
  
  I am in search of a 
  poem based on the letters on the keystone and beginning with "H." The first 
  lines are:
   
  "Happy 
  the man whose thoughts will bear
  The 
  rigid test of the compasses and square." 
   
  Can 
  some brother help me out? F. H. C., Wisconsin.
   
  Will 
  some reader please give us this poem?
   
  * * *
   
  STARRY 
  DECKED HEAVEN
   
  
  Please inform me what 
  is meant by a phrase in the monitor about the "clouded canopy or starry decked 
  heaven." It is the word "decked" that puzzles me. B. M. T., Idaho.
   
  
  The word is of medieval 
  origin and appears to have been common to Teutonic peoples. In old English it 
  appears as "deccan" and means "to thatch over or cover a house," by which it 
  is seen to belong to the same group of words - so far as our ideas are 
  concerned - as our "tiler." From this use it came in time to signify generally 
  any covering or clothing, and more especially fine clothing, as when we now 
  say of a woman that she is "decked out in finery." Hence also the word 
  "bedecked." The old Coverdale Bible of 1535 used the word in at least two 
  instances: "She coloured her face, and decked her headed II Kings, ix, 30. 
  "Thou deckest thyself with light as it were with a garment." Psalms, ciii, 2.
   
  
  This makes clear the 
  meaning of the phrase about which you inquire. "The starry decked heaven" is 
  the night sky covered, or clothed, with stars. It is real poetry, worthy of 
  Shakespeare.
   
  * * *
   
  THE 
  CEDARS OF THE FORESTS OF LEBANON
   
  Can 
  you kindly furnish me with some information about the Cedars of Lebanon? I am 
  studying the First degree.
  C.H.L., 
  Wisconsin.
   
  After 
  looking through a number of Masonic articles on this subject we discovered 
  that the article in the Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 5, page 594, contains 
  all such information as well as much beside: accordingly we are reprinting 
  here that entire account:
   
  Cedrus 
  Libani, the far-famed Cedar of Lebanon, is a tree which, on account of its 
  beauty, stateliness and strength, has always been a favourite with poets and 
  painters, and which, in the figurative language of prophecy, is frequently 
  employed in the Scriptures as a symbol of power, prosperity and longevity. It 
  grows to a vertical height of from 50 to 80 ft. - "exalted above all trees of 
  the field" - and at an elevation of about 6000 ft above sea-level.  In the 
  young tree, the bole Is straight and upright and one or two leading branches 
  rise above the rest.  As the tree increases in size, however, the upper 
  branches become mingled together, and the tree is then clump-headed.  Numerous 
  lateral ramifying branches spread out from the main trunk in a horizontal 
  direction, tier upon tier, covering a compass of ground the diameter of which 
  is often greater than the height of the tree.  William Gilpin, in his Forest 
  Scenery, describes a cedar which, at an age of about 118 years, had attained 
  to a height of 53 ft. and had a horizontal expanse of 96 ft.  The branchlets 
  of the cedar take the same direction as the branches, and the foliage is very 
  dense.  The tree, as with the rest of the fir-tribe, except the larch, is 
  evergreen; new leaves are developed every spring, but their fall is gradual.  
  In shape the leaves are straight, tapering, cylindrical and pointed; they are 
  about 1 in. long wad of a dark green color, and grow in alternate tufts of 
  about thirty in number.  The male and female flowers grow on the same tree, 
  but are separate.  The cones, which are on the upper side of the branches, are 
  flattened at the ends and are 4 to 5 in. in length and 2 in. wide; they take 
  two years to come to perfection and while growing exude much resin.  The 
  scales are close pressed to one another and are reddish in color.  The seeds 
  are provided with a long membranous wing.  The root of the tree is very strong 
  and ramifying.  The cedar flourishes best on sandy, loamy soils. It still 
  grows on Lebanon, though for several centuries it was believed to be 
  restricted to a small grove in the Kadisha valley at 6000 ft. elevation, about 
  15 m. from Beyrout.  The number of trees in this grove has been gradually 
  diminishing, and as no young trees or seedlings occur, the grove will probably 
  become extinct in course of time.  Cedars are now known to occur in great 
  numbers on Mt.  Lebanon, chiefly on the western slopes, not forming a 
  continuous forest but in groves, some of which contain several thousands of 
  trees.  There are also large forests on the higher slopes of the Taurus and 
  Anti-Taurus mountains.  Lamartine tells us that the Arabs regard the trees as 
  endowed with the principles of continual existence, and with reasoning and 
  prescient powers, which enable them to prepare for the changes of the seasons.
   
  The 
  wood of the cedar of Lebanon is fragrant, though not so strongly scented as 
  that of the juniper or red-cedar of America.  The wood is generally 
  reddish-brown, light and of a coarse grain and spongy texture, easy to work, 
  but liable to shrink and warp.  Mountain-grown wood is harder, stronger, less 
  liable to warp and more durable.
   
  The 
  cedar of Lebanon is cultivated in Europe for ornament only.  It can be grown 
  in parks and gardens, and thrives well; but the young,plants are unable to 
  bear great variations of temperature.  The cedar is not mentioned in Evelyn's 
  Silva (1664), but it must have been introduced shortly afterwards.  The famous 
  Enfield cedar was planted by Dr. Robert Uvedale (1642-1722), a noted 
  schoolmaster and horticulturist, between 1662-1670, and an old cedar at Bretby 
  Park in Derbyshire is known to have been planted in 1676.  Some very old 
  cedars exist also at Syon House, Woburn Abbey, Warwick Castle and elsewhere, 
  which presumably date from the 17th century.  The first cedars in Scotland 
  were planted at Hopetoun House in 1740; and the first one said to have been 
  introduced into France was brought from England by Bernard de Jussieu in 1734, 
  and placed in the Jardin des Plantes.  Cedar-wood is earliest noticed in 
  Leviticus xiv, 4, 6, where it is prescribed among the materials to be used for 
  the cleansing of leprosy; but the wood there spoken of was probably that of 
  the juniper.  The term Eres (cedar) of Scripture does not apply strictly to 
  one kind of plant, but was used indefinitely in ancient times, as is the word 
  cedar at present.  The term arz is applied by the Arabs to the cedar of 
  Lebanon, to the common pine-tree, and to the juniper; and certainly the 
  "cedars" for masts, mentioned in Ezek xxvii. 5, must have been pine-trees. It 
  seems very probable that the fourscore thousand hewers employed by Solomon for 
  cutting timber did not confine their operations simply to what would now be 
  termed cedars and fir-trees.  Dr. John Lindley considered that some of the 
  cedar-trees sent by Hiram, king of Tyre, to Jerusalem might have been procured 
  from Mount Atlas, and have been Callitris quadrivalvis, or arar-tree, the wood 
  of which is hard and durable, and was much in request in former times for the 
  building of temples.  The timber-work of the roof of Cordova cathedral, built 
  eleven centuries ago, is composed of it.  In the time of Vitravius "cedars" 
  were growing in Crete, Africa and Syria.  Pliny says that their wood was 
  everlasting, and therefore images of the gods were made of it; he makes 
  mention also of the oil of cedar, or cedrium, distilled from the wood, and 
  used by the ancients for preserving their books from moths and damp; papyri 
  anointed or rubbed with cedrium were on this account called ced ati libri.  
  Drawers of cedar or chips of the wood are now employed to protect furs and 
  woollen stuffs from injury by moths. Cedar-wood, however, is said to be 
  injurious to natural history objects, and to instruments placed in cabinets 
  made of it, as the resinous matter of the wood becomes deposited upon them.  
  Cedria, or cedar resin, is a substance similar to mastic, that flows from 
  incisions in the tree; and cedar manna is a sweet exudation from its branches.
   
  * * *
   
  
  DUFFY'S "ORIGINAL THOUGHTS"
   
  
  Can you tell me 
  anything about a book called "Original Thoughts," by Duffy? I imagine that it 
  may be out of print now. L.D.S., South Carolina.
   
  
  "Original Thoughts" was 
  written by Brother Frank M. Duffy and published in 1868. Of the author himself 
  no memorials are at hand (unless perchance some reader of these pages may have 
  a record filed away), save that he was a member of Union Lodge No. 113, 
  Xartsville, Tennessee. He must have been a man of noble character and fine 
  mind, else his book misrepresents him, for it is one of the most beautiful 
  essays on Freemasonry that ye scribe has ever read. It was composed in a day 
  when Freemasonry was identified with Geometry, and Geometry itself was, after 
  the ancient fashion of Plato, deemed a revelation of the Eternal mind: 
  therefrom arose a blend of scientific speculation and religious mysticism very 
  seldomly met with now. "Original Thoughts" does not call into question any of 
  those views of Masonic history given currency by Dr. Oliver and his school and 
  is to that extent out of date, but the spirit in which the little book was 
  conceived will never fall from date unless it should turn out - which may God 
  prevent - that men will cease to feel reverence, wonder, and worship in the 
  depths of their nature. One of the few copies now known to exist is in the 
  possession of Brother J. E. Gwin, Hartsville, Tennessee.
   
  * * *
   
  
  AN AUTHENTIC BOOK ON 
  SOLOMON'S TEMPLE
   
  
  Can you tell me where I 
  might purchase an authentic book on King Solomon's Temple, containing 
  illustrations? C.T.R., Ohio.
   
  
  Among the well-nigh 
  numberless books on the subject that might be mentioned two or three will 
  doubtless serve your purposes: "Solomon's Temple: Its History and Its 
  Structure," by the Rev. W. Shaw Caldecott. Preface by A. H. Sayce. The Union 
  Press, 1816 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia. "The Tabernacle: Its History and 
  Structure," by same author and publisher. "The Temple, Its Ministry and 
  Services as they were at the Time of Jesus Christ," by Dr. Alfred Edersheim; 
  Hodder and Stoughton, New York. Captain Jerome B. Frisbee, Lindsay, 
  California, has published a book on the Temple very complete in diagrams and 
  illustrations and unique in its interpretations.
   
  
  ----o----
   
  
  CORRESPONDENCE
   
  A 
  RECORD AS SECRETARY
   
  
  I saw in the March 
  number of THE BUILDER (page 96) an account of Brother Arelius M. Willoughby 
  who had served as Secretary of Vincennes Lodge No. 1 of Vincennes, Indiana, 
  from 1876 to the present time excepting one year when he was elected Master, 
  making 45 years of service as Secretary, which is a record hard to beat.
   
  
  Now I am somewhat of an 
  antique secretary myself I was elected secretary of Roger Williams Lodge No 
  32, F. & A. M., of Centerdale, Rhode Island, March 4, 1876, and have served 
  eontinuously to the present time June 10, 1922, and am still at it and am on 
  my 47th year of continuous service, which is the record for Rhode Island. I 
  congratulate Vincennes Lodge for having so interested and faithful a brother 
  for their secretary and hope he may live many years to enjoy the honor and 
  pleasures of a well spent life. Frank C. Angell, Rhode Island.
   
  * * *
   
  
  PERFECT CRAFTSMAN DEGREE
   
  
  In order to stimulate 
  interest in its work as a degree team, the Fellowcraft Association connected 
  with St. John's Lodge No. 3 A.F. & A.M. of Bridgeport, Connecticut, has 
  perfected an initiatory form, which is used to initiate its new candidates 
  into the Association, and teach them some of the duties connected with the 
  privileges extended.
   
  
  After being organized 
  for thirteen years, it was found by experience that the members of the 
  Association, like the old saying "A new broom sweeps clean," came in the front 
  door, so to speak, and after a few years work gradually passed out the back 
  door, and new recruits took their places on the teams.
   
  
  In order to make the 
  work more interesting and attractive, the idea of having a little side degree 
  was hit upon, and as a novelty used to "razz" some of the popular members, 
  worked successfully for a while. It hit the nail on the head because "all work 
  and no play makes Jack a dull boy." Then the War came along, and many of the 
  boys were called to service, and scattered to the furthermost parts of the 
  earth. When they returned they still remembered the joys of the gatherings 
  held before their departure, and the ball was started rolling for something 
  bigger and better. Accordingly, a committee was appointed for the purpose of 
  revising the ritual used. That committee did their work so well that the 
  degree at once came to be known as the "Perfected Craftsman's Degree" from 
  which the present name of "Perfect Craftsman Degree" came.
   
  
  The Perfect Craftsman 
  Degree is based on Masonic history and traditions, and practically opposite in 
  form from Blue Lodge work. The degree impresses on the mind of the candidate 
  the importance of his Masonic ties and obligations, and presents them to him 
  in a manner that makes an indellible impression upon his mind. The degree 
  instructs and amuses at the same time. In order to be sure that there was 
  nothing used in the work that would, in any way, conflict with Masonic Law and 
  Practices the ritual was submitted to the present Grand Master of Masons in 
  Connecticut, M.’.W.’. Frank L. Wilder, who referred the matter to a committee 
  for examination and recommendation, the result being that the degree work was 
  found to be all right and was endorsed as "harmless."
   
  
  The ritual uses a 
  vocabulary of its own; a local Association is known as a quarry, a chair as a 
  stone, etc. Since the new ritual was used for the first time last October 
  (1921) nine new quarries have been organized, and four more are about to be 
  started. The fact is that the movement, which has many aims along social 
  development lines, has grown so rapidly that the original Degree Committee has 
  had to reorganize into what is known as the "Activity Committee of Perfect 
  Craftsman Quarries of Connecticut." The said committee is organized solely for 
  the purpose of developing the social side of Masonry. Plans are being 
  formulated for the arrangement of a schedule of fraternal visits for the 
  balance of the present season, and the winter of 1922-23, and for a monster 
  Field Day for all Blue Lodge Masons residing within the State of Connecticut, 
  to be held at some central point durmg the summer at which time a gathering, 
  which will be a credit to the Masonic institution, will be held.
   
  
  The movement started 
  is one of great 
  importance to the Fraternity. It means that the young blood in the Order is 
  beginning to circulate, and it spells life and action for the future. The 
  motto of the movement is "Service, Sociability, and Cooperation": service to 
  the Master of the Blue Lodge that the Quarry is organized to serve, 
  sociability among the various quarries, and thereby closer cooperative work on 
  subjects vital to the welfare and advancement of our art.
   
  
  The Master of the Blue 
  Lodge that the individual quarries are organized in, is the head of the 
  quarry, and is known as the "Master of Light." At a recent meeting of the 
  Perfect Craftsmen held in Fair Haven, the lodge room was overcrowded, and the 
  spirit that prevailed among the members was wonderful. During the proper part 
  of the meeting, all of the Masters present spoke in favor of the movement; all 
  testified to the great amount of good it had done their work already by the 
  true service and stimulating interest it has brought about without any 
  advertising effort or cost.
   
  
  Brother Howard W. 
  Gorham, 36 Harmony Street, Bridgeport, Conn., is acting as the Chairman of the 
  Activity Committee referred to, and stands ready to give any "Service to 
  Masonry" information requested in regard to the movement, on behalf of the 
  quarries in Connecticut, to sister jurisdictions.
   
  
  Good buttons of special 
  design have been made up and serve to identify the workers on the various 
  teams in the Blue Lodge.
   
  
  The advantages of a 
  local quarry are numerous. The degree work gives the incoming master of the 
  Blue Lodge an opportunity to select men of talent and service when making his 
  appointments to the various stations of trust and work.
   
  
  It is said that in 
  every lodge where a Quarry has been established there is a revival of interest 
  and a great outpouring of members to the meetings, and all activities of the 
  Blue Lodge. It 
  is the 
  inexorable law of the Craft to press forward and never turn back until their 
  work is completed - "Service to Masonry" is the slogan. Ray V. Denslow, 
  Missouri.
   
  * * *
   
  MORE 
  INFORMATION ABOUT GENERAL ARTHUR SAINT CLAIR
   
  
  I was very much pleased 
  with Admiral Baird's article on General Saint Clair in the July "THE BUILDER," 
  as I always am with anything he writes.
   
  
  There is one feature he 
  overlooked and which I trust he will pardon me for mentioning as it is a 
  matter which should never be forgotten when speaking of General Arthur Saint 
  Clair. That is, he was a member of the well-known Saint Clair or Sinclair 
  family whose head, William Sinclair of Roslyn, was the hereditary Grand Master 
  when the Grand Lodge of Scotland was formed. In this Sinclair family the Grand 
  Mastership had been handed down for over 200 years, according to the Scottish 
  traditions. The Encyclopedia Brittannica tells of Thurso castle, near the town 
  of Thurso, which is 367 miles north of Edinburgh and which town is noted for 
  its stone quarries to this day.
   
  
  General Arthur Saint 
  Clair was born at Thurso castle in 1734 and hence was only two years younger 
  than Washington. The Grand Lodge of Scotland was formed in 1736, two years 
  after his birth, and the head of the elder branch was still the Grand Master 
  when he was born. He came to America in 1758 as an ensign in the Royal 
  American regiment, known as the 60th foot, of which Colonel John Young, who 
  had been for thirty years the Deputy Grand Master of Scotland, was the 
  colonel. The man who succeeded Colonel Young was Colonel Augustine Prevost who 
  was created a Grand Inspector-General of the Scottish Rite by Stephen Morin in 
  1762, the same year in which Arthur Saint Clair resigned his commission in the 
  British army, married in Boston, and became an American. There is no doubt but 
  that he was a Master Mason at that time, as there was a military lodge in his 
  regiment of which Colonel Young was the Master while Arthur Saint Clair was an 
  officer.
   
  
  He settled in the 
  Ligonier Valley in Pennsylvania, near Bedford, and lived there for twelve 
  years. When the Revolutionary War broke out he joined forces with the 
  colonists to whom his military knowledge was of value, he being created a 
  colonel of militia in 1775. 
  His being a 
  Scottish Mason, or Mason of the Scottish Rite, brought him in close connection 
  with Washington whose lodge at Fredericksburg was also a Scottish lodge with a 
  charter from the Grand Lodge of Scotland as were the majority of the lodges in 
  America which favored the cause of the patriots. Such were the famous St. 
  Andrews' lodge of Boston, and the Provincial Grand Lodge of which Dr. Joseph 
  Warren was the Grand Master which organized lodges in all the New England 
  colonies and likewise in Virginia, North Carolina and others of the colonies.
   
  
  The members of the 
  English lodges chartered under the Grand Lodge of England were Tories, almost 
  to a man, while the Scotch lodges were nearly all revolutionists. I called the 
  attention of readers of THE BUILDER to the fact that we American Masons owe 
  but little to English Masonry, as most of the Revolutionary Fathers were 
  Scottish Masons and took their degrees in lodges which were chartered by the 
  Grand Lodge of Scotland. For these reasons, it is well to bring out the 
  connection of General Arthur Saint Clair with the Sinclairs of Rosslyn.
   
  
  I was much interested 
  in the account of the visit in Scotland of Grand Commander Cowles of the 
  Scottish Rite which was published in the July number of the "New Age." Brother 
  Cowles has been the Grand Master of Kentucky and in his article he called 
  attention to the similarity of the Scotch work with that of Kentucky while the 
  English work was much different. We owe our Masonry in America to Scotland, 
  our work is Scottish and not English, and this is as it should be. California 
  work comes from a Scotch lodge of Connecticut under P.G.M. Warren, Provincial 
  Grand Master under Scotland. Cyrus 
  Field Willard, California.
   
  * * *
   
  A 
  SKETCH OF GILES FONDA YATES
   
  
  Interested by an item 
  concerning Giles Fonda Yates that appeared in THE BUILDER, April, 1922, page 
  125, brethren of the Valley of Schenecteday, New York, sent to us a copy of 
  their beautifully printed "Memorial of the Presentation of Charters" which 
  contained a condensed biographical account of Yates, all of which, as 
  containing valuable data concerning one of the most illustrious of Masonic 
  careers, is here republished:
   
  GILES 
  FONDA YATES, AND THE DELTA LODGE OF PERFECTION, NO. 1, OF THE CITY OF 
  SCHENECTADY
   
  
  Condensed from an 
  article by Isaac H. Vrooman, Jr., 32d, printed in the Proceedings Council of 
  Deliberation, State of New York, A.A.S.R., 1914, to whom due acknowledgment is 
  made.
   
  
  Giles Fonda Yates was 
  born in Schenectady, November 8, 1798, the son of John and Margaret (Fonda) 
  Yates. His great-great-grandfather, Joseph Yates, emigrated from England and 
  settled in Albany, in 1664, and his great-grandfather, Robert Yates, came to 
  Schenectady in 1711. He was graduated from Union College in the Class of 1816, 
  with Phi Beta Kappa rank, and later received the degree of Master of Arts. He 
  was by profession a counsellor-at-law and held the office of Surrogate of 
  Schenectady County from 1821 to 1840. For many years he edited the Schenectady 
  Democrat and Reflector, and contributed to that paper an extensive and 
  interesting series of articles on the early history of Schenectady, which have 
  formed the basis of most of the published history of that city.
   
  
  He was initiated an 
  Entered Apprentice in Morton Lodge, No. 87, of Schenectady, on October 23, 
  1820, and received the degrees of Fellow Craft and Master Mason on October 27, 
  1820. On December 15, 1820, he was elected Senior Deacon of Morton Lodge and 
  the following year Senior Warden; to which office he was reselected in 1822, 
  but was not advanced in 1823. On December 7, 1824, he affiliated with St. 
  George's Lodge, No. 6, but did not sign the by-laws until June 24, 1825. 
  W.’.Bro.’. Yates served as Master of St. George's Lodgre in 1826 and 1827, and 
  again in 1844 and 1845, and was one of the survivors of the Morgan trouble who 
  helped to keep Masonry alive in Schenectady. He was also a Royal Arch Mason 
  and Knight Templar.
   
  
  It is not known when he 
  received the Scottish Rite degrees but it must have been during 1821, for in 
  the minutes of Ineffable Lodge of Perfection, Albany, under date of January 
  31, 1822, he is recorded as Senior Grand Warden. For many years Ill.’.Bro.’. 
  Yates was connected with the affairs of Ineffable Lodge of Perfection of 
  Albany.
   
  
  In the fall of 1820, 
  with the consent of its surviving members, the Lodge of Perfection, which had 
  become dormant, was re-established under the appellation of Delta Lodge of 
  Perfection, and placed under the jurisdiction of a Grand Council of Princes of 
  Jerusalem, which had been opened previously in the City of Schenectady. The 
  minutes of Delta Lodge of Perfection, Schenectady, are to be found copied in 
  the Minute Book of Ineffable Lodge, commencing October 5, 1821, and preceded 
  by the stubs of two leaves which have been removed. These stubs bear evidence 
  of meetings having been held in 1820.
   
  
  Delta Lodge of 
  Perfection continued to meet at Schenectady until 1825, when it was, by the 
  consent of its members, removed to Albany. Ill.’.Bro.’. Yates was Grand Master 
  of Delta Lodge during the five years of its existence at Schenectady.
   
  
  The only printed 
  reference to Delta Lodge of Perfection is found in the Proceedings of the 
  Grand Chapter, R.A.M., of New York, under date of October 8, 1823, at an 
  "Emergency Convocation," called for the purpose of celebrating the passage of 
  the "first boat from the Grand Erie Canal into the Hudson River at Albany." 
  "Delta Grand Lodge of Perfection, No. 1, of the City of Schenectady," attended 
  and joined in the procession.
   
  
  Ill.’.Bro.’. Yates 
  received the 33d on October 24, 1825, from Ill.’.Bro.’. John Barker, special 
  Deputy of the Supreme Council of Charleston, S. C.
   
  
  In 1828, when the two 
  Grand Councils, Northern and Southern, agreed to a division of territory, 
  Brother Yates was, on July 6 of that year, "acknowledged and admitted" a 
  member of the Northern Supreme Council and Representative near it of the 
  Southern Supreme Council. Brother Yates' Patent of July 5, 1828, is in 
  possession of St. George's Lodge.
   
  
  He was appointed 
  M.’.Ill.’.Ins.’.Lieut.’.Gr.’.Com.’. on June 15, 1844, and M.’. P.’.Sov.’. 
  Grand Commander August 25, 1851, which office he at once resigned in favor of 
  Ill.’. Edward A. Raymond. The latter, appreciating Brother Yates' great 
  services to the Supreme Council, appointed him Ill.’. Grand Chancellor H.’.E.’. 
  which office, together with Deputy of New York, he retained until his death.
   
  
  The latter years of his 
  life were spent in New York City, where he took an active interest in the 
  local bodies of the Rite, and was appointed the first "Sovereign of 
  Sovereigns" of Cosmopolitan Consistory of New York City, at its organization 
  in 1856.
   
  
  He died December 13, 
  1859, in New York and his remains were brought to Schenectady for burial. He 
  was buried in the "Old Dutch Burial Ground" between Green and Front Streets, 
  and when, in 1879, the plot was sold by the Dutch Reformed Church, his remains 
  were removed to Vale Cemetery, where they now rest in what is known as the 
  Union College plot. Brother Yates was never married.
   
  
  He was the author of a 
  work entitled History of the Manners and Ceremonies of the Indian Tribes. He 
  was also engaged, for twenty years, in the compilation of a valuable 
  Repertorium of Masonry, which was left unfinished at the time of his death, 
  and which, according to his family, was stolen from his lodgings in New York 
  after his death. But most of his Masonic writings appeared in contemporary 
  journals. Moore's Freemasons Magazine and Mackey's Masonic Quarterly Review 
  contain valuable communications from his pen on subjects of Masonic 
  archaeology, in which science he has no superior. Mackey's Encyclopedia of 
  Freemasonry contains many articles by him, especially on the higher degrees. 
  He was also a poet of no mean pretension, and an artist.
   
  
  His character is best 
  summed up in his own words. "I would fain have you believe, my dear brethren," 
  said he, "that, as a member of the Masonic Institution, if I have had any 
  ambition, it has been to study its science, and to discharge my duties as a 
  faithful Mason, rather than to obtain its official honors or personal benefits 
  of any kind. Self-aggrandizement has never formed any part of my Masonic 
  creed, and all who know me can bear witness that it never has of my practice."
   
  * * *
   
  
  DlFFERENCES AMONG 
  SCOTTISH RITE SYSTEMS
   
  
  A Masonic friend of 
  mine who has been in Japan for some time told me of a case of certain Jewish 
  members of the lodge under the English Constitutions, in Kobe, who were 
  desirous of taking the Royal Arch, but it appears that a rule exists that no 
  brother can take this degree until he has been a Master Mason for a certain 
  number of months. These brethren proceeded to some place or other in the East 
  where American lodges and chapters were established and took, not only the 
  Royal Arch but other degrees in the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite coming 
  back bestarred and bejewelled, with any amount of degrees including, of 
  course, the eighteenth, or Rose Croix. These, my friend told me, cost in the 
  neighborhood of $500 and were conferred one after another in a few days. What 
  I thought you might help me in is this: How on earth can a brother other than 
  a professing Christian possibly take the Rose Croix or eighteenth degree? Does 
  the American system differ in any way from the English and Scottish? I am a 
  member of the Alpha Chapter under the English Supreme Council (eighteenth 
  degree Rose Croix), and it seems to me that any one unable to subscribe to the 
  essential Christian doctrines could not possibly take the degree without 
  turning it into a blasphemous farce. Can you give me any information on this 
  head?
   
  
  William Moister, Editor 
  Masonic Journal of South Africa.
   
  
  The Scottish Rite 
  degrees as practiced in England, Scotland, Ireland, and South Africa are very 
  different from the same degrees as practiced here; and in no degree is the 
  difference more marked than in the Rose Croix. With you, Brother Moister, it 
  is Christian and confesses Christ as Son of God and Lord of Glory: here it is 
  interpreted so as to be available to Jews, Free Thinkers, etc. The Jews 
  referred to in your letter were not at all hypocritical. It is hardly probable 
  that they paid five hundred dollars for initiation. Can any reader inform us 
  if such high fees have ever been charged?
   
  
  ----o----
   
  YE 
  EDITOR'S CORNER
   
  
  Help! help! Such a 
  flood of contributions has been pouring in this past year that ye poor editor 
  is swamped - or should one say drowned? This means that many manuscripts wait 
  a long time before seeing the light of day. Several brethren have kindly 
  consented to having their articles passed on to other Masonic periodicals.
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  Brother Arthur C. 
  Parker, who has written for THE BUILDER some interesting items on Indian 
  Masonry, and four important manuscripts not yet published, has written a book 
  on "The Archeological History of New York." It is an important work.
   
  * * *
   
  
  Ye editor will begin a 
  new series of Study Club articles next March on "Chapters of Masonic History." 
  He is attempting to write an authentic history of Masonry in understandable 
  language. Many erudite brethren, here and abroad, have been lending him their 
  counsels.
   
  * * *
   
  
  Ye editor and his 
  associates have formed a conspiracy to make the January BUILDER the best 
  number yet published. It will be the ninety-seventh issue. We are growing old!
   
  * * *
   
  
  We are available for a 
  few lectures - very few. For information address The Editor, THE BUILDER, 2920 
  First Avenue East. Cedar Ranids. Iowa.